影响数字金融消费者保护的决定因素:来自135个国家的证据

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00301
Van Dinh , Dao-Van Le , Duy Duong , Dung Pham
{"title":"影响数字金融消费者保护的决定因素:来自135个国家的证据","authors":"Van Dinh ,&nbsp;Dao-Van Le ,&nbsp;Duy Duong ,&nbsp;Dung Pham","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Asymmetric information in digital financial markets is increasingly becoming a severe problem in the digital era. Consumers of digital finance suffer from asymmetric information compared to financial agents due to the complexity of services and their passive position in collecting, analyzing, and processing information. This study offers measures to improve the practice of digital financial consumer protection (DFCP) through quantitative analysis, using a sample of 135 countries from 2014 to 2018. This manuscript indicates that two groups of factors positively affect financial consumer protection: market size (openness) and technological readiness. The results show that technological improvement and economic openness factors worldwide are seen as tremendous opportunities in the digital age, rather than challenges, for strengthening financial consumer protection. Governments thus need to adopt policies that focus on absorbing new technology, encouraging innovation, and opening the economy instead of controlling actions to protect their citizens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article e00301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants affecting digital financial consumer protection: Evidence from 135 countries\",\"authors\":\"Van Dinh ,&nbsp;Dao-Van Le ,&nbsp;Duy Duong ,&nbsp;Dung Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Asymmetric information in digital financial markets is increasingly becoming a severe problem in the digital era. Consumers of digital finance suffer from asymmetric information compared to financial agents due to the complexity of services and their passive position in collecting, analyzing, and processing information. This study offers measures to improve the practice of digital financial consumer protection (DFCP) through quantitative analysis, using a sample of 135 countries from 2014 to 2018. This manuscript indicates that two groups of factors positively affect financial consumer protection: market size (openness) and technological readiness. The results show that technological improvement and economic openness factors worldwide are seen as tremendous opportunities in the digital age, rather than challenges, for strengthening financial consumer protection. Governments thus need to adopt policies that focus on absorbing new technology, encouraging innovation, and opening the economy instead of controlling actions to protect their citizens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在数字时代,数字金融市场的信息不对称问题日益突出。由于服务的复杂性以及消费者在收集、分析和处理信息方面的被动地位,数字金融消费者与金融代理相比存在信息不对称。本研究通过定量分析,利用2014年至2018年135个国家的样本,提出了改进数字金融消费者保护(DFCP)实践的措施。本文指出两组因素正向影响金融消费者保护:市场规模(开放程度)和技术准备程度。结果表明,全球范围内的技术进步和经济开放因素被视为数字时代加强金融消费者保护的巨大机遇,而不是挑战。因此,政府需要采取侧重于吸收新技术、鼓励创新和开放经济的政策,而不是控制保护公民的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants affecting digital financial consumer protection: Evidence from 135 countries

Asymmetric information in digital financial markets is increasingly becoming a severe problem in the digital era. Consumers of digital finance suffer from asymmetric information compared to financial agents due to the complexity of services and their passive position in collecting, analyzing, and processing information. This study offers measures to improve the practice of digital financial consumer protection (DFCP) through quantitative analysis, using a sample of 135 countries from 2014 to 2018. This manuscript indicates that two groups of factors positively affect financial consumer protection: market size (openness) and technological readiness. The results show that technological improvement and economic openness factors worldwide are seen as tremendous opportunities in the digital age, rather than challenges, for strengthening financial consumer protection. Governments thus need to adopt policies that focus on absorbing new technology, encouraging innovation, and opening the economy instead of controlling actions to protect their citizens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1