Vincent Bouquet (Docteur en droit, Docteur en pharmacie)
{"title":"多种植体假体:在没有国家责任的情况下,可能的赔偿是什么?","authors":"Vincent Bouquet (Docteur en droit, Docteur en pharmacie)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2021.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With two decisions dated November 16th 2020, the French administrative Highest court (“Conseil d’État”) has compromised the possibility for PIP's victims to demonstrate the deficiency of the National medicines agency (ANSM) in its duty of health control. Those decisions transpose to medical devices already well-established principles, used for other healthcare products. There are of interested because they give the Highest court the opportunity to precisely detail the qualification of the facts. Although the consequences for the victims seem to be only of symbolic value, the scope of the solution is not limited to the liability of the State. By reducing the number of potential liable persons, those decisions also seem to jeopardize the compensation of the victims by the national solidarity funds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2022 172","pages":"Pages 15-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2021.05.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poly Implant Prothèse : en l’absence de responsabilité de l’État, quelle indemnisation possible ?\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Bouquet (Docteur en droit, Docteur en pharmacie)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2021.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With two decisions dated November 16th 2020, the French administrative Highest court (“Conseil d’État”) has compromised the possibility for PIP's victims to demonstrate the deficiency of the National medicines agency (ANSM) in its duty of health control. Those decisions transpose to medical devices already well-established principles, used for other healthcare products. There are of interested because they give the Highest court the opportunity to precisely detail the qualification of the facts. Although the consequences for the victims seem to be only of symbolic value, the scope of the solution is not limited to the liability of the State. By reducing the number of potential liable persons, those decisions also seem to jeopardize the compensation of the victims by the national solidarity funds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2022 172\",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2021.05.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739121000592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739121000592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
法国行政最高法院(" Conseil d ' État ")于2020年11月16日作出了两项决定,损害了PIP受害者证明国家药品管理局(ANSM)在健康控制职责方面存在缺陷的可能性。这些决定转移到医疗设备已经确立的原则,用于其他医疗保健产品。之所以有兴趣,是因为它们使最高法院有机会精确地详细说明事实的资格。虽然对受害者造成的后果似乎只具有象征意义,但解决办法的范围并不限于国家的责任。由于减少了可能负有责任的人的数目,这些决定似乎也危及国家团结基金对受害者的赔偿。
Poly Implant Prothèse : en l’absence de responsabilité de l’État, quelle indemnisation possible ?
With two decisions dated November 16th 2020, the French administrative Highest court (“Conseil d’État”) has compromised the possibility for PIP's victims to demonstrate the deficiency of the National medicines agency (ANSM) in its duty of health control. Those decisions transpose to medical devices already well-established principles, used for other healthcare products. There are of interested because they give the Highest court the opportunity to precisely detail the qualification of the facts. Although the consequences for the victims seem to be only of symbolic value, the scope of the solution is not limited to the liability of the State. By reducing the number of potential liable persons, those decisions also seem to jeopardize the compensation of the victims by the national solidarity funds.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues