{"title":"Deus est Homo","authors":"H. Bogdan","doi":"10.1163/15700593-02101006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite the centrality of the concept of God in Christian theology and Western philosophy for over two millennia, little attention has been given the concept of God in twentieth-century occultism in general, and in the writings of Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) in particular. In this article it is argued that Crowley’s multifaceted and sometimes conflicting approaches to God, are dependent on five main factors: (1) his childhood experiences of Christianity in the form of the Plymouth Brethren, (2) the impact of Empirical Scepticism and Comparative Religion, (3) the emanationist concept of God that he encountered through his membership in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, (4) the revelation of The Book of the Law and the claim of being a Prophet, The Great Beast 666, of a New Age, and finally (5) solar-phallicism as expressed through the Ordo Templi Orientis. These apparently contradictory strands in Crowley’s biography and intellectual armoury are in fact interlinked, and it is by studying them together that it is possible to identify the concept of God in Crowley’s magical writings.","PeriodicalId":41783,"journal":{"name":"Aries-Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aries-Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700593-02101006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管上帝的概念在基督教神学和西方哲学中占据了两千多年的中心地位,但在20世纪的神秘主义中,特别是在阿莱斯特·克劳利(1875-1947)的著作中,很少有人关注上帝的概念。在这篇文章中,我们认为克劳利对上帝的多面性,有时是相互矛盾的方法,取决于五个主要因素:(1)他童年时期在普利茅斯兄弟会的基督教经历,(2)经验怀疑主义和比较宗教的影响,(3)他在金色黎明的赫尔墨斯教团的成员身份中遇到的上帝的散发论概念,(4)《律法书》的启示和新时代的先知,大野兽666的主张,最后(5)通过Ordo Templi Orientis表达的太阳性物论。在克劳利的传记和知识宝库中,这些看似矛盾的线索实际上是相互联系的,只有把它们放在一起研究,才有可能在克劳利的魔法作品中识别出上帝的概念。
Despite the centrality of the concept of God in Christian theology and Western philosophy for over two millennia, little attention has been given the concept of God in twentieth-century occultism in general, and in the writings of Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) in particular. In this article it is argued that Crowley’s multifaceted and sometimes conflicting approaches to God, are dependent on five main factors: (1) his childhood experiences of Christianity in the form of the Plymouth Brethren, (2) the impact of Empirical Scepticism and Comparative Religion, (3) the emanationist concept of God that he encountered through his membership in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, (4) the revelation of The Book of the Law and the claim of being a Prophet, The Great Beast 666, of a New Age, and finally (5) solar-phallicism as expressed through the Ordo Templi Orientis. These apparently contradictory strands in Crowley’s biography and intellectual armoury are in fact interlinked, and it is by studying them together that it is possible to identify the concept of God in Crowley’s magical writings.