用筛子对柠檬桉、褐毛桉和丙酸桉种子进行分类

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Cientifica Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1445
Ana Sara Vieira Barbosa, T. S. Jeromini, Givanildo Zildo Silva, C. C. Martins
{"title":"用筛子对柠檬桉、褐毛桉和丙酸桉种子进行分类","authors":"Ana Sara Vieira Barbosa, T. S. Jeromini, Givanildo Zildo Silva, C. C. Martins","doi":"10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeds’ qualities are influenced by several factors such as the density and size of seeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physiological quality of Corymbia citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds that were subjected to classification by sieve. The seeds passed through sieves that retained the following sizes: C. citriodora (2.00; 1.68; 1.41; 1.19; 1.00 mm), E. phaeotricha (1.41; 1.19; 1.00; 0.84 mm) and E. propinqua (1.00; 0.84; 0.71; 0.59 e 0.50 mm). The tests of retention percentage, physical purity, germination, first count of germination, germination speed index and average germination time were performed. The design used was randomized with four replications and five treatments for C. citriodora and E. propinqua, and four treatments for E. phaeotricha, due to the number of sieves that retained seeds. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test. When significant, the statistics related to the classification of seeds by sieves were compared using the Tukey test with 5% probability. The use of sieve classification is effective for the separation of seeds with high physical and physiological quality. C. citriodora with a seed size of 1.41 to 2.00 mm have maximum physical and physiological quality and can be pelleted. For E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua, seeds with a size of 1.19 to 1.41 mm and 0.84 to 1.00 mm, respectively, have the highest physical and physiological quality.","PeriodicalId":35044,"journal":{"name":"Cientifica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eucalyptus citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds subjected to classification by sieves\",\"authors\":\"Ana Sara Vieira Barbosa, T. S. Jeromini, Givanildo Zildo Silva, C. C. Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seeds’ qualities are influenced by several factors such as the density and size of seeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physiological quality of Corymbia citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds that were subjected to classification by sieve. The seeds passed through sieves that retained the following sizes: C. citriodora (2.00; 1.68; 1.41; 1.19; 1.00 mm), E. phaeotricha (1.41; 1.19; 1.00; 0.84 mm) and E. propinqua (1.00; 0.84; 0.71; 0.59 e 0.50 mm). The tests of retention percentage, physical purity, germination, first count of germination, germination speed index and average germination time were performed. The design used was randomized with four replications and five treatments for C. citriodora and E. propinqua, and four treatments for E. phaeotricha, due to the number of sieves that retained seeds. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test. When significant, the statistics related to the classification of seeds by sieves were compared using the Tukey test with 5% probability. The use of sieve classification is effective for the separation of seeds with high physical and physiological quality. C. citriodora with a seed size of 1.41 to 2.00 mm have maximum physical and physiological quality and can be pelleted. For E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua, seeds with a size of 1.19 to 1.41 mm and 0.84 to 1.00 mm, respectively, have the highest physical and physiological quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cientifica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cientifica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种子的品质受到几个因素的影响,如种子的密度和大小。本研究的目的是评估用筛子分类的柠檬木霉、黄毛球孢和扁球孢种子的物理和生理品质。种子通过保留以下尺寸的筛:柠檬酸C.citroidora(2.00;1.68;1.41;1.19;1.00mm)、黄颡菌E.phaeotrica(1.41;119;1.00;0.84mm)和拟隐球菌E.propinqua(1.00;0.84;0.71;0.59e 0.50mm)。进行了保留率、物理纯度、发芽率、发芽初数、发芽速度指数和平均发芽时间的测试。由于保留种子的筛的数量,所使用的设计是随机的,对C.citroiodra和E.propinqa进行四次重复和五次处理,对E.phaeotricha进行四次处理。数据通过F检验进行方差分析。当显著时,使用Tukey检验以5%的概率比较与通过筛网对种子进行分类相关的统计数据。采用筛网分级对分离具有高物理和生理质量的种子是有效的。种子大小为1.41至2.00mm的C.citroidora具有最大的物理和生理品质,并且可以制成丸粒。对于褐毛球孢和近柄球孢来说,大小分别为1.19至1.41毫米和0.84至1.00毫米的种子具有最高的物理和生理品质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eucalyptus citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds subjected to classification by sieves
Seeds’ qualities are influenced by several factors such as the density and size of seeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physiological quality of Corymbia citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds that were subjected to classification by sieve. The seeds passed through sieves that retained the following sizes: C. citriodora (2.00; 1.68; 1.41; 1.19; 1.00 mm), E. phaeotricha (1.41; 1.19; 1.00; 0.84 mm) and E. propinqua (1.00; 0.84; 0.71; 0.59 e 0.50 mm). The tests of retention percentage, physical purity, germination, first count of germination, germination speed index and average germination time were performed. The design used was randomized with four replications and five treatments for C. citriodora and E. propinqua, and four treatments for E. phaeotricha, due to the number of sieves that retained seeds. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test. When significant, the statistics related to the classification of seeds by sieves were compared using the Tukey test with 5% probability. The use of sieve classification is effective for the separation of seeds with high physical and physiological quality. C. citriodora with a seed size of 1.41 to 2.00 mm have maximum physical and physiological quality and can be pelleted. For E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua, seeds with a size of 1.19 to 1.41 mm and 0.84 to 1.00 mm, respectively, have the highest physical and physiological quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cientifica
Cientifica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Eucalyptus citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds subjected to classification by sieves Use of bioinsecticide and sugarcane molasses in the management of Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) and Metamasius spp. (Horn) Spray nozzles and curtain of chains in fungicide application to control Asian soybean rust Desordens nutricionais provocadas por deficiência e excesso de zinco em plantas de milho Efeito da bagana de carnaúba nos atributos microbiológicos, umidade e temperatura do solo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1