沟通咨询和外联

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220
San Bolkan, Darrin J. Griffin
{"title":"沟通咨询和外联","authors":"San Bolkan, Darrin J. Griffin","doi":"10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consultants operate as translators who cull relevant literature to produce lessons as these pertain to skills, strategies, and ideas that practitioners can apply in professional contexts (Waldeck, 2016). Having said that, our impression is that contributors to Communication Education are well positioned to provide practical advice about communicating with others, though this might not seem apparent at first. As such, we believe that our charge as communication professionals is to reframe how we think about what we know and to convince others that our scholarly focus includes more than just studying the basics of how people talk to each other. Our first charge as communication professionals is to reframe our own understanding of what we do. At its core, the topics published in Communication Education center on processes of human learning, including understanding how people pay attention, organize complex information, and retain knowledge for use (Mayer, 2021). Thus, instead of seeing ourselves as researchers who focus on students’ classroom experiences, we might also envision ourselves as scholars who investigate how best to facilitate human information processing and recall. From this perspective, conclusions generated from our research apply to just about any professional endeavor. Don’t believe us? Try speaking in public without knowing what it takes to capture a person’s attention, try negotiating a business deal without understanding how to be clear when communicating your needs, or try inspiring a workforce without understanding how different types of motivation influence effort. The fundamental idea in each of these examples is studied in the context of instructional communication, and although we typically focus on learning interventions, these notions are valuable beyond the classroom. Our second charge as communication professionals is twofold and includes helping others understand that our scholarly focus includes more than the basics of communicating with others and convincing organizations that they stand to benefit from our work. Regarding the former, we are often surprised that the details of what we research are entirely new to the people we interact with—even for the educators and trainers with whom we collaborate. Most people know little about the nuance in what we study, and so they fail to comprehend how the knowledge we have generated can be helpful in their professional endeavors. For instance, many professional speakers are familiar with the importance of clarity, but they are unaware that the concept is multidimensional and manifests through a core set of specific behaviors (Bolkan, 2017). Relatedly, though most professional educators have thought about what they are going to teach from the","PeriodicalId":47722,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication consulting and outreach\",\"authors\":\"San Bolkan, Darrin J. Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consultants operate as translators who cull relevant literature to produce lessons as these pertain to skills, strategies, and ideas that practitioners can apply in professional contexts (Waldeck, 2016). Having said that, our impression is that contributors to Communication Education are well positioned to provide practical advice about communicating with others, though this might not seem apparent at first. As such, we believe that our charge as communication professionals is to reframe how we think about what we know and to convince others that our scholarly focus includes more than just studying the basics of how people talk to each other. Our first charge as communication professionals is to reframe our own understanding of what we do. At its core, the topics published in Communication Education center on processes of human learning, including understanding how people pay attention, organize complex information, and retain knowledge for use (Mayer, 2021). Thus, instead of seeing ourselves as researchers who focus on students’ classroom experiences, we might also envision ourselves as scholars who investigate how best to facilitate human information processing and recall. From this perspective, conclusions generated from our research apply to just about any professional endeavor. Don’t believe us? Try speaking in public without knowing what it takes to capture a person’s attention, try negotiating a business deal without understanding how to be clear when communicating your needs, or try inspiring a workforce without understanding how different types of motivation influence effort. The fundamental idea in each of these examples is studied in the context of instructional communication, and although we typically focus on learning interventions, these notions are valuable beyond the classroom. Our second charge as communication professionals is twofold and includes helping others understand that our scholarly focus includes more than the basics of communicating with others and convincing organizations that they stand to benefit from our work. Regarding the former, we are often surprised that the details of what we research are entirely new to the people we interact with—even for the educators and trainers with whom we collaborate. Most people know little about the nuance in what we study, and so they fail to comprehend how the knowledge we have generated can be helpful in their professional endeavors. For instance, many professional speakers are familiar with the importance of clarity, but they are unaware that the concept is multidimensional and manifests through a core set of specific behaviors (Bolkan, 2017). Relatedly, though most professional educators have thought about what they are going to teach from the\",\"PeriodicalId\":47722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMUNICATION EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMUNICATION EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

顾问是翻译人员,他们挑选相关文献来制作课程,因为这些课程涉及从业者可以在专业环境中应用的技能、策略和想法(Waldeck,2016)。话虽如此,我们的印象是,沟通教育的贡献者能够提供与他人沟通的实用建议,尽管这一点起初可能并不明显。因此,我们相信,作为沟通专业人士,我们的职责是重塑我们对自己所知的思考方式,并说服他人,我们的学术重点不仅仅包括研究人们如何相互交谈的基本知识。作为沟通专业人士,我们的首要任务是重塑我们自己对自己所做事情的理解。《沟通教育》上发表的主题核心是人类学习过程,包括理解人们如何关注、组织复杂信息和保留知识以供使用(Mayer,2021)。因此,我们不应该把自己视为关注学生课堂体验的研究人员,而应该把自己想象成研究如何最好地促进人类信息处理和回忆的学者。从这个角度来看,我们的研究得出的结论几乎适用于任何专业努力。不相信我们?试着在不知道如何吸引别人注意力的情况下在公共场合发言,试着在谈判商业交易时不了解如何在沟通需求时明确自己的需求,或者试着激励员工,但不了解不同类型的动机如何影响努力。每个例子中的基本思想都是在教学交流的背景下研究的,尽管我们通常关注学习干预,但这些概念在课堂之外是有价值的。作为沟通专业人士,我们的第二项职责是双重的,包括帮助他人理解我们的学术重点不仅仅包括与他人沟通的基础,以及说服组织他们将从我们的工作中受益。关于前者,我们经常感到惊讶的是,我们研究的细节对我们互动的人来说是全新的,甚至对我们合作的教育工作者和培训师来说也是如此。大多数人对我们研究中的细微差别知之甚少,因此他们无法理解我们所产生的知识如何对他们的专业努力有所帮助。例如,许多专业演讲者都熟悉清晰的重要性,但他们没有意识到这个概念是多维的,并通过一系列核心的具体行为来体现(Bolkan,2017)。与此相关的是,尽管大多数专业教育工作者都考虑过他们将从
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Communication consulting and outreach
Consultants operate as translators who cull relevant literature to produce lessons as these pertain to skills, strategies, and ideas that practitioners can apply in professional contexts (Waldeck, 2016). Having said that, our impression is that contributors to Communication Education are well positioned to provide practical advice about communicating with others, though this might not seem apparent at first. As such, we believe that our charge as communication professionals is to reframe how we think about what we know and to convince others that our scholarly focus includes more than just studying the basics of how people talk to each other. Our first charge as communication professionals is to reframe our own understanding of what we do. At its core, the topics published in Communication Education center on processes of human learning, including understanding how people pay attention, organize complex information, and retain knowledge for use (Mayer, 2021). Thus, instead of seeing ourselves as researchers who focus on students’ classroom experiences, we might also envision ourselves as scholars who investigate how best to facilitate human information processing and recall. From this perspective, conclusions generated from our research apply to just about any professional endeavor. Don’t believe us? Try speaking in public without knowing what it takes to capture a person’s attention, try negotiating a business deal without understanding how to be clear when communicating your needs, or try inspiring a workforce without understanding how different types of motivation influence effort. The fundamental idea in each of these examples is studied in the context of instructional communication, and although we typically focus on learning interventions, these notions are valuable beyond the classroom. Our second charge as communication professionals is twofold and includes helping others understand that our scholarly focus includes more than the basics of communicating with others and convincing organizations that they stand to benefit from our work. Regarding the former, we are often surprised that the details of what we research are entirely new to the people we interact with—even for the educators and trainers with whom we collaborate. Most people know little about the nuance in what we study, and so they fail to comprehend how the knowledge we have generated can be helpful in their professional endeavors. For instance, many professional speakers are familiar with the importance of clarity, but they are unaware that the concept is multidimensional and manifests through a core set of specific behaviors (Bolkan, 2017). Relatedly, though most professional educators have thought about what they are going to teach from the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION EDUCATION
COMMUNICATION EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
34.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Communication Education is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. Communication Education publishes original scholarship that advances understanding of the role of communication in the teaching and learning process in diverse spaces, structures, and interactions, within and outside of academia. Communication Education welcomes scholarship from diverse perspectives and methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, and critical/textual approaches. All submissions must be methodologically rigorous and theoretically grounded and geared toward advancing knowledge production in communication, teaching, and learning. Scholarship in Communication Education addresses the intersections of communication, teaching, and learning related to topics and contexts that include but are not limited to: • student/teacher relationships • student/teacher characteristics • student/teacher identity construction • student learning outcomes • student engagement • diversity, inclusion, and difference • social justice • instructional technology/social media • the basic communication course • service learning • communication across the curriculum • communication instruction in business and the professions • communication instruction in civic arenas In addition to articles, the journal will publish occasional scholarly exchanges on topics related to communication, teaching, and learning, such as: • Analytic review articles: agenda-setting pieces including examinations of key questions about the field • Forum essays: themed pieces for dialogue or debate on current communication, teaching, and learning issues
期刊最新文献
With much appreciation Advocating for and valuing instructional and communication education: standing on the shoulders of giants Forum epilogue Looking outside and addressing the crucial issues Presenting our wounds, healing the discipline: the problem of communication effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1