印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号判决后,法律正义视角下的特定时间工作协议劳资关系

Fithriatus Shalihah
{"title":"印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号判决后,法律正义视角下的特定时间工作协议劳资关系","authors":"Fithriatus Shalihah","doi":"10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a22545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to The Problem: The constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 stated that the establishment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation contradicts the 1945 Constitution and is considered conditional unconstitutional. Thus, within two years of Law No. 11 of 2020, its derivative rules are still enforced until there is an improvement. However, two years is a legal certainty, but it is uncertain in the business and industrial worlds. Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to find out how the effect of the issuance of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the implementation of Law No. 11 of 2020 on the Employment Cluster and its derivative rules and how alternative efforts in creating harmonious industrial relations on the issue of working relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is doctrinal legal research. Findings: This research resulted in a study that the influence of constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 impacts the uncertainty of legal protection guarantees in the business and the industrial world. Because it takes two years to implement the provisions of Law No. 11 of 2020 in the Employment cluster and its derivative rules, namely Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, the business and the industrial world cannot implement the provisions without any guarantee of sustainable time, and it will lead to injustice in industrial relations. One alternative to continue creating harmonious industrial relations with Specific Time Work Agreements is to return to local wisdom, prioritizing the principle of consensus deliberation that prioritizes the parties' agreement in working relations including the fulfillment of rights in compensation payments when there is a termination of employment.","PeriodicalId":32116,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial Relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in The Perspective of Legal Justice\",\"authors\":\"Fithriatus Shalihah\",\"doi\":\"10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a22545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction to The Problem: The constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 stated that the establishment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation contradicts the 1945 Constitution and is considered conditional unconstitutional. Thus, within two years of Law No. 11 of 2020, its derivative rules are still enforced until there is an improvement. However, two years is a legal certainty, but it is uncertain in the business and industrial worlds. Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to find out how the effect of the issuance of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the implementation of Law No. 11 of 2020 on the Employment Cluster and its derivative rules and how alternative efforts in creating harmonious industrial relations on the issue of working relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is doctrinal legal research. Findings: This research resulted in a study that the influence of constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 impacts the uncertainty of legal protection guarantees in the business and the industrial world. Because it takes two years to implement the provisions of Law No. 11 of 2020 in the Employment cluster and its derivative rules, namely Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, the business and the industrial world cannot implement the provisions without any guarantee of sustainable time, and it will lead to injustice in industrial relations. One alternative to continue creating harmonious industrial relations with Specific Time Work Agreements is to return to local wisdom, prioritizing the principle of consensus deliberation that prioritizes the parties' agreement in working relations including the fulfillment of rights in compensation payments when there is a termination of employment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Novelty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Novelty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a22545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a22545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

问题简介:宪法法院第91/PU-XVIII/2020号裁决指出,制定关于创造就业的2020年第11号法律与1945年《宪法》相矛盾,被视为有条件违宪。因此,在2020年第11号法律颁布的两年内,其衍生规则仍在执行,直到有所改善。然而,两年在法律上是确定的,但在商业和工业界是不确定的。目的/目标研究:本研究旨在了解印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院第91/PU-XVIII/2020号法令的颁布对实施2020年第11号《就业集群法》及其衍生规则的影响,以及在具体时间工作协议的工作关系问题上,为建立和谐的劳资关系所做的其他努力在宪法法院第91/PU-XVIII/2020号裁决之后。设计/方法论/方法论:所使用的研究方法是理论法律研究。调查结果:这项研究的结果表明,宪法法院第91/PU-XVIII/2020号裁决的影响影响了商业和工业界法律保护保障的不确定性。由于在就业集群中实施2020年第11号法律及其衍生规则,即2021年第35号政府条例,需要两年时间,如果没有任何可持续时间的保障,企业和工业界就无法实施这些规定,这将导致劳资关系中的不公正。通过《特定时间工作协议》继续建立和谐的劳资关系的一种选择是回归当地智慧,优先考虑协商一致原则,该原则优先考虑双方在工作关系中的协议,包括在雇佣关系终止时履行赔偿金的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Industrial Relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in The Perspective of Legal Justice
Introduction to The Problem: The constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 stated that the establishment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation contradicts the 1945 Constitution and is considered conditional unconstitutional. Thus, within two years of Law No. 11 of 2020, its derivative rules are still enforced until there is an improvement. However, two years is a legal certainty, but it is uncertain in the business and industrial worlds. Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to find out how the effect of the issuance of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the implementation of Law No. 11 of 2020 on the Employment Cluster and its derivative rules and how alternative efforts in creating harmonious industrial relations on the issue of working relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is doctrinal legal research. Findings: This research resulted in a study that the influence of constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 impacts the uncertainty of legal protection guarantees in the business and the industrial world. Because it takes two years to implement the provisions of Law No. 11 of 2020 in the Employment cluster and its derivative rules, namely Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, the business and the industrial world cannot implement the provisions without any guarantee of sustainable time, and it will lead to injustice in industrial relations. One alternative to continue creating harmonious industrial relations with Specific Time Work Agreements is to return to local wisdom, prioritizing the principle of consensus deliberation that prioritizes the parties' agreement in working relations including the fulfillment of rights in compensation payments when there is a termination of employment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implications of Utilizing Protected Forest Areas for Geothermal Business: A Legal Analysis Local Examination in Child Custody Disputes: Judges’ Efforts to Find the Best Interests of the Child Understanding the Place of Islamic Arbitration within the Nigerian Law Legal Protection of HARA Platform Users on the Service of Electronic Data Interchange Legal Protection Policy for Obstetricians-Gynecologists in Cases of Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1