掠夺性殖民主义:美国土著妇女与性客体化暴力

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of the History of Sexuality Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.7560/jhs30204
G. Smithers
{"title":"掠夺性殖民主义:美国土著妇女与性客体化暴力","authors":"G. Smithers","doi":"10.7560/jhs30204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n S e p t e m b e r 1 9 5 4 t h e b u r l e S q u e performer known by the stage name Princess DoMay told a reporter from the Columbus Citizen newspaper that “I’m a full-blooded halfbreed.” DoMay’s tongue-in-cheek declaration was equal parts sales pitch and cultural appropriation, but at the height of the Cold War no one seemed to care. Men, mostly white men, kept turning up at her shows and buying the magazines in which she appeared, always in provocative poses. DoMay’s persona, contrived with her manager and husband, Doug Bonde, was a financially profitable fraud. She knew how to capitalize on racial and sexual stereotypes, parlaying her white privilege into a curated public persona as a racially exotic and sexually accessible Cherokee woman. How did DoMay, and scores of other white women, get away with this fraud? What historical damage did it perpetuate? And how can an Indigenous feminist reading of the past illuminate paths toward sexual sovereignty and empowered women and girls within nurturing communities? This article addresses these questions by focusing on “redface” performers in twentieth-century burlesque and evaluating how Playboy magazine perpetuated predatory representations of women claiming to have Indigenous ancestry. Engaging in this type of historical analysis is traumatic and can be triggering","PeriodicalId":45704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","volume":"30 1","pages":"253 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predatory Colonialism: Indigenous Women and the Violence of Sexual Objectification in the United States\",\"authors\":\"G. Smithers\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/jhs30204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I n S e p t e m b e r 1 9 5 4 t h e b u r l e S q u e performer known by the stage name Princess DoMay told a reporter from the Columbus Citizen newspaper that “I’m a full-blooded halfbreed.” DoMay’s tongue-in-cheek declaration was equal parts sales pitch and cultural appropriation, but at the height of the Cold War no one seemed to care. Men, mostly white men, kept turning up at her shows and buying the magazines in which she appeared, always in provocative poses. DoMay’s persona, contrived with her manager and husband, Doug Bonde, was a financially profitable fraud. She knew how to capitalize on racial and sexual stereotypes, parlaying her white privilege into a curated public persona as a racially exotic and sexually accessible Cherokee woman. How did DoMay, and scores of other white women, get away with this fraud? What historical damage did it perpetuate? And how can an Indigenous feminist reading of the past illuminate paths toward sexual sovereignty and empowered women and girls within nurturing communities? This article addresses these questions by focusing on “redface” performers in twentieth-century burlesque and evaluating how Playboy magazine perpetuated predatory representations of women claiming to have Indigenous ancestry. Engaging in this type of historical analysis is traumatic and can be triggering\",\"PeriodicalId\":45704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"253 - 278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs30204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs30204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2005年,这位以艺名“多梅公主”(Princess DoMay)著称的演员在接受《哥伦布市民报》(Columbus Citizen)记者采访时表示:“我是一个纯血统混血儿。”多梅半开玩笑的声明既是推销,也是文化挪用,但在冷战的高峰时期,似乎没有人在乎。男性,主要是白人男性,不断出现在她的时装秀上,购买她出现的杂志,总是摆出挑逗的姿势。杜美和她的经纪人兼丈夫道格·邦德(Doug Bonde)一起策划的这个角色,是一个经济上有利可图的骗局。她知道如何利用种族和性别的刻板印象,将自己的白人特权转化为精心策划的公众形象,成为一个具有异域种族色彩、在性方面容易接近的切罗基女性。多梅和其他几十名白人女性是如何逃脱这场骗局的?它造成了什么样的历史破坏?土著女性主义对过去的解读如何照亮通往性主权的道路,并在养育社区中赋予妇女和女孩权力?本文通过关注20世纪滑稽剧中的“红脸”表演者来解决这些问题,并评估《花花公子》杂志是如何将声称拥有土著血统的女性的掠夺性表现延续下去的。从事这种类型的历史分析是创伤性的,可以触发
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predatory Colonialism: Indigenous Women and the Violence of Sexual Objectification in the United States
I n S e p t e m b e r 1 9 5 4 t h e b u r l e S q u e performer known by the stage name Princess DoMay told a reporter from the Columbus Citizen newspaper that “I’m a full-blooded halfbreed.” DoMay’s tongue-in-cheek declaration was equal parts sales pitch and cultural appropriation, but at the height of the Cold War no one seemed to care. Men, mostly white men, kept turning up at her shows and buying the magazines in which she appeared, always in provocative poses. DoMay’s persona, contrived with her manager and husband, Doug Bonde, was a financially profitable fraud. She knew how to capitalize on racial and sexual stereotypes, parlaying her white privilege into a curated public persona as a racially exotic and sexually accessible Cherokee woman. How did DoMay, and scores of other white women, get away with this fraud? What historical damage did it perpetuate? And how can an Indigenous feminist reading of the past illuminate paths toward sexual sovereignty and empowered women and girls within nurturing communities? This article addresses these questions by focusing on “redface” performers in twentieth-century burlesque and evaluating how Playboy magazine perpetuated predatory representations of women claiming to have Indigenous ancestry. Engaging in this type of historical analysis is traumatic and can be triggering
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Productive Sexological Self-Censorship in Late Communist Poland between State and Church “Are We to Treat Human Nature as the Early Victorian Lady Treated Telegrams?”: British and German Sexual Science, Investigations of Nature, and the Fight against Censorship, ca. 1890–1940 “A Mechanical View of Sex outside the Context of Love and the Family”: Contraception, Censorship, and the Brook Advisory Centre in Britain, 1964–1985 Introduction: Sex, Science, and Censorship Censorship in Flux: Sex and Sexological Knowledge at the Great Police Exhibition of 1926 in Weimar Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1