关爱困境之水:21世纪富有创造性和批判性的牧师神学想象

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Journal of Pastoral Theology Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837
K. Samuel Lee, Danjuma Gibson
{"title":"关爱困境之水:21世纪富有创造性和批判性的牧师神学想象","authors":"K. Samuel Lee, Danjuma Gibson","doi":"10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first issue in volume 31 of the Journal of Pastoral Theology occurs in the wake of one of the most unspeakable acts in the history of the democratic experiment: the insurrectionist terrorist attack on the US nation’s capital as 2020 electoral college votes were being certified, and where five people were killed and dozens more injured. If there was any illusion about safety, security, or normalcy after the contentious presidential election season of 2020, it was shattered at the top of the new year. There is no section of the United States, no institution or organization, or any intellectual or ideological discourse that has been left untouched by the violence and fear precipitated in Washington D.C. All are now forced to wrestle with difficult and painful meaning-making. Social and political divisions are deep as ever. The quest for unity is fragile – and without truth telling, justice, and healing – perhaps even premature. Moreover, these events have forced upon us several questions with which we must contend: (1) Given the risk for human extinction based on the species’ propensity for individualism, self-centeredness, envy, and violence, does self-descriptive terminology like democracy or the greatest nation on earth undermine our capacity for truth-telling, moral agency, and salvation from ourselves? Or, do terms like empire or the Anthropocene Era better capture the essence of the current human and social condition and increase our odds for healing and redemption? (2) Scientific inquiry, objective facts, and truth-telling have been under assault by the power-structure unlike any other time in recent memory. These aggressions against truth have seemingly been perpetuated without guilt or shame. But does the recent assault against truth compel us to revisit our understanding of shame? Could the affective state of shame be useful to pastoral care and its capacity for metanoia and moral revitalization? (3) In the current state of affairs, the demand for pastoral caregiving is probably at an all-time high, and with it, record levels of caregiver burnout and compassion fatigue. But is this burnout solely the result of a high volume of requests for care, or does it reflect a deeper misunderstanding of the spiritual nature of self-care and a debilitating narcissism related to a god-complex? (4) Lastly, in light of the deep divisions in the country, many of which are fueled by religious and spiritual ideology, are we not all compelled to examine our individual and group thought processes for elements of dogma, fundamentalism, or tribalism? That is to say, how might healthy and transformative practices of doubt and ambiguity contribute to life-giving pastoral care? As we begin 2021, the role and value of pastoral theology cannot be overstated. The genius of pastoral theology is evidenced in how pastoral theologians characterize the expansive scope of pastoral theological concerns and methodologies. The articles in this issue not only address these questions, among others, but illustrate both the wide range of pastoral theological concerns and the methodological diversity employed by pastoral theologians. Dr. Samushonga addresses the topic of pastoral burnout, a timely topic in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic. He criticizes the fact that pastoral theologians usually approach the topic of clergy burnout through the lens of psychology without adequate attention to","PeriodicalId":29885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pastoral Theology","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caring Over Troubled Waters: Creative and Critical Pastoral Theological Imaginations in the 21st Century\",\"authors\":\"K. Samuel Lee, Danjuma Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first issue in volume 31 of the Journal of Pastoral Theology occurs in the wake of one of the most unspeakable acts in the history of the democratic experiment: the insurrectionist terrorist attack on the US nation’s capital as 2020 electoral college votes were being certified, and where five people were killed and dozens more injured. If there was any illusion about safety, security, or normalcy after the contentious presidential election season of 2020, it was shattered at the top of the new year. There is no section of the United States, no institution or organization, or any intellectual or ideological discourse that has been left untouched by the violence and fear precipitated in Washington D.C. All are now forced to wrestle with difficult and painful meaning-making. Social and political divisions are deep as ever. The quest for unity is fragile – and without truth telling, justice, and healing – perhaps even premature. Moreover, these events have forced upon us several questions with which we must contend: (1) Given the risk for human extinction based on the species’ propensity for individualism, self-centeredness, envy, and violence, does self-descriptive terminology like democracy or the greatest nation on earth undermine our capacity for truth-telling, moral agency, and salvation from ourselves? Or, do terms like empire or the Anthropocene Era better capture the essence of the current human and social condition and increase our odds for healing and redemption? (2) Scientific inquiry, objective facts, and truth-telling have been under assault by the power-structure unlike any other time in recent memory. These aggressions against truth have seemingly been perpetuated without guilt or shame. But does the recent assault against truth compel us to revisit our understanding of shame? Could the affective state of shame be useful to pastoral care and its capacity for metanoia and moral revitalization? (3) In the current state of affairs, the demand for pastoral caregiving is probably at an all-time high, and with it, record levels of caregiver burnout and compassion fatigue. But is this burnout solely the result of a high volume of requests for care, or does it reflect a deeper misunderstanding of the spiritual nature of self-care and a debilitating narcissism related to a god-complex? (4) Lastly, in light of the deep divisions in the country, many of which are fueled by religious and spiritual ideology, are we not all compelled to examine our individual and group thought processes for elements of dogma, fundamentalism, or tribalism? That is to say, how might healthy and transformative practices of doubt and ambiguity contribute to life-giving pastoral care? As we begin 2021, the role and value of pastoral theology cannot be overstated. The genius of pastoral theology is evidenced in how pastoral theologians characterize the expansive scope of pastoral theological concerns and methodologies. The articles in this issue not only address these questions, among others, but illustrate both the wide range of pastoral theological concerns and the methodological diversity employed by pastoral theologians. Dr. Samushonga addresses the topic of pastoral burnout, a timely topic in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic. He criticizes the fact that pastoral theologians usually approach the topic of clergy burnout through the lens of psychology without adequate attention to\",\"PeriodicalId\":29885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pastoral Theology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pastoral Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pastoral Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2021.1887837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

《牧师神学杂志》第31卷的第一期发生在民主实验史上最难以形容的行为之一之后:在2020年选举人团选票被认证之际,美国首都发生了叛乱恐怖袭击,造成5人死亡,数十人受伤。如果说在2020年充满争议的总统选举季之后,人们对安全、安保或正常状态有任何幻想,那么在新年伊始,这种幻想就破灭了。美国没有一个部门,没有一个机构或组织,也没有任何知识分子或意识形态话语没有受到华盛顿特区引发的暴力和恐惧的影响。现在,所有人都被迫与艰难而痛苦的意义作斗争。社会和政治分歧一如既往地深刻。对团结的追求是脆弱的——没有真相、正义和治愈——甚至可能为时过早。此外,这些事件迫使我们不得不面对几个问题:(1)鉴于人类灭绝的风险是基于物种的个人主义、以自我为中心、嫉妒和暴力倾向,民主或地球上最伟大的国家等自我描述的术语是否会削弱我们讲真话、道德代理和自我救赎的能力?或者,像帝国或人类世时代这样的术语能更好地抓住当前人类和社会状况的本质,并增加我们治愈和救赎的几率吗?(2) 科学探究、客观事实和讲真话受到了权力结构的攻击,这与最近记忆中的任何时候都不同。这些对真相的攻击似乎一直持续下去,没有罪恶感或羞耻感。但是,最近对真相的攻击是否迫使我们重新审视对羞耻的理解?羞耻的情感状态是否有助于田园关怀及其对元认知和道德复兴的能力?(3) 在目前的情况下,对田园护理的需求可能处于历史最高水平,随之而来的是护理人员的倦怠和同情疲劳。但是,这种倦怠仅仅是大量护理请求的结果,还是反映了对自我护理精神本质的更深误解,以及与上帝情结有关的令人衰弱的自恋?(4) 最后,鉴于这个国家的深刻分歧,其中许多分歧是由宗教和精神意识形态推动的,我们不是都被迫审视我们的个人和群体思维过程,寻找教条、原教旨主义或部落主义的元素吗?也就是说,怀疑和模糊的健康和变革性实践如何有助于提供生活的田园关怀?2021年伊始,田园神学的作用和价值怎么强调都不为过。田园神学的天才体现在田园神学家如何描述田园神学关注和方法论的广泛范围。本期的文章不仅解决了这些问题,还说明了牧神学家广泛关注的牧神神学问题和方法的多样性。Samushonga博士谈到了田园倦怠的话题,这是新冠肺炎大流行时代的一个及时话题。他批评了这样一个事实,即田园神学家通常通过心理学的视角来处理神职人员倦怠的话题,而没有充分关注
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caring Over Troubled Waters: Creative and Critical Pastoral Theological Imaginations in the 21st Century
The first issue in volume 31 of the Journal of Pastoral Theology occurs in the wake of one of the most unspeakable acts in the history of the democratic experiment: the insurrectionist terrorist attack on the US nation’s capital as 2020 electoral college votes were being certified, and where five people were killed and dozens more injured. If there was any illusion about safety, security, or normalcy after the contentious presidential election season of 2020, it was shattered at the top of the new year. There is no section of the United States, no institution or organization, or any intellectual or ideological discourse that has been left untouched by the violence and fear precipitated in Washington D.C. All are now forced to wrestle with difficult and painful meaning-making. Social and political divisions are deep as ever. The quest for unity is fragile – and without truth telling, justice, and healing – perhaps even premature. Moreover, these events have forced upon us several questions with which we must contend: (1) Given the risk for human extinction based on the species’ propensity for individualism, self-centeredness, envy, and violence, does self-descriptive terminology like democracy or the greatest nation on earth undermine our capacity for truth-telling, moral agency, and salvation from ourselves? Or, do terms like empire or the Anthropocene Era better capture the essence of the current human and social condition and increase our odds for healing and redemption? (2) Scientific inquiry, objective facts, and truth-telling have been under assault by the power-structure unlike any other time in recent memory. These aggressions against truth have seemingly been perpetuated without guilt or shame. But does the recent assault against truth compel us to revisit our understanding of shame? Could the affective state of shame be useful to pastoral care and its capacity for metanoia and moral revitalization? (3) In the current state of affairs, the demand for pastoral caregiving is probably at an all-time high, and with it, record levels of caregiver burnout and compassion fatigue. But is this burnout solely the result of a high volume of requests for care, or does it reflect a deeper misunderstanding of the spiritual nature of self-care and a debilitating narcissism related to a god-complex? (4) Lastly, in light of the deep divisions in the country, many of which are fueled by religious and spiritual ideology, are we not all compelled to examine our individual and group thought processes for elements of dogma, fundamentalism, or tribalism? That is to say, how might healthy and transformative practices of doubt and ambiguity contribute to life-giving pastoral care? As we begin 2021, the role and value of pastoral theology cannot be overstated. The genius of pastoral theology is evidenced in how pastoral theologians characterize the expansive scope of pastoral theological concerns and methodologies. The articles in this issue not only address these questions, among others, but illustrate both the wide range of pastoral theological concerns and the methodological diversity employed by pastoral theologians. Dr. Samushonga addresses the topic of pastoral burnout, a timely topic in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic. He criticizes the fact that pastoral theologians usually approach the topic of clergy burnout through the lens of psychology without adequate attention to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Spanish-Speaking Afro-Caribbean Greater Antillean Multiple Spiritual/Religious Belonging and Post/Decolonial Spiritual Care Proposal: A Case Study Midwifing Social Movements: How Movement Chaplains Practice Pastoral Theology Through Accessible, Critical, and Collective Spiritual Care Shelter Theology: The Religious Lives of People Without Homes Out Standing in the Field: Qualitative Research in Pastoral Theology and Care [Potential for infusion correction of COVID-19-associated endotheliopathy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1