视力困难和痴呆:老年人及其照顾者的经济困难

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-08-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2023.1210204
Priyanka Kumar, Grace Chung, Emmanuel Garcia-Morales, Nicholas S Reed, Orla C Sheehan, Joshua R Ehrlich, Bonnielin K Swenor, Varshini Varadaraj
{"title":"视力困难和痴呆:老年人及其照顾者的经济困难","authors":"Priyanka Kumar, Grace Chung, Emmanuel Garcia-Morales, Nicholas S Reed, Orla C Sheehan, Joshua R Ehrlich, Bonnielin K Swenor, Varshini Varadaraj","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2023.1210204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited research has examined the economic impact of vision difficulty (VD) and dementia on older adults and their caregivers. We aimed to determine whether older adults with VD and/or dementia, and their caregivers, face more economic hardships than their counterparts without VD or dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based survey of Medicare beneficiaries, linked to their family/unpaid caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC). Regression models characterized the association of VD (self-report), dementia (survey and cognitive assessments), and co-occurring VD and dementia with debt, receiving financial help from relatives, government-based Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), other food assistance, utility assistance, and caregiver financial difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NHATS sample included 6,879 community-dwelling older adults (5670 no VD/dementia, 494 VD-alone, 512 dementia-alone, 203 co-occurring VD and dementia). Adults with VD and dementia had higher odds of receiving SNAP benefits (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.4-4.8) and other food assistance (OR = 4.1, 95%CI = 1.8-9.1) than adults without VD/dementia, while no differences were noted for debt, financial help, and utility assistance. Adults with VD-alone had higher odds of debt (OR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.3-3.2), receiving financial help (OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.1-2.5) and other food assistance (OR = 2.7, 95%CI = 1.7-4.3); while adults with dementia-alone had higher odds of debt (OR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.4-5.5). The NSOC sample included 1,759 caregivers (995 caring for adults without VD/dementia, 223 for VD-alone, 368 for dementia-alone, and 173 for co-occurring VD and dementia). Compared to caregivers of older adults without VD/dementia, caregivers of adults with VD and dementia had higher odds of financial difficulty (OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.7-5.3) while caregivers of adults with VD-alone or dementia-alone did not.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While older adults with VD- or dementia-alone experienced increased economic hardships, disparities in food assistance were amplified among older adults with co-occurring disease. Caregivers of adults with co-occurring disease experienced more financial difficulty than caregivers of adults with a single or no disease. This study highlights the need for interventions across clinical and social services to support the economic wellbeing of our aging population and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1210204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vision difficulty and dementia: economic hardships among older adults and their caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Kumar, Grace Chung, Emmanuel Garcia-Morales, Nicholas S Reed, Orla C Sheehan, Joshua R Ehrlich, Bonnielin K Swenor, Varshini Varadaraj\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fepid.2023.1210204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited research has examined the economic impact of vision difficulty (VD) and dementia on older adults and their caregivers. We aimed to determine whether older adults with VD and/or dementia, and their caregivers, face more economic hardships than their counterparts without VD or dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based survey of Medicare beneficiaries, linked to their family/unpaid caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC). Regression models characterized the association of VD (self-report), dementia (survey and cognitive assessments), and co-occurring VD and dementia with debt, receiving financial help from relatives, government-based Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), other food assistance, utility assistance, and caregiver financial difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NHATS sample included 6,879 community-dwelling older adults (5670 no VD/dementia, 494 VD-alone, 512 dementia-alone, 203 co-occurring VD and dementia). Adults with VD and dementia had higher odds of receiving SNAP benefits (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.4-4.8) and other food assistance (OR = 4.1, 95%CI = 1.8-9.1) than adults without VD/dementia, while no differences were noted for debt, financial help, and utility assistance. Adults with VD-alone had higher odds of debt (OR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.3-3.2), receiving financial help (OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.1-2.5) and other food assistance (OR = 2.7, 95%CI = 1.7-4.3); while adults with dementia-alone had higher odds of debt (OR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.4-5.5). The NSOC sample included 1,759 caregivers (995 caring for adults without VD/dementia, 223 for VD-alone, 368 for dementia-alone, and 173 for co-occurring VD and dementia). Compared to caregivers of older adults without VD/dementia, caregivers of adults with VD and dementia had higher odds of financial difficulty (OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.7-5.3) while caregivers of adults with VD-alone or dementia-alone did not.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While older adults with VD- or dementia-alone experienced increased economic hardships, disparities in food assistance were amplified among older adults with co-occurring disease. Caregivers of adults with co-occurring disease experienced more financial difficulty than caregivers of adults with a single or no disease. This study highlights the need for interventions across clinical and social services to support the economic wellbeing of our aging population and their caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1210204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910956/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1210204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1210204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有限的研究调查了视力困难(VD)和痴呆症对老年人及其照顾者的经济影响。我们的目的是确定患有VD和/或痴呆的老年人及其照顾者是否比没有VD或痴呆的老年人面临更多的经济困难。我们使用了2015年国家健康和老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)的横断面数据,这是一项基于人口的医疗保险受益人调查,与他们的家庭/来自国家护理研究(NSOC)的无偿护理人员相关。回归模型表征了VD(自我报告)、痴呆(调查和认知评估)以及与债务、接受亲属经济援助、政府补充营养援助计划(SNAP)、其他食品援助、公用事业援助和照顾者经济困难共同发生的VD和痴呆的关联。NHATS样本包括6879名社区老年人(5670名无VD/痴呆,494名单独VD, 512名单独痴呆,203名同时发生VD和痴呆)。与没有VD/痴呆的成年人相比,患有VD和痴呆的成年人获得SNAP福利(OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.4-4.8)和其他食品援助(OR = 4.1, 95%CI = 1.8-9.1)的几率更高,而在债务、财务帮助和公用事业援助方面没有差异。单独使用dvd的成年人有较高的债务(OR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.3-3.2)、接受经济援助(OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.1-2.5)和其他食品援助(OR = 2.7, 95%CI = 1.7 - 4.3)的几率;而单独患有痴呆症的成年人负债的几率更高(OR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.4-5.5)。NSOC样本包括1,759名照顾者(995名照顾无VD/痴呆的成年人,223名照顾单独VD/痴呆的成年人,368名照顾单独VD/痴呆的成年人,173名照顾同时发生VD和痴呆的成年人)。与没有VD/痴呆的老年人的照顾者相比,有VD和痴呆的成年人的照顾者有更高的经济困难的几率(OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.7-5.3),而单独有VD或单独有痴呆的成年人的照顾者没有。虽然单独患有VD或痴呆的老年人经历了越来越多的经济困难,但在患有合并疾病的老年人中,食品援助的差异被放大了。与患有单一疾病或无疾病的成年人的照顾者相比,患有合并疾病的成年人的照顾者经历了更多的经济困难。这项研究强调了临床和社会服务干预的必要性,以支持我们老龄化人口及其护理人员的经济福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vision difficulty and dementia: economic hardships among older adults and their caregivers.

Introduction: Limited research has examined the economic impact of vision difficulty (VD) and dementia on older adults and their caregivers. We aimed to determine whether older adults with VD and/or dementia, and their caregivers, face more economic hardships than their counterparts without VD or dementia.

Methods: We used cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based survey of Medicare beneficiaries, linked to their family/unpaid caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC). Regression models characterized the association of VD (self-report), dementia (survey and cognitive assessments), and co-occurring VD and dementia with debt, receiving financial help from relatives, government-based Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), other food assistance, utility assistance, and caregiver financial difficulty.

Results: The NHATS sample included 6,879 community-dwelling older adults (5670 no VD/dementia, 494 VD-alone, 512 dementia-alone, 203 co-occurring VD and dementia). Adults with VD and dementia had higher odds of receiving SNAP benefits (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.4-4.8) and other food assistance (OR = 4.1, 95%CI = 1.8-9.1) than adults without VD/dementia, while no differences were noted for debt, financial help, and utility assistance. Adults with VD-alone had higher odds of debt (OR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.3-3.2), receiving financial help (OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.1-2.5) and other food assistance (OR = 2.7, 95%CI = 1.7-4.3); while adults with dementia-alone had higher odds of debt (OR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.4-5.5). The NSOC sample included 1,759 caregivers (995 caring for adults without VD/dementia, 223 for VD-alone, 368 for dementia-alone, and 173 for co-occurring VD and dementia). Compared to caregivers of older adults without VD/dementia, caregivers of adults with VD and dementia had higher odds of financial difficulty (OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.7-5.3) while caregivers of adults with VD-alone or dementia-alone did not.

Discussion: While older adults with VD- or dementia-alone experienced increased economic hardships, disparities in food assistance were amplified among older adults with co-occurring disease. Caregivers of adults with co-occurring disease experienced more financial difficulty than caregivers of adults with a single or no disease. This study highlights the need for interventions across clinical and social services to support the economic wellbeing of our aging population and their caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of cognitive bias about infectious diseases on social well-being. The spatio-temporal evolution of leishmaniasis in the province of Essaouira. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated factors among adult diabetic patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Using a computational cognitive model to simulate the effects of personal and social network experiences on seasonal influenza vaccination decisions. Prevalence of occupational injuries and associated factors among solid waste collectors in Jigjiga city, eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1