Armaun D. Rouhi , Jeffrey L. Roberson , Emily Kindall , Yazid K. Ghanem , William S. Yi , Noel N. Williams , Kristoffel R. Dumon
{"title":"评估YouTube作为在线教育工具在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术教学:一项LAP-VEGaS研究","authors":"Armaun D. Rouhi , Jeffrey L. Roberson , Emily Kindall , Yazid K. Ghanem , William S. Yi , Noel N. Williams , Kristoffel R. Dumon","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>General surgery residents frequently access YouTube® for educational walkthroughs of surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the educational quality of YouTube® video walkthroughs on Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using a validated video assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of YouTube® videos was conducted for “laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass”, “laparoscopic RYGB”, and “laparoscopic gastric bypass.” The top 100 videos from three YouTube® searches were gathered and duplicates were removed. Included videos were categorized as Physician (produced by individual physician), Academic (university/medical school), or Society (professional surgical society) and rated by three independent investigators using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool (0–18). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and Spearman's correlation test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 300 videos gathered, 31 unique videos met selection criteria and were analyzed. The average LAP-VEGaS score was 8.67 (SD 3.51). Society videos demonstrated a significantly higher mean LAP-VEGaS score than Physician videos (<em>p</em> = 0.023). Most videos lacked formal case presentation (71%), intraoperative findings (81%), and operative time (76%). No correlation was demonstrated between LAP-VEGaS scores and number of likes or views, video length, or upload date.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LRYGB training videos on YouTube® generally do not adhere to the LAP-VEGaS guidelines and are of poor educational quality, signaling areas of improvement for educators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of YouTube as an online educational tool in teaching laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A LAP-VEGaS study\",\"authors\":\"Armaun D. Rouhi , Jeffrey L. Roberson , Emily Kindall , Yazid K. Ghanem , William S. Yi , Noel N. Williams , Kristoffel R. Dumon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>General surgery residents frequently access YouTube® for educational walkthroughs of surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the educational quality of YouTube® video walkthroughs on Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using a validated video assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of YouTube® videos was conducted for “laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass”, “laparoscopic RYGB”, and “laparoscopic gastric bypass.” The top 100 videos from three YouTube® searches were gathered and duplicates were removed. Included videos were categorized as Physician (produced by individual physician), Academic (university/medical school), or Society (professional surgical society) and rated by three independent investigators using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool (0–18). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and Spearman's correlation test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 300 videos gathered, 31 unique videos met selection criteria and were analyzed. The average LAP-VEGaS score was 8.67 (SD 3.51). Society videos demonstrated a significantly higher mean LAP-VEGaS score than Physician videos (<em>p</em> = 0.023). Most videos lacked formal case presentation (71%), intraoperative findings (81%), and operative time (76%). No correlation was demonstrated between LAP-VEGaS scores and number of likes or views, video length, or upload date.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LRYGB training videos on YouTube® generally do not adhere to the LAP-VEGaS guidelines and are of poor educational quality, signaling areas of improvement for educators.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of YouTube as an online educational tool in teaching laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A LAP-VEGaS study
Background
General surgery residents frequently access YouTube® for educational walkthroughs of surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the educational quality of YouTube® video walkthroughs on Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using a validated video assessment tool.
Methods
A retrospective review of YouTube® videos was conducted for “laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass”, “laparoscopic RYGB”, and “laparoscopic gastric bypass.” The top 100 videos from three YouTube® searches were gathered and duplicates were removed. Included videos were categorized as Physician (produced by individual physician), Academic (university/medical school), or Society (professional surgical society) and rated by three independent investigators using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool (0–18). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and Spearman's correlation test.
Results
Of 300 videos gathered, 31 unique videos met selection criteria and were analyzed. The average LAP-VEGaS score was 8.67 (SD 3.51). Society videos demonstrated a significantly higher mean LAP-VEGaS score than Physician videos (p = 0.023). Most videos lacked formal case presentation (71%), intraoperative findings (81%), and operative time (76%). No correlation was demonstrated between LAP-VEGaS scores and number of likes or views, video length, or upload date.
Conclusions
LRYGB training videos on YouTube® generally do not adhere to the LAP-VEGaS guidelines and are of poor educational quality, signaling areas of improvement for educators.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
