{"title":"非饱和土多模态水力特性一般模型的评价","authors":"K. Seki, N. Toride, M. V. van Genuchten","doi":"10.2478/johh-2022-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many soils and other porous media exhibit dual- or multi-porosity type features. In a previous study (Seki et al., 2022) we presented multimodal water retention and closed-form hydraulic conductivity equations for such media. The objective of this study is to show that the proposed equations are practically useful. Specifically, dual-BC (Brooks and Corey)-CH (common head) (DBC), dual-VG (van Genuchten)-CH (DVC), and KO (Kosugi)1BC2-CH (KBC) models were evaluated for a broad range of soil types. The three models showed good agreement with measured water retention and hydraulic conductivity data over a wide range of pressure heads. Results were obtained by first optimizing water retention parameters and then optimizing the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and two parameters (p, q) or (p, r) in the general hydraulic conductivity equation. Although conventionally the tortuosity factor p is optimized and (q, r) fixed, sensitivity analyses showed that optimization of two parameters (p + r, qr) is required for the multimodal models. For 20 soils from the UNSODA database, the average R2 for log (hydraulic conductivity) was highest (0.985) for the KBC model with r = 1 and optimization of (Ks, p, q). This result was almost equivalent (0.973) to the DVC model with q = 1 and optimization of (Ks, p, r); both were higher than R2 for the widely used Peters model (0.956) when optimizing (Ks, p, a, ω). The proposed equations are useful for practical applications while mathematically being simple and consistent.","PeriodicalId":50183,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics","volume":"71 1","pages":"22 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a general model for multimodal unsaturated soil hydraulic properties\",\"authors\":\"K. Seki, N. Toride, M. V. van Genuchten\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/johh-2022-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many soils and other porous media exhibit dual- or multi-porosity type features. In a previous study (Seki et al., 2022) we presented multimodal water retention and closed-form hydraulic conductivity equations for such media. The objective of this study is to show that the proposed equations are practically useful. Specifically, dual-BC (Brooks and Corey)-CH (common head) (DBC), dual-VG (van Genuchten)-CH (DVC), and KO (Kosugi)1BC2-CH (KBC) models were evaluated for a broad range of soil types. The three models showed good agreement with measured water retention and hydraulic conductivity data over a wide range of pressure heads. Results were obtained by first optimizing water retention parameters and then optimizing the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and two parameters (p, q) or (p, r) in the general hydraulic conductivity equation. Although conventionally the tortuosity factor p is optimized and (q, r) fixed, sensitivity analyses showed that optimization of two parameters (p + r, qr) is required for the multimodal models. For 20 soils from the UNSODA database, the average R2 for log (hydraulic conductivity) was highest (0.985) for the KBC model with r = 1 and optimization of (Ks, p, q). This result was almost equivalent (0.973) to the DVC model with q = 1 and optimization of (Ks, p, r); both were higher than R2 for the widely used Peters model (0.956) when optimizing (Ks, p, a, ω). The proposed equations are useful for practical applications while mathematically being simple and consistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2022-0039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2022-0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of a general model for multimodal unsaturated soil hydraulic properties
Abstract Many soils and other porous media exhibit dual- or multi-porosity type features. In a previous study (Seki et al., 2022) we presented multimodal water retention and closed-form hydraulic conductivity equations for such media. The objective of this study is to show that the proposed equations are practically useful. Specifically, dual-BC (Brooks and Corey)-CH (common head) (DBC), dual-VG (van Genuchten)-CH (DVC), and KO (Kosugi)1BC2-CH (KBC) models were evaluated for a broad range of soil types. The three models showed good agreement with measured water retention and hydraulic conductivity data over a wide range of pressure heads. Results were obtained by first optimizing water retention parameters and then optimizing the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and two parameters (p, q) or (p, r) in the general hydraulic conductivity equation. Although conventionally the tortuosity factor p is optimized and (q, r) fixed, sensitivity analyses showed that optimization of two parameters (p + r, qr) is required for the multimodal models. For 20 soils from the UNSODA database, the average R2 for log (hydraulic conductivity) was highest (0.985) for the KBC model with r = 1 and optimization of (Ks, p, q). This result was almost equivalent (0.973) to the DVC model with q = 1 and optimization of (Ks, p, r); both were higher than R2 for the widely used Peters model (0.956) when optimizing (Ks, p, a, ω). The proposed equations are useful for practical applications while mathematically being simple and consistent.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS is an international open access journal for the basic disciplines of water sciences. The scope of hydrology is limited to biohydrology, catchment hydrology and vadose zone hydrology, primarily of temperate zone. The hydromechanics covers theoretical, experimental and computational hydraulics and fluid mechanics in various fields, two- and multiphase flows, including non-Newtonian flow, and new frontiers in hydraulics. The journal is published quarterly in English. The types of contribution include: research and review articles, short communications and technical notes. The articles have been thoroughly peer reviewed by international specialists and promoted to researchers working in the same field.