{"title":"一个冒名顶替者六千个口罩","authors":"P. O’Kane","doi":"10.1386/jwcp_00021_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having recently given, and published in Third Text referee journal and Third Text Online, a series of articles on mask, class and carnival, I was recently invited to write a text to accompany an exhibition relating to masks. Mask, Masque, Masc was a group exhibition hosted\n online between 14 and 31 May 2020. It was curated by Marc Hulson, Alessandra Falbo and Rolina E. Blok, and hosted by Five Years and Darling Pearls & Co at Platforms Project Net 2020 (see: http://www.fiveyears.org.uk/archive2/pages/277/Masc_Mask_Masque/277.html.\n Accessed 28 July 2021). This article is a transformed version of that text, edited and extended to suit this journal and the requirements and suggestions of the journal’s reviewers. It starts out with an epigraph taken from Nietzsche, followed by two quotes from Walter Benjamin\n that relate writing playfully to ‘magic’. It later turns towards a conclusion with two more fulsome quotes from F.W. Nietzsche, which dispute the priority of truth and claim that every word is a mask. The piece aims to encourage and support newcomers to writing, as\n well as non-native speakers and those from less privileged backgrounds; any and all of whom might nervously feel that their own writing is in some way illegitimate. I draw upon my experience as an arts lecturer and arts writer, as the article becomes an example of an autobiographical strain\n in my work that uses first-person narratives to explore ways in which writing, education (in general) and art education (in particular) might contribute to or help us negotiate class consciousness and cultural barriers. The article discusses ways in which new technologies invite and allow\n new voices to gain confidence in writing, and also alludes to ‘masks’, ‘imposters’ and ‘imposter syndrome’ (initially nominated as a feminist concern). It attempts to help and to advise aspiring writers by ‘dis-spelling’ myths of writing as transcendent,\n privileged and thereby socially divisive, and promotes the idea of writing as a material process (no less ‘magical’ for that) open to all. Interestingly, the title of this article alludes to its own word count, and thus the title had to be changed each time the article was edited\n and as it grew into the approximately 6,000-word essay it is now. As well as being, in this and other ways, self-reflexive and self-conscious, the writing becomes self-deconstructive towards its conclusion, tugging at a certain ‘masc’-ulinity concerning the sources and motivations\n for the writing and of the author that might otherwise remain masked to the author. This allows the piece to end by extending the implications of a purported écriture feminine to become an encouragement to more and different ‘others’ to find a way, and to find their\n way, to and through writing, meanwhile expanding on the many ways in which we might deploy a new-found freedom to write according to the model of words as masks, of writing as a masque and of the author as masked.","PeriodicalId":38498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six thousand masks for one imposter\",\"authors\":\"P. O’Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jwcp_00021_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Having recently given, and published in Third Text referee journal and Third Text Online, a series of articles on mask, class and carnival, I was recently invited to write a text to accompany an exhibition relating to masks. Mask, Masque, Masc was a group exhibition hosted\\n online between 14 and 31 May 2020. It was curated by Marc Hulson, Alessandra Falbo and Rolina E. Blok, and hosted by Five Years and Darling Pearls & Co at Platforms Project Net 2020 (see: http://www.fiveyears.org.uk/archive2/pages/277/Masc_Mask_Masque/277.html.\\n Accessed 28 July 2021). This article is a transformed version of that text, edited and extended to suit this journal and the requirements and suggestions of the journal’s reviewers. It starts out with an epigraph taken from Nietzsche, followed by two quotes from Walter Benjamin\\n that relate writing playfully to ‘magic’. It later turns towards a conclusion with two more fulsome quotes from F.W. Nietzsche, which dispute the priority of truth and claim that every word is a mask. The piece aims to encourage and support newcomers to writing, as\\n well as non-native speakers and those from less privileged backgrounds; any and all of whom might nervously feel that their own writing is in some way illegitimate. I draw upon my experience as an arts lecturer and arts writer, as the article becomes an example of an autobiographical strain\\n in my work that uses first-person narratives to explore ways in which writing, education (in general) and art education (in particular) might contribute to or help us negotiate class consciousness and cultural barriers. The article discusses ways in which new technologies invite and allow\\n new voices to gain confidence in writing, and also alludes to ‘masks’, ‘imposters’ and ‘imposter syndrome’ (initially nominated as a feminist concern). It attempts to help and to advise aspiring writers by ‘dis-spelling’ myths of writing as transcendent,\\n privileged and thereby socially divisive, and promotes the idea of writing as a material process (no less ‘magical’ for that) open to all. Interestingly, the title of this article alludes to its own word count, and thus the title had to be changed each time the article was edited\\n and as it grew into the approximately 6,000-word essay it is now. As well as being, in this and other ways, self-reflexive and self-conscious, the writing becomes self-deconstructive towards its conclusion, tugging at a certain ‘masc’-ulinity concerning the sources and motivations\\n for the writing and of the author that might otherwise remain masked to the author. This allows the piece to end by extending the implications of a purported écriture feminine to become an encouragement to more and different ‘others’ to find a way, and to find their\\n way, to and through writing, meanwhile expanding on the many ways in which we might deploy a new-found freedom to write according to the model of words as masks, of writing as a masque and of the author as masked.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00021_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00021_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,我发表了一系列关于口罩、课堂和狂欢节的文章,并发表在《第三文本裁判》杂志和《第三文字在线》上。最近,我受邀写了一篇与口罩有关的展览文章。Mask,Masque,Masc是2020年5月14日至31日在网上举办的一个群展。它由Marc Hulson、Alessandra Falbo和Rolina E.Blok策划,并由Five Years和Darling Pearls&Co在Platforms Project Net 2020上主持(见:http://www.fiveyears.org.uk/archive2/pages/277/Masc_Mask_Masque/277.html.访问日期:2021年7月28日)。这篇文章是该文本的转换版本,经过编辑和扩展,以适应本期刊以及期刊审稿人的要求和建议。它以尼采的题词开始,然后是沃尔特·本雅明的两句名言,将写作戏谑地与“魔法”联系起来。后来,它又引用了F.W.尼采的两句精彩的话作为结论,这两句话对真理的优先性提出了质疑,并声称每个单词都是一个面具。这篇文章旨在鼓励和支持新来的写作者,以及非母语人士和来自弱势背景的人;他们中的任何人都可能紧张地认为自己的写作在某种程度上是非法的。我借鉴了我作为艺术讲师和艺术作家的经验,因为这篇文章成为了我作品中自传体风格的一个例子,它使用第一人称叙事来探索写作、教育(一般而言)和艺术教育(特别是)可能有助于或帮助我们克服阶级意识和文化障碍的方式。这篇文章讨论了新技术邀请和允许新声音在写作中获得信心的方式,还提到了“面具”、“冒名顶替者”和“冒名者综合症”(最初被提名为女权主义关注的问题)。它试图通过“解构”写作的神话来帮助和建议有抱负的作家,认为写作是超然的、特权的,从而导致社会分裂,并提倡写作是一种向所有人开放的物质过程(同样是“神奇的”)。有趣的是,这篇文章的标题暗示了它自己的字数,因此每次编辑这篇文章时,标题都必须更改,随着它发展成为现在大约6000字的文章。除了在这方面和其他方面具有自我反射和自我意识外,写作在结束时也变得自我解构,在写作和作者的来源和动机方面产生了某种“男性主义”,否则作者可能会对此视而不见。这使得这篇文章的结尾扩展了所谓的女性标准的含义,鼓励更多不同的“其他人”找到一种方式,找到自己的方式,去写作,并通过写作,同时扩展了我们可以利用新发现的自由的多种方式,根据文字作为面具的模式来写作,把写作当作面具,把作者当作面具。
Having recently given, and published in Third Text referee journal and Third Text Online, a series of articles on mask, class and carnival, I was recently invited to write a text to accompany an exhibition relating to masks. Mask, Masque, Masc was a group exhibition hosted
online between 14 and 31 May 2020. It was curated by Marc Hulson, Alessandra Falbo and Rolina E. Blok, and hosted by Five Years and Darling Pearls & Co at Platforms Project Net 2020 (see: http://www.fiveyears.org.uk/archive2/pages/277/Masc_Mask_Masque/277.html.
Accessed 28 July 2021). This article is a transformed version of that text, edited and extended to suit this journal and the requirements and suggestions of the journal’s reviewers. It starts out with an epigraph taken from Nietzsche, followed by two quotes from Walter Benjamin
that relate writing playfully to ‘magic’. It later turns towards a conclusion with two more fulsome quotes from F.W. Nietzsche, which dispute the priority of truth and claim that every word is a mask. The piece aims to encourage and support newcomers to writing, as
well as non-native speakers and those from less privileged backgrounds; any and all of whom might nervously feel that their own writing is in some way illegitimate. I draw upon my experience as an arts lecturer and arts writer, as the article becomes an example of an autobiographical strain
in my work that uses first-person narratives to explore ways in which writing, education (in general) and art education (in particular) might contribute to or help us negotiate class consciousness and cultural barriers. The article discusses ways in which new technologies invite and allow
new voices to gain confidence in writing, and also alludes to ‘masks’, ‘imposters’ and ‘imposter syndrome’ (initially nominated as a feminist concern). It attempts to help and to advise aspiring writers by ‘dis-spelling’ myths of writing as transcendent,
privileged and thereby socially divisive, and promotes the idea of writing as a material process (no less ‘magical’ for that) open to all. Interestingly, the title of this article alludes to its own word count, and thus the title had to be changed each time the article was edited
and as it grew into the approximately 6,000-word essay it is now. As well as being, in this and other ways, self-reflexive and self-conscious, the writing becomes self-deconstructive towards its conclusion, tugging at a certain ‘masc’-ulinity concerning the sources and motivations
for the writing and of the author that might otherwise remain masked to the author. This allows the piece to end by extending the implications of a purported écriture feminine to become an encouragement to more and different ‘others’ to find a way, and to find their
way, to and through writing, meanwhile expanding on the many ways in which we might deploy a new-found freedom to write according to the model of words as masks, of writing as a masque and of the author as masked.