{"title":"绿色质量——社会空间城市景观类型学的确定","authors":"S. Golubić, Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci","doi":"10.31522/P.26.2(56).4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the history of limitations in use and accessibility of city landscapes. Case study analysis covers six examples of parks and\nresidential square gardens. Mutual comparison offers a new socio-spatial urban landscape typology, which precedes the selection of models of rehabilitation for city landscapes. The results show that designed landscapes are used not only to mitigate, but also to intensify\nsocio-spatial inequality.","PeriodicalId":42738,"journal":{"name":"Prostor","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greenequality - Determination of Socio-Spatial Urban Landscape Typology\",\"authors\":\"S. Golubić, Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci\",\"doi\":\"10.31522/P.26.2(56).4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the history of limitations in use and accessibility of city landscapes. Case study analysis covers six examples of parks and\\nresidential square gardens. Mutual comparison offers a new socio-spatial urban landscape typology, which precedes the selection of models of rehabilitation for city landscapes. The results show that designed landscapes are used not only to mitigate, but also to intensify\\nsocio-spatial inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostor\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31522/P.26.2(56).4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Greenequality - Determination of Socio-Spatial Urban Landscape Typology
This paper explores the history of limitations in use and accessibility of city landscapes. Case study analysis covers six examples of parks and
residential square gardens. Mutual comparison offers a new socio-spatial urban landscape typology, which precedes the selection of models of rehabilitation for city landscapes. The results show that designed landscapes are used not only to mitigate, but also to intensify
socio-spatial inequality.
期刊介绍：
The journal PROSTOR publishes scientific papers from all branches of architecture and urban planning as well as texts from other fields of science (art history, archaeology, ethnology, sociology, geography, civil engineering, geodesy, forestry, design...) if their content relates to architectural issues.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
