教师对OER津贴计划的看法

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE New Review of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI:10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452
Christopher V. Hollister, Joseph D. Patton
{"title":"教师对OER津贴计划的看法","authors":"Christopher V. Hollister, Joseph D. Patton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study recounts the experimental implementation of a stipend program to incentivize and reward instructor use of open educational resources (OERs). The authors leveraged a statewide initiative to develop an award system based on specific criteria, and 24 instructors qualified. The authors surveyed awardees to explore their perceptions of using OERs and the utility of incentivizing that practice. All survey participants reported that the use of OERs had a highly or moderately positive impact on student learning and engagement. The majority of participants indicated curricular needs and textbook costs as the primary motivations for originally creating or adopting OERs; only one-third qualified the stipend program as either highly or moderately incentivizing. Participants also reported how they used their stipends, the challenges to OER adoption, and their recommendations for how to incentivize the practice. The authors discuss the implications for OER stipend programs generally, and they propose future research directions.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"435 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty Perceptions of an OER Stipend Program\",\"authors\":\"Christopher V. Hollister, Joseph D. Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study recounts the experimental implementation of a stipend program to incentivize and reward instructor use of open educational resources (OERs). The authors leveraged a statewide initiative to develop an award system based on specific criteria, and 24 instructors qualified. The authors surveyed awardees to explore their perceptions of using OERs and the utility of incentivizing that practice. All survey participants reported that the use of OERs had a highly or moderately positive impact on student learning and engagement. The majority of participants indicated curricular needs and textbook costs as the primary motivations for originally creating or adopting OERs; only one-third qualified the stipend program as either highly or moderately incentivizing. Participants also reported how they used their stipends, the challenges to OER adoption, and their recommendations for how to incentivize the practice. The authors discuss the implications for OER stipend programs generally, and they propose future research directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"435 - 453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究叙述了一项津贴计划的实验实施,以激励和奖励教师使用开放教育资源。作者利用一项全州范围的倡议,开发了一个基于特定标准的奖励系统,24名教师获得了资格。作者调查了获奖者,探讨他们对使用OERs的看法以及激励这种做法的效用。所有调查参与者都报告说,使用OERs对学生的学习和参与有高度或中度的积极影响。大多数参与者表示最初创建或采用开放式教育课程的主要动机是课程需求和教科书成本;只有三分之一的人认为津贴计划具有高度或适度的激励作用。参与者还报告了他们如何使用他们的津贴,OER采用的挑战,以及他们对如何激励实践的建议。作者从总体上讨论了OER津贴计划的影响,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Faculty Perceptions of an OER Stipend Program
Abstract This study recounts the experimental implementation of a stipend program to incentivize and reward instructor use of open educational resources (OERs). The authors leveraged a statewide initiative to develop an award system based on specific criteria, and 24 instructors qualified. The authors surveyed awardees to explore their perceptions of using OERs and the utility of incentivizing that practice. All survey participants reported that the use of OERs had a highly or moderately positive impact on student learning and engagement. The majority of participants indicated curricular needs and textbook costs as the primary motivations for originally creating or adopting OERs; only one-third qualified the stipend program as either highly or moderately incentivizing. Participants also reported how they used their stipends, the challenges to OER adoption, and their recommendations for how to incentivize the practice. The authors discuss the implications for OER stipend programs generally, and they propose future research directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Workplace Empowerment and Librarianship: A Perception of Female Employees in Pakistan “Decolonising and diversifying the Library through student partnerships” Decolonising DMU: Reflections on changes, challenges and impact with an eye towards the future Diversifying, Decentring and Decolonising academic libraries: A literature review Use of e-library services by postgraduate students at Mzuzu University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1