{"title":"超镜夹与金属夹联合尼龙绳缝合胃壁全层缺损的比较(附视频)","authors":"Xu Li, Chang-Heon Yang, Chao-yang Xu, Xiaoling Zheng, Wan-yin Deng, Jinhui Zheng, Shishun Zhong, Xianbin Guo, Wei Liang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different stitching methods, over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) and metal clips combined with nylon rope(King closure), for full-layer gastric wall defect. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 75 cases, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastric SMTs from May 2015 to May 2018 in our endoscopy center were retrospectively analyzed. According to the closure method, the patients were divided into the OTSC group (20 cases) and the King closure group (55 cases). Comparison was made in gender, age, the largest diameter of tumor, the location of tumor, defect surface diameter, total operating time, defect closure time, closure success rate, the length of hospital stays, cost and postoperative complications between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe baseline data were comparable, and there were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, tumor diameter, and defect surface diameter between the two groups(all P>0.05). The success rate of closure was 100% in both groups. In terms of length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.13, P=0.268). The total operating time was 63.24±43.22 min in the King closure group versus 47.60±18.13 min in the OTSC group (t=2.20, P=0.030). The closure time of the defect surface was 20.85±16.35 min in the King closure group versus 10.95±5.20 min in the OTSC group (t=2.65, P=0.010). Hospitalization costs were 24 200±800 yuan in the King closure group versus 36 200±2 350 yuan in the OTSC group (t=6.21, P<0.001). Postoperative abdominal elevation radiographs in both groups indicated a small amount of subphrenic free gas, and no intervention was given due to the small amount of gas and no obvious symptoms. No late bleeding, recurrent perforation, infection or other complications occurred after operation, and all patients were discharged successfully. Six months after surgery, 15 patients (27%) in the King closure group developed metal clips or nylon rope residue, which were successfully removed by endoscopy. The anastomosis clamp of nighteen patients (95%) in the OTSC group were in the original position. None of the patient received open surgery. \n \n \nConclusion \nOTSC and King closure are both safe and effective in the treatment of full-thickness defect of gastric wall. OTSC has the advantages of short total operation time and short closure time, but with high cost. \n \n \nKey words: \nEndoscopes, gastrointestinal; Submucosal tumors; Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Over-the-scope-clip system; King closure","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"495-499"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of over-the-scope-clip and metal clips combined with nylon rope as endoscopic suture methods for full-thickness defect of gastric wall(with video)\",\"authors\":\"Xu Li, Chang-Heon Yang, Chao-yang Xu, Xiaoling Zheng, Wan-yin Deng, Jinhui Zheng, Shishun Zhong, Xianbin Guo, Wei Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different stitching methods, over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) and metal clips combined with nylon rope(King closure), for full-layer gastric wall defect. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nData of 75 cases, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastric SMTs from May 2015 to May 2018 in our endoscopy center were retrospectively analyzed. According to the closure method, the patients were divided into the OTSC group (20 cases) and the King closure group (55 cases). Comparison was made in gender, age, the largest diameter of tumor, the location of tumor, defect surface diameter, total operating time, defect closure time, closure success rate, the length of hospital stays, cost and postoperative complications between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe baseline data were comparable, and there were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, tumor diameter, and defect surface diameter between the two groups(all P>0.05). The success rate of closure was 100% in both groups. In terms of length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.13, P=0.268). The total operating time was 63.24±43.22 min in the King closure group versus 47.60±18.13 min in the OTSC group (t=2.20, P=0.030). The closure time of the defect surface was 20.85±16.35 min in the King closure group versus 10.95±5.20 min in the OTSC group (t=2.65, P=0.010). Hospitalization costs were 24 200±800 yuan in the King closure group versus 36 200±2 350 yuan in the OTSC group (t=6.21, P<0.001). Postoperative abdominal elevation radiographs in both groups indicated a small amount of subphrenic free gas, and no intervention was given due to the small amount of gas and no obvious symptoms. No late bleeding, recurrent perforation, infection or other complications occurred after operation, and all patients were discharged successfully. Six months after surgery, 15 patients (27%) in the King closure group developed metal clips or nylon rope residue, which were successfully removed by endoscopy. The anastomosis clamp of nighteen patients (95%) in the OTSC group were in the original position. None of the patient received open surgery. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nOTSC and King closure are both safe and effective in the treatment of full-thickness defect of gastric wall. OTSC has the advantages of short total operation time and short closure time, but with high cost. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nEndoscopes, gastrointestinal; Submucosal tumors; Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Over-the-scope-clip system; King closure\",\"PeriodicalId\":10072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"495-499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的评价超镜夹(OTSC)与金属夹联合尼龙绳(King闭合)两种缝合方法治疗全层胃壁缺损的临床疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析我院内镜中心2015年5月至2018年5月行胃粘膜瘤全层切除术(EFTR)的75例患者的资料。根据闭合方式将患者分为OTSC组(20例)和King闭合组(55例)。比较两组患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤最大直径、肿瘤位置、缺损面直径、总手术时间、缺损闭合时间、闭合成功率、住院时间、费用及术后并发症。结果基线资料具有可比性,两组患者在年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、肿瘤直径、缺损面直径等方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组结扎成功率均为100%。两组住院时间差异无统计学意义(t=1.13, P=0.268)。King闭合组总手术时间为63.24±43.22 min, OTSC组为47.60±18.13 min (t=2.20, P=0.030)。King闭合组缺损表面闭合时间为20.85±16.35 min, OTSC组为10.95±5.20 min (t=2.65, P=0.010)。King闭合组住院费用为24 200±800元,OTSC组住院费用为36 200±2 350元(t=6.21, P<0.001)。两组术后腹部抬高片均提示膈下游离气体量少,因气体量少且无明显症状,不予干预。术后无迟发出血、复发穿孔、感染等并发症发生,均顺利出院。术后6个月,King闭合组15例(27%)患者出现金属夹或尼龙绳残留,经内镜检查成功清除。OTSC组有15例(95%)患者吻合钳处于原位。所有患者均未接受开腹手术。结论OTSC和King缝合术治疗胃壁全层缺损安全有效。OTSC具有总运行时间短、关闭时间短的优点,但成本较高。关键词:内窥镜;胃肠道;黏膜下肿瘤;内镜下全层切除术;Over-the-scope-clip系统;王关闭
Comparison of over-the-scope-clip and metal clips combined with nylon rope as endoscopic suture methods for full-thickness defect of gastric wall(with video)
Objective
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different stitching methods, over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) and metal clips combined with nylon rope(King closure), for full-layer gastric wall defect.
Methods
Data of 75 cases, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastric SMTs from May 2015 to May 2018 in our endoscopy center were retrospectively analyzed. According to the closure method, the patients were divided into the OTSC group (20 cases) and the King closure group (55 cases). Comparison was made in gender, age, the largest diameter of tumor, the location of tumor, defect surface diameter, total operating time, defect closure time, closure success rate, the length of hospital stays, cost and postoperative complications between the two groups.
Results
The baseline data were comparable, and there were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, tumor diameter, and defect surface diameter between the two groups(all P>0.05). The success rate of closure was 100% in both groups. In terms of length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.13, P=0.268). The total operating time was 63.24±43.22 min in the King closure group versus 47.60±18.13 min in the OTSC group (t=2.20, P=0.030). The closure time of the defect surface was 20.85±16.35 min in the King closure group versus 10.95±5.20 min in the OTSC group (t=2.65, P=0.010). Hospitalization costs were 24 200±800 yuan in the King closure group versus 36 200±2 350 yuan in the OTSC group (t=6.21, P<0.001). Postoperative abdominal elevation radiographs in both groups indicated a small amount of subphrenic free gas, and no intervention was given due to the small amount of gas and no obvious symptoms. No late bleeding, recurrent perforation, infection or other complications occurred after operation, and all patients were discharged successfully. Six months after surgery, 15 patients (27%) in the King closure group developed metal clips or nylon rope residue, which were successfully removed by endoscopy. The anastomosis clamp of nighteen patients (95%) in the OTSC group were in the original position. None of the patient received open surgery.
Conclusion
OTSC and King closure are both safe and effective in the treatment of full-thickness defect of gastric wall. OTSC has the advantages of short total operation time and short closure time, but with high cost.
Key words:
Endoscopes, gastrointestinal; Submucosal tumors; Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Over-the-scope-clip system; King closure
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience.
The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications.
The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.