批判性还是创造性?生物写信给维克多·弗兰肯斯坦

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1080/1358684X.2022.2048949
Kate Bomford
{"title":"批判性还是创造性?生物写信给维克多·弗兰肯斯坦","authors":"Kate Bomford","doi":"10.1080/1358684X.2022.2048949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay considers the relative merits of critical writing and writing in role as a means of enabling and assessing students’ responses to literary texts. Drawing largely on the author’s experience of teaching Frankenstein, it argues that the distinction between critical and creative writing is not as absolute as is sometimes supposed, and that so-called ‘creative’ tasks can be a very effective way of generating critical insight. It explores the significant limitations and limiting potential of the critical essay as a form, and argues that creative tasks such as writing in role afford far greater opportunities for school students to write fully and successfully as themselves. It links the longevity and pervasiveness of the critical essay as a mode of assessment within the English school system to its ‘exam-friendliness’, and makes the case for an alternative and more equitable approach that would allow for young people to be judged on their true potential as thinkers and writers.","PeriodicalId":54156,"journal":{"name":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical or Creative? The Creature Writes to Victor Frankenstein\",\"authors\":\"Kate Bomford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1358684X.2022.2048949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay considers the relative merits of critical writing and writing in role as a means of enabling and assessing students’ responses to literary texts. Drawing largely on the author’s experience of teaching Frankenstein, it argues that the distinction between critical and creative writing is not as absolute as is sometimes supposed, and that so-called ‘creative’ tasks can be a very effective way of generating critical insight. It explores the significant limitations and limiting potential of the critical essay as a form, and argues that creative tasks such as writing in role afford far greater opportunities for school students to write fully and successfully as themselves. It links the longevity and pervasiveness of the critical essay as a mode of assessment within the English school system to its ‘exam-friendliness’, and makes the case for an alternative and more equitable approach that would allow for young people to be judged on their true potential as thinkers and writers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2022.2048949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2022.2048949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考虑了批判性写作和角色写作的相对优点,作为促进和评估学生对文学文本反应的一种手段。根据作者教授《弗兰肯斯坦》的经验,本书认为批判性写作和创造性写作之间的区别并不像人们有时认为的那样绝对,所谓的“创造性”任务可能是产生批判性洞察力的一种非常有效的方式。它探讨了批判性文章作为一种形式的重大局限性和局限性潜力,并认为创造性的任务,如角色写作,为学生提供了更多的机会,让他们充分地、成功地完成自己的写作。它将批评文章作为一种评估模式的持久性和普遍性与英国学校系统的“考试友好性”联系起来,并提出了一种替代的、更公平的方法,使年轻人能够根据他们作为思想家和作家的真正潜力得到评判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical or Creative? The Creature Writes to Victor Frankenstein
ABSTRACT This essay considers the relative merits of critical writing and writing in role as a means of enabling and assessing students’ responses to literary texts. Drawing largely on the author’s experience of teaching Frankenstein, it argues that the distinction between critical and creative writing is not as absolute as is sometimes supposed, and that so-called ‘creative’ tasks can be a very effective way of generating critical insight. It explores the significant limitations and limiting potential of the critical essay as a form, and argues that creative tasks such as writing in role afford far greater opportunities for school students to write fully and successfully as themselves. It links the longevity and pervasiveness of the critical essay as a mode of assessment within the English school system to its ‘exam-friendliness’, and makes the case for an alternative and more equitable approach that would allow for young people to be judged on their true potential as thinkers and writers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
From the Derived to the Deviant: A Translation-Based Creative Writing Pedagogy Teaching Fairy Tales Old and New: Revisiting Andersen via Emma Donoghue What Keeps a Narrative going? Teaching Narrative Interest Knowledge and English A Philosophical Enquiry into Subject English and Creative Writing , by Oli Belas, London, Routledge, 2023, 146 pp., Hardback £120; £35.09 (ebook), ISBN 978-0367-48736-2 Students’ Understanding of Role
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1