机器学习模型在阿尔茨海默病诊断中的表现

Q1 Decision Sciences Annals of Data Science Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s40745-022-00452-2
Siddhartha Kumar Arjaria, Abhishek Singh Rathore, Dhananjay Bisen, Sanjib Bhattacharyya
{"title":"机器学习模型在阿尔茨海默病诊断中的表现","authors":"Siddhartha Kumar Arjaria,&nbsp;Abhishek Singh Rathore,&nbsp;Dhananjay Bisen,&nbsp;Sanjib Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1007/s40745-022-00452-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent times, various machine learning approaches have been widely employed for effective diagnosis and prediction of diseases like cancer, thyroid, Covid-19, etc. Likewise, Alzheimer’s (AD) is also one progressive malady that destroys memory and cognitive function over time. Unfortunately, there are no dedicated AI-based solutions for diagnoses of AD to go hand in hand with medical diagnosis, even though multiple factors contribute to the diagnosis, making AI a very viable supplementary diagnostic solution. This paper reports an endeavor to apply various machine learning algorithms like SGD, k-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, Decision tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Neural Network, SVM, and Naïve Bayes on the dataset of affected victims to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. Longitudinal collections of subjects from OASIS dataset have been used for prediction. Moreover, some feature selection and dimension reduction methods like Information Gain, Information Gain Ratio, Gini index, Chi-Squared, and PCA are applied to rank different factors and identify the optimum number of factors from the dataset for disease diagnosis. Furthermore, performance is evaluated of each classifier in terms of ROC-AUC, accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision as well as included comparative analysis between algorithms. Our study suggests that approximately 90% classification accuracy is observed under top-rated four features CDR, SES, nWBV, and EDUC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performances of Machine Learning Models for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease\",\"authors\":\"Siddhartha Kumar Arjaria,&nbsp;Abhishek Singh Rathore,&nbsp;Dhananjay Bisen,&nbsp;Sanjib Bhattacharyya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40745-022-00452-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In recent times, various machine learning approaches have been widely employed for effective diagnosis and prediction of diseases like cancer, thyroid, Covid-19, etc. Likewise, Alzheimer’s (AD) is also one progressive malady that destroys memory and cognitive function over time. Unfortunately, there are no dedicated AI-based solutions for diagnoses of AD to go hand in hand with medical diagnosis, even though multiple factors contribute to the diagnosis, making AI a very viable supplementary diagnostic solution. This paper reports an endeavor to apply various machine learning algorithms like SGD, k-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, Decision tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Neural Network, SVM, and Naïve Bayes on the dataset of affected victims to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. Longitudinal collections of subjects from OASIS dataset have been used for prediction. Moreover, some feature selection and dimension reduction methods like Information Gain, Information Gain Ratio, Gini index, Chi-Squared, and PCA are applied to rank different factors and identify the optimum number of factors from the dataset for disease diagnosis. Furthermore, performance is evaluated of each classifier in terms of ROC-AUC, accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision as well as included comparative analysis between algorithms. Our study suggests that approximately 90% classification accuracy is observed under top-rated four features CDR, SES, nWBV, and EDUC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Data Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-022-00452-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-022-00452-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近来,各种机器学习方法已被广泛应用于癌症、甲状腺、Covid-19 等疾病的有效诊断和预测。同样,阿尔茨海默氏症(AD)也是一种渐进性疾病,会随着时间的推移破坏记忆和认知功能。遗憾的是,目前还没有专门的基于人工智能的解决方案来诊断阿兹海默症,以配合医疗诊断,尽管诊断是由多种因素造成的,这使得人工智能成为一种非常可行的辅助诊断解决方案。本文报告了在受影响的受害者数据集上应用 SGD、k-Nearest Neighbors、逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林、AdaBoost、神经网络、SVM 和 Naïve Bayes 等各种机器学习算法诊断阿尔茨海默病的尝试。OASIS 数据集中的受试者纵向集合被用于预测。此外,还采用了一些特征选择和降维方法,如信息增益、信息增益比、基尼指数、Chi-Squared 和 PCA,对不同的因子进行排序,并从数据集中找出用于疾病诊断的最佳因子数。此外,我们还从 ROC-AUC、准确率、F1 分数、召回率和精确度等方面评估了每种分类器的性能,并对不同算法进行了比较分析。我们的研究表明,在 CDR、SES、nWBV 和 EDUC 四个最高级别的特征下,分类准确率约为 90%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performances of Machine Learning Models for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

In recent times, various machine learning approaches have been widely employed for effective diagnosis and prediction of diseases like cancer, thyroid, Covid-19, etc. Likewise, Alzheimer’s (AD) is also one progressive malady that destroys memory and cognitive function over time. Unfortunately, there are no dedicated AI-based solutions for diagnoses of AD to go hand in hand with medical diagnosis, even though multiple factors contribute to the diagnosis, making AI a very viable supplementary diagnostic solution. This paper reports an endeavor to apply various machine learning algorithms like SGD, k-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, Decision tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Neural Network, SVM, and Naïve Bayes on the dataset of affected victims to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. Longitudinal collections of subjects from OASIS dataset have been used for prediction. Moreover, some feature selection and dimension reduction methods like Information Gain, Information Gain Ratio, Gini index, Chi-Squared, and PCA are applied to rank different factors and identify the optimum number of factors from the dataset for disease diagnosis. Furthermore, performance is evaluated of each classifier in terms of ROC-AUC, accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision as well as included comparative analysis between algorithms. Our study suggests that approximately 90% classification accuracy is observed under top-rated four features CDR, SES, nWBV, and EDUC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
期刊最新文献
Non-negative Sparse Matrix Factorization for Soft Clustering of Territory Risk Analysis Kernel Method for Estimating Matusita Overlapping Coefficient Using Numerical Approximations Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Generalized Inflated Power Series Distributions Farm-Level Smart Crop Recommendation Framework Using Machine Learning Reaction Function for Financial Market Reacting to Events or Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1