恶魔的蛹:波兰的资产阶级概念

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA Pub Date : 2021-01-19 DOI:10.12775/APH.2020.122.04
Adam Kożuchowski
{"title":"恶魔的蛹:波兰的资产阶级概念","authors":"Adam Kożuchowski","doi":"10.12775/APH.2020.122.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the history of the concept of bourgeoisie in Poland, emphasising troubles with its assimilation into the Polish language, and its special entanglement with the socialist and modernist discourse. The concept, it is argued, was borrowed in the late nineteenth century from France, where it concerned the urban upper-middle class; it arrived in Poland as part of the socialist discourse of the time, which gave it strong negative and derogatory connotations. The ambiguity that arose was further complicated by a number of other factors as well. First, the understanding of the term ‘bourgeoisie’ within the leftist discourse was itself ambivalent, combining the strictly theoretical definition encompassing the class of capitalist owners of the means of production, and the practical and emotional label attached to the urban classes. Second, also for the reasons indicated above, the concept of bourgeoisie was not able to replace the older Polish concepts regarding the urban population [mieszczanstwo], and the differences between them remained vague, and occasionally disputable. Third, not only did the term ‘bourgeoisie’ never fully emancipate itself from the domination of the indigenous concepts, but it also suffered from its translation into Polish, where it was regularly omitted when regarding Western European realities, but where it was a permanent fixture in the case of Russian and Soviet literature. Finally, the paper searches for the reasons behind the relative elimination of the concept from the Polish discourse, or at least large segments thereof, in the last half-century.","PeriodicalId":42490,"journal":{"name":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","volume":"122 1","pages":"79-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Demonic Chrysalis: The Concept of Bourgeoisie in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Adam Kożuchowski\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/APH.2020.122.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the history of the concept of bourgeoisie in Poland, emphasising troubles with its assimilation into the Polish language, and its special entanglement with the socialist and modernist discourse. The concept, it is argued, was borrowed in the late nineteenth century from France, where it concerned the urban upper-middle class; it arrived in Poland as part of the socialist discourse of the time, which gave it strong negative and derogatory connotations. The ambiguity that arose was further complicated by a number of other factors as well. First, the understanding of the term ‘bourgeoisie’ within the leftist discourse was itself ambivalent, combining the strictly theoretical definition encompassing the class of capitalist owners of the means of production, and the practical and emotional label attached to the urban classes. Second, also for the reasons indicated above, the concept of bourgeoisie was not able to replace the older Polish concepts regarding the urban population [mieszczanstwo], and the differences between them remained vague, and occasionally disputable. Third, not only did the term ‘bourgeoisie’ never fully emancipate itself from the domination of the indigenous concepts, but it also suffered from its translation into Polish, where it was regularly omitted when regarding Western European realities, but where it was a permanent fixture in the case of Russian and Soviet literature. Finally, the paper searches for the reasons behind the relative elimination of the concept from the Polish discourse, or at least large segments thereof, in the last half-century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"79-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/APH.2020.122.04\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/APH.2020.122.04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了波兰资产阶级概念的历史,强调了它在波兰语中的同化问题,以及它与社会主义和现代主义话语的特殊纠缠。有人认为,这个概念是在19世纪晚期从法国借来的,它涉及城市中上层阶级;它作为当时社会主义话语的一部分来到波兰,这给了它强烈的负面和贬损的含义。其他一些因素也使这种模棱两可进一步复杂化。首先,左派话语中对“资产阶级”一词的理解本身就是矛盾的,它结合了严格的理论定义,包括生产资料的资本家阶级,以及附属于城市阶级的实际和情感标签。其次,也是由于上述原因,资产阶级的概念无法取代波兰关于城市人口的旧概念,两者之间的差异仍然模糊,有时还会有争议。第三,“资产阶级”一词不仅从未完全从本土概念的支配中解放出来,而且它在波兰语的翻译中也受到了影响,在波兰语中,它在西欧现实中经常被省略,但在俄罗斯和苏联文学中,它是一个永久的固定装置。最后,本文探讨了在过去的半个世纪中,波兰话语或至少大部分话语中相对消除这一概念背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Demonic Chrysalis: The Concept of Bourgeoisie in Poland
This paper investigates the history of the concept of bourgeoisie in Poland, emphasising troubles with its assimilation into the Polish language, and its special entanglement with the socialist and modernist discourse. The concept, it is argued, was borrowed in the late nineteenth century from France, where it concerned the urban upper-middle class; it arrived in Poland as part of the socialist discourse of the time, which gave it strong negative and derogatory connotations. The ambiguity that arose was further complicated by a number of other factors as well. First, the understanding of the term ‘bourgeoisie’ within the leftist discourse was itself ambivalent, combining the strictly theoretical definition encompassing the class of capitalist owners of the means of production, and the practical and emotional label attached to the urban classes. Second, also for the reasons indicated above, the concept of bourgeoisie was not able to replace the older Polish concepts regarding the urban population [mieszczanstwo], and the differences between them remained vague, and occasionally disputable. Third, not only did the term ‘bourgeoisie’ never fully emancipate itself from the domination of the indigenous concepts, but it also suffered from its translation into Polish, where it was regularly omitted when regarding Western European realities, but where it was a permanent fixture in the case of Russian and Soviet literature. Finally, the paper searches for the reasons behind the relative elimination of the concept from the Polish discourse, or at least large segments thereof, in the last half-century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Półrocznik redagowany przez zespół pracowników naukowych Instytutu Historii PAN (do tomu 99 red. Maria Bogucka, od tomu 100 red. Halina Manikowska). Ceny numerów archiwalnych aktualizowane są na bieżąco.
期刊最新文献
Heritage Without Heirs: The German Legacy in Serbia. The Case of the Museum of Danube Swabians The Polish Catholic Church and the Public Memory of the Shoah: Between Mnemonic Backlash and Settling Accounts with the Past Jewish Autobiographical Writing. Memoirs of Moses Vasertsug (c. 1760–1832) Third War of Independence? The Anti-Colonial Dynamics of Ukraine’s Politics of Memory after 2014 on the Example of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses. Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1