恢复残疾人的创造力:文化模式如何使残疾人的创造力清晰可辨

IF 1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Culture & Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-15 DOI:10.1177/1354067X211066816
David C. Jones
{"title":"恢复残疾人的创造力:文化模式如何使残疾人的创造力清晰可辨","authors":"David C. Jones","doi":"10.1177/1354067X211066816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of creativity studies underrepresents—even excludes—creators who have disabilities. The underrepresentation partly reflects an approach that pathologizes disability. Disability as a pathology or marker of ineligibility makes the contributions of people with disabilities invisible or illegible to creativity research. However, disability operates as a marker of membership in a larger disability culture. Considering disability and creativity as cultural phenomena locates a means for including disabled creators in creativity studies. Cultural models describe creativity in terms of groups sharing values, experiences, and resources. People with disabilities participate in subcultures (e.g., deaf communities) and/or larger cultures (i.e., disability culture). Disability cultures encapsulate shared experiences and values as well as resources. In the following article, I pair three propositions from cultural creativity models with evidence from creators with disabilities to demonstrate that (a) members of disability culture experience the world in ways that generate creative expression, (b) encountering a world designed for abled bodies incites the creativity of disabled people, and (c) disabled and abled people collaboratively create. However, not all methodological approaches effectively include creators with disabilities. Qualitative approaches suit best when the researcher practices reflexivity and allows creators with disabilities the right to manage their own representation within the project.","PeriodicalId":47241,"journal":{"name":"Culture & Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"491 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclaiming disabled creativity: How cultural models make legible the creativity of people with disabilities\",\"authors\":\"David C. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1354067X211066816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of creativity studies underrepresents—even excludes—creators who have disabilities. The underrepresentation partly reflects an approach that pathologizes disability. Disability as a pathology or marker of ineligibility makes the contributions of people with disabilities invisible or illegible to creativity research. However, disability operates as a marker of membership in a larger disability culture. Considering disability and creativity as cultural phenomena locates a means for including disabled creators in creativity studies. Cultural models describe creativity in terms of groups sharing values, experiences, and resources. People with disabilities participate in subcultures (e.g., deaf communities) and/or larger cultures (i.e., disability culture). Disability cultures encapsulate shared experiences and values as well as resources. In the following article, I pair three propositions from cultural creativity models with evidence from creators with disabilities to demonstrate that (a) members of disability culture experience the world in ways that generate creative expression, (b) encountering a world designed for abled bodies incites the creativity of disabled people, and (c) disabled and abled people collaboratively create. However, not all methodological approaches effectively include creators with disabilities. Qualitative approaches suit best when the researcher practices reflexivity and allows creators with disabilities the right to manage their own representation within the project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"491 - 505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211066816\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211066816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

创造力研究领域的代表性不足,甚至排除了有残疾的创造者。代表性不足在一定程度上反映了一种将残疾病态化的方法。残疾作为一种病理学或不合格的标志,使残疾人对创造力研究的贡献不可见或难以辨认。然而,在更大的残疾文化中,残疾是成员的标志。将残疾与创造力作为一种文化现象来看待,为将残疾创造者纳入创造力研究提供了一种途径。文化模型用群体共享价值观、经验和资源来描述创造力。残疾人参与亚文化(如聋人社区)和/或更大的文化(如残疾文化)。残疾人文化包含了共同的经验、价值观和资源。在下一篇文章中,我将文化创造力模型中的三个命题与残疾人创造者的证据相结合,以证明(a)残疾人文化的成员以产生创造性表达的方式体验世界,(b)遇到为残疾人设计的世界激发了残疾人的创造力,以及(c)残疾人和残疾人合作创造。然而,并不是所有的方法方法都有效地包括残疾创作者。当研究者实践反身性并允许残疾创作者在项目中管理自己的表现时,定性方法最适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reclaiming disabled creativity: How cultural models make legible the creativity of people with disabilities
The field of creativity studies underrepresents—even excludes—creators who have disabilities. The underrepresentation partly reflects an approach that pathologizes disability. Disability as a pathology or marker of ineligibility makes the contributions of people with disabilities invisible or illegible to creativity research. However, disability operates as a marker of membership in a larger disability culture. Considering disability and creativity as cultural phenomena locates a means for including disabled creators in creativity studies. Cultural models describe creativity in terms of groups sharing values, experiences, and resources. People with disabilities participate in subcultures (e.g., deaf communities) and/or larger cultures (i.e., disability culture). Disability cultures encapsulate shared experiences and values as well as resources. In the following article, I pair three propositions from cultural creativity models with evidence from creators with disabilities to demonstrate that (a) members of disability culture experience the world in ways that generate creative expression, (b) encountering a world designed for abled bodies incites the creativity of disabled people, and (c) disabled and abled people collaboratively create. However, not all methodological approaches effectively include creators with disabilities. Qualitative approaches suit best when the researcher practices reflexivity and allows creators with disabilities the right to manage their own representation within the project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Culture & Psychology
Culture & Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Culture & Psychology addresses the centrality of culture necessary for a basic understanding of the psychology of human beings: their identity, social conduct, intra- and intersubjective experiences, emotions and semiotic creativity. By drawing on diverse theoretical backgrounds, the editorial aim is to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly investigations and discussions that will advance our basic knowledge of the self in its historical and cultural contexts. The orientation of the journal is towards formulating new conceptualizations of culture in psychology, together with theoretically relevant empirical investigations.
期刊最新文献
Moving up the stream beyond resistance to counter move The homeless mind in a mobile world: An autoethnographic approach on cognitive immobility in international migration Cultural and idiographic approach to the microgenesis of visual metaphors Exploring experiences of proculturation in international students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identity and parent-child relationship representations of Nezha: From cultural narrative to case conceptualization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1