改善卢旺达布塔雷大学教学医院围手术期急性疼痛护理的合作

Q4 Medicine Rwanda Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.4314/rmj.v79i3.6
J. Baumbour, G. Nyirigira, R. Wilson, W. Nsabiyumva, J. Parlow, A. Johnson, R. Egan
{"title":"改善卢旺达布塔雷大学教学医院围手术期急性疼痛护理的合作","authors":"J. Baumbour, G. Nyirigira, R. Wilson, W. Nsabiyumva, J. Parlow, A. Johnson, R. Egan","doi":"10.4314/rmj.v79i3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nBACKGROUND: A perioperative acute pain care program integrating standardized assessment and treatment forms into pain care was developed and implemented at an urban hospital in Rwanda through a collaboration between Rwandan and Canadian experts. This study evaluated the perioperative acute pain care program using a quality improvement lens. \nMETHODS: Using the Model for Improvement: Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle, a mixed methods evaluation was performed. Over one year, 519 randomized patient chart audits were conducted and analyzed through control charts. Through purposeful sampling, focus groups comprised ofsurgeons and nurses (N=34) involved in pain care in surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesiology were performed and analyzed via thematic coding. \nRESULTS: The average attempted form completion rate across all forms varied monthly between 56-93% (mean=79%; median=81%). Across all forms, both the mean and median total number of errors per form were 12.5. Enablers of form use included improved pain care for patients and feelings of professional satisfaction. Program implementation was challenged by resource constraints, form integration, and health care provider training. \nCONCLUSION: Future quality improvement collaborations should identify and address improved pain care while working with local experts to ensure PDSA cycles are continuous, and evidence based. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":38181,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A collaboration to improve perioperative acute pain care at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare, Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"J. Baumbour, G. Nyirigira, R. Wilson, W. Nsabiyumva, J. Parlow, A. Johnson, R. Egan\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/rmj.v79i3.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nBACKGROUND: A perioperative acute pain care program integrating standardized assessment and treatment forms into pain care was developed and implemented at an urban hospital in Rwanda through a collaboration between Rwandan and Canadian experts. This study evaluated the perioperative acute pain care program using a quality improvement lens. \\nMETHODS: Using the Model for Improvement: Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle, a mixed methods evaluation was performed. Over one year, 519 randomized patient chart audits were conducted and analyzed through control charts. Through purposeful sampling, focus groups comprised ofsurgeons and nurses (N=34) involved in pain care in surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesiology were performed and analyzed via thematic coding. \\nRESULTS: The average attempted form completion rate across all forms varied monthly between 56-93% (mean=79%; median=81%). Across all forms, both the mean and median total number of errors per form were 12.5. Enablers of form use included improved pain care for patients and feelings of professional satisfaction. Program implementation was challenged by resource constraints, form integration, and health care provider training. \\nCONCLUSION: Future quality improvement collaborations should identify and address improved pain care while working with local experts to ensure PDSA cycles are continuous, and evidence based. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":38181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rwanda Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rwanda Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/rmj.v79i3.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rmj.v79i3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过卢旺达和加拿大专家的合作,在卢旺达的一家城市医院制定并实施了一项将标准化评估和治疗形式纳入疼痛护理的围手术期急性疼痛护理计划。本研究使用质量改善镜评估了围手术期急性疼痛护理计划。方法:采用改进模型:计划、行动、研究、行动(PDSA)循环,进行混合方法评估。在一年多的时间里,共进行了519次随机病历表审计,并通过对照表进行了分析。通过有目的的抽样,对由参与外科、产科和麻醉学疼痛护理的外科医生和护士(N=34)组成的焦点小组进行了调查,并通过主题编码进行了分析。结果:所有表格的平均表格完成率每月在56-93%之间变化(平均值=79%;中位数=81%)。在所有表格中,每个表格的平均和中值错误总数均为12.5。形式使用的推动者包括改善患者的疼痛护理和职业满意度。项目实施受到资源限制、形式整合和医疗保健提供者培训的挑战。结论:未来的质量改进合作应确定并解决疼痛护理的改进问题,同时与当地专家合作,以确保PDSA周期是连续的,并以证据为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A collaboration to improve perioperative acute pain care at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare, Rwanda
BACKGROUND: A perioperative acute pain care program integrating standardized assessment and treatment forms into pain care was developed and implemented at an urban hospital in Rwanda through a collaboration between Rwandan and Canadian experts. This study evaluated the perioperative acute pain care program using a quality improvement lens. METHODS: Using the Model for Improvement: Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle, a mixed methods evaluation was performed. Over one year, 519 randomized patient chart audits were conducted and analyzed through control charts. Through purposeful sampling, focus groups comprised ofsurgeons and nurses (N=34) involved in pain care in surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesiology were performed and analyzed via thematic coding. RESULTS: The average attempted form completion rate across all forms varied monthly between 56-93% (mean=79%; median=81%). Across all forms, both the mean and median total number of errors per form were 12.5. Enablers of form use included improved pain care for patients and feelings of professional satisfaction. Program implementation was challenged by resource constraints, form integration, and health care provider training. CONCLUSION: Future quality improvement collaborations should identify and address improved pain care while working with local experts to ensure PDSA cycles are continuous, and evidence based.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rwanda Medical Journal
Rwanda Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Rwanda Medical Journal (RMJ), is a Not-For-Profit scientific, medical, journal that is published entirely online in open-access electronic format. The RMJ is an interdisciplinary research journal for publication of original work in all the major health disciplines. Through a rigorous process of evaluation and peer review, The RMJ strives to publish original works of high quality for a diverse audience of healthcare professionals. The Journal seeks to deepen knowledge and advance scientific discovery to improve the quality of care of patients in Rwanda and internationally.
期刊最新文献
Starting Early Palliative Care for Suspected Lung Cancer Patient: a Case Series from Resource-limited Setting in Indonesia Factors influencing the choice of place of delivery among mothers of children less than two years in Oghara Delta State, Nigeria Prevalence and forms of violence against healthcare workers in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Nigeria Impact of educational interventions on knowledge, attitude, practice toward pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting among healthcare professionals at the University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda Enhancing sexual and reproductive health services uptake in Sub- Saharan Africa: the role of community Pharmacists in promoting self-care interventions: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1