超越语言的权利:绘制人权学者与组织的伙伴关系

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Human Rights Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1353/hrq.2023.0012
Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat, S. Hertel
{"title":"超越语言的权利:绘制人权学者与组织的伙伴关系","authors":"Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat, S. Hertel","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:For many human rights scholars, the study of human rights is more than intellectual curiosity; it is the motivation for their work. They try to use their research and expertise to improve human rights conditions and work with policymakers and advocacy groups. This article explores the complexities of partnerships between scholars and human rights organizations and groups (HROGs). Focusing primarily on the experience of social science and humanities scholars with HROGs, we identify a range of collaborations and possible areas of tension in each type of relationship. The immediate goal of the article is to draw attention to the areas of tension in the interest of enabling human rights scholars to develop more fruitful relationships with HROGs. The article also constitutes a critical step toward developing a more formal typology of scholar-organization relationships and formulating concrete hypotheses that can be used to explore variation in human rights outcomes stemming from different types of collaboration, while also identifying best practices.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"239 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rights Beyond Words: Mapping Human Rights Scholar-Organization Partnerships\",\"authors\":\"Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat, S. Hertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hrq.2023.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:For many human rights scholars, the study of human rights is more than intellectual curiosity; it is the motivation for their work. They try to use their research and expertise to improve human rights conditions and work with policymakers and advocacy groups. This article explores the complexities of partnerships between scholars and human rights organizations and groups (HROGs). Focusing primarily on the experience of social science and humanities scholars with HROGs, we identify a range of collaborations and possible areas of tension in each type of relationship. The immediate goal of the article is to draw attention to the areas of tension in the interest of enabling human rights scholars to develop more fruitful relationships with HROGs. The article also constitutes a critical step toward developing a more formal typology of scholar-organization relationships and formulating concrete hypotheses that can be used to explore variation in human rights outcomes stemming from different types of collaboration, while also identifying best practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Rights Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Rights Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对许多人权学者来说,研究人权不仅仅是出于求知欲;这是他们工作的动力。他们试图利用自己的研究和专业知识来改善人权状况,并与政策制定者和倡导团体合作。本文探讨了学者与人权组织和团体(hrog)之间伙伴关系的复杂性。我们主要关注社会科学和人文学者与HROGs的经验,确定了各种类型关系中的一系列合作和可能的紧张领域。这篇文章的直接目的是引起人们对紧张领域的关注,以使人权学者能够与人权组织建立更富有成效的关系。这篇文章也是朝着建立一种更正式的学者与组织关系类型和制定具体假设迈出的关键一步,这些假设可用于探索由不同类型的合作产生的人权结果的变化,同时也确定最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rights Beyond Words: Mapping Human Rights Scholar-Organization Partnerships
ABSTRACT:For many human rights scholars, the study of human rights is more than intellectual curiosity; it is the motivation for their work. They try to use their research and expertise to improve human rights conditions and work with policymakers and advocacy groups. This article explores the complexities of partnerships between scholars and human rights organizations and groups (HROGs). Focusing primarily on the experience of social science and humanities scholars with HROGs, we identify a range of collaborations and possible areas of tension in each type of relationship. The immediate goal of the article is to draw attention to the areas of tension in the interest of enabling human rights scholars to develop more fruitful relationships with HROGs. The article also constitutes a critical step toward developing a more formal typology of scholar-organization relationships and formulating concrete hypotheses that can be used to explore variation in human rights outcomes stemming from different types of collaboration, while also identifying best practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Now entering its twenty-fifth year, Human Rights Quarterly is widely recognizedas the leader in the field of human rights. Articles written by experts from around the world and from a range of disciplines are edited to be understood by the intelligent reader. The Quarterly provides up-to-date information on important developments within the United Nations and regional human rights organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. It presents current work in human rights research and policy analysis, reviews of related books, and philosophical essays probing the fundamental nature of human rights as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
期刊最新文献
Guerrilla Governance: Troubling Gender in the FARC The Right to Flee the Dangers of War: Rethinking Ukraine's Gender-Based Restriction on Civilian Men's Freedom of Movement Limits to Negotiated Accountability of Economic Accomplices: The Case of Volkswagen do Brasil The Reeducation of Race: Jewishness and the Politics of Antiracism in Postcolonial Thought by Sonali Thakkar (review) The Agency of Refugees and Asylum-Seeking Women in the Face of the Inability of States to Provide Protection Against Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1