{"title":"首先,他们是为了批判种族理论而来的……","authors":"J. Zelnick, Mimi E. Kim, Sara Goodkind","doi":"10.1177/08861099231163651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 2022 came to a close with the sudden and swift removal of Professor Alan Dettlaff, a respected child welfare scholar and leader in the growing abolitionist movement, from his position as Dean of the University of Houston Graduate School of Social Work (Flaherty, 2023). While this was one of the more prominent dismissals in academic social work, it put in stark human terms the impact of a renewed and effective onslaught of political repression in education. An academic social work community quickly gathered over the holidays to support Dr. Dettlaff and forge a public response and call to action. Dr. Terri Friedline and Dean Beth Angell of the University of Michigan’s School of Social Work (2023) hosted a national forum in early January 2023 called Social Work and Abolition in the New Year to add transparency to the University of Houston’s dismissal of Dr. Dettlaff from his leadership position. The panelists, including two members of Affilia’s editorial leadership team, stood in support of Dr. Dettlaff, denouncing alarming efforts to silence and root out critical frameworks and those who speak out against racism and other systems of oppression. Dr. Dettlaff’s censure demonstrates that while lukewarm anti-racism might be tolerated or applauded, bold challenges to the institutions that uphold racism including policing, prisons, and the child welfare system—increasingly identified as the pillars of carceral social work—are not. Alan Dettlaff’s removal, of course, is just one result of the ongoing evisceration of racial and gender justice advances that have been made since the civil right era. In the summer of 2020, the global protests against police murders of Black and Brown people raised widespread public demands to “defund the police” that, for some, extended to calls to abolish policing, prisons, and the punishing systems represented, in part, by social work. The backlash has been swift. Today, the daily postings of new state legislation and school board policies quashing even the mention of race or gender beyond the binary—followed by silencing, admonishments, dismissals, and even threats to life—have become shockingly commonplace. We are aware that many of us as writers and readers of Affilia have been directly impacted by these frightening trends. We write this editorial as a tribute to Alan Dettlaff and the many of us who continue to champion critical thinking, scholarship, teaching, policies, and practice—even in the face of such threats—and to those of us who may do so with increasing wariness and even retreat. This piece further serves as an acknowledgment of the soberness of these times and as a call for solidarity. As we use these pages to document the terror of this moment of backlash and attack, we echo the recent Social Welfare History Group bibliography, “Red Scares, Political Repression, and Social Work: Why Now?” (Abramovitz et al., 2023) by asking if these current trends constitute a modern-day red scare. This timely bibliography traces the evolution of red scares in the United States from the first red scare during the period following the 1917 Russian Revolution and the Great Depression (notably the period that saw the birth of the U.S. social welfare system, such as it is), to the second red scare during the period of McCarthyism (notably the period of civil rights organizing and early stirrings of second-wave feminism). The bibliography goes on to document how “panics over progressive political ideas and critiques of the status quo continue to generate backlash and repression in the United States,” to ask if the “past is prologue,” and to encourage us to see today’s events as a continuation of the same forces that fueled the red scares of the past (p. 2). We turn to the outspoken and Editorial","PeriodicalId":47277,"journal":{"name":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","volume":"38 1","pages":"169 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First They Came for Critical Race Theory …\",\"authors\":\"J. Zelnick, Mimi E. Kim, Sara Goodkind\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08861099231163651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 2022 came to a close with the sudden and swift removal of Professor Alan Dettlaff, a respected child welfare scholar and leader in the growing abolitionist movement, from his position as Dean of the University of Houston Graduate School of Social Work (Flaherty, 2023). While this was one of the more prominent dismissals in academic social work, it put in stark human terms the impact of a renewed and effective onslaught of political repression in education. An academic social work community quickly gathered over the holidays to support Dr. Dettlaff and forge a public response and call to action. Dr. Terri Friedline and Dean Beth Angell of the University of Michigan’s School of Social Work (2023) hosted a national forum in early January 2023 called Social Work and Abolition in the New Year to add transparency to the University of Houston’s dismissal of Dr. Dettlaff from his leadership position. The panelists, including two members of Affilia’s editorial leadership team, stood in support of Dr. Dettlaff, denouncing alarming efforts to silence and root out critical frameworks and those who speak out against racism and other systems of oppression. Dr. Dettlaff’s censure demonstrates that while lukewarm anti-racism might be tolerated or applauded, bold challenges to the institutions that uphold racism including policing, prisons, and the child welfare system—increasingly identified as the pillars of carceral social work—are not. Alan Dettlaff’s removal, of course, is just one result of the ongoing evisceration of racial and gender justice advances that have been made since the civil right era. In the summer of 2020, the global protests against police murders of Black and Brown people raised widespread public demands to “defund the police” that, for some, extended to calls to abolish policing, prisons, and the punishing systems represented, in part, by social work. The backlash has been swift. Today, the daily postings of new state legislation and school board policies quashing even the mention of race or gender beyond the binary—followed by silencing, admonishments, dismissals, and even threats to life—have become shockingly commonplace. We are aware that many of us as writers and readers of Affilia have been directly impacted by these frightening trends. We write this editorial as a tribute to Alan Dettlaff and the many of us who continue to champion critical thinking, scholarship, teaching, policies, and practice—even in the face of such threats—and to those of us who may do so with increasing wariness and even retreat. This piece further serves as an acknowledgment of the soberness of these times and as a call for solidarity. As we use these pages to document the terror of this moment of backlash and attack, we echo the recent Social Welfare History Group bibliography, “Red Scares, Political Repression, and Social Work: Why Now?” (Abramovitz et al., 2023) by asking if these current trends constitute a modern-day red scare. This timely bibliography traces the evolution of red scares in the United States from the first red scare during the period following the 1917 Russian Revolution and the Great Depression (notably the period that saw the birth of the U.S. social welfare system, such as it is), to the second red scare during the period of McCarthyism (notably the period of civil rights organizing and early stirrings of second-wave feminism). The bibliography goes on to document how “panics over progressive political ideas and critiques of the status quo continue to generate backlash and repression in the United States,” to ask if the “past is prologue,” and to encourage us to see today’s events as a continuation of the same forces that fueled the red scares of the past (p. 2). We turn to the outspoken and Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":47277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"169 - 174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231163651\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231163651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
2022年,休斯顿大学社会工作研究生院院长Alan Dettlaff教授突然迅速被免职,他是一位受人尊敬的儿童福利学者,也是日益壮大的废奴主义运动的领导者(Flaherty,2023)。虽然这是学术社会工作中最突出的解雇之一,但它以鲜明的人性化的语言表达了教育中新一轮有效的政治镇压的影响。节日期间,一个学术社会工作团体迅速聚集在一起,支持Dettlaff博士,并形成公众反应和行动呼吁。密歇根大学社会工作学院(2023年)的Terri Friedline博士和院长Beth Angell于2023年1月初主持了一个名为“新年社会工作与废除”的全国论坛,以增加休斯顿大学解雇Dettlaff博士的透明度。包括Affilia编辑领导团队的两名成员在内的小组成员支持Dettlaff博士,谴责为压制和根除批评框架以及那些公开反对种族主义和其他压迫制度的人所做的令人震惊的努力。Dettlaff博士的谴责表明,尽管温和的反种族主义可能会被容忍或赞扬,但对维护种族主义的机构的大胆挑战,包括警察、监狱和儿童福利系统——越来越被视为尸体社会工作的支柱——却不是。当然,Alan Dettlaff的免职只是自民权时代以来种族和性别正义进步不断被削弱的结果之一。2020年夏天,针对警察谋杀黑人和布朗人的全球抗议活动引发了公众对“削减警察经费”的广泛要求,对一些人来说,这一要求延伸到了废除警察、监狱和部分以社会工作为代表的惩罚制度的呼吁。反对声音很快。如今,每天都会发布新的州立法和学校董事会政策,甚至在二元之外取消对种族或性别的提及,随后是沉默、训诫、解雇,甚至威胁生命,这已经变得司空见惯,令人震惊。我们知道,作为《Affilia》的作者和读者,我们中的许多人都受到了这些可怕趋势的直接影响。我们写这篇社论是为了向Alan Dettlaff和我们中的许多人致敬,他们继续支持批判性思维、学术、教学、政策和实践——即使面对这样的威胁——以及我们中那些可能会越来越谨慎甚至退缩的人致敬。这篇文章进一步承认了这个时代的清醒性,并呼吁团结一致。当我们用这些页面来记录这一反弹和攻击时刻的恐怖时,我们呼应了社会福利历史小组最近的参考书目“红色恐慌、政治镇压和社会工作:为什么是现在?”(Abramovitz et al.,2023),问这些当前的趋势是否构成了现代的红色恐慌。这本及时的参考书目追溯了美国红色恐慌的演变,从1917年俄罗斯革命和大萧条之后的第一次红色恐慌(尤其是美国社会福利制度诞生的时期),麦卡锡主义时期的第二次红色恐慌(尤其是民权组织时期和第二波女权主义的早期煽动)。参考书目继续记录了“对进步政治思想的恐慌和对现状的批评如何继续在美国引发反弹和镇压”,询问“过去是否是序幕”,并鼓励我们将今天的事件视为过去引发红色恐慌的力量的延续(第2页)。我们求助于直言不讳的编辑
The year 2022 came to a close with the sudden and swift removal of Professor Alan Dettlaff, a respected child welfare scholar and leader in the growing abolitionist movement, from his position as Dean of the University of Houston Graduate School of Social Work (Flaherty, 2023). While this was one of the more prominent dismissals in academic social work, it put in stark human terms the impact of a renewed and effective onslaught of political repression in education. An academic social work community quickly gathered over the holidays to support Dr. Dettlaff and forge a public response and call to action. Dr. Terri Friedline and Dean Beth Angell of the University of Michigan’s School of Social Work (2023) hosted a national forum in early January 2023 called Social Work and Abolition in the New Year to add transparency to the University of Houston’s dismissal of Dr. Dettlaff from his leadership position. The panelists, including two members of Affilia’s editorial leadership team, stood in support of Dr. Dettlaff, denouncing alarming efforts to silence and root out critical frameworks and those who speak out against racism and other systems of oppression. Dr. Dettlaff’s censure demonstrates that while lukewarm anti-racism might be tolerated or applauded, bold challenges to the institutions that uphold racism including policing, prisons, and the child welfare system—increasingly identified as the pillars of carceral social work—are not. Alan Dettlaff’s removal, of course, is just one result of the ongoing evisceration of racial and gender justice advances that have been made since the civil right era. In the summer of 2020, the global protests against police murders of Black and Brown people raised widespread public demands to “defund the police” that, for some, extended to calls to abolish policing, prisons, and the punishing systems represented, in part, by social work. The backlash has been swift. Today, the daily postings of new state legislation and school board policies quashing even the mention of race or gender beyond the binary—followed by silencing, admonishments, dismissals, and even threats to life—have become shockingly commonplace. We are aware that many of us as writers and readers of Affilia have been directly impacted by these frightening trends. We write this editorial as a tribute to Alan Dettlaff and the many of us who continue to champion critical thinking, scholarship, teaching, policies, and practice—even in the face of such threats—and to those of us who may do so with increasing wariness and even retreat. This piece further serves as an acknowledgment of the soberness of these times and as a call for solidarity. As we use these pages to document the terror of this moment of backlash and attack, we echo the recent Social Welfare History Group bibliography, “Red Scares, Political Repression, and Social Work: Why Now?” (Abramovitz et al., 2023) by asking if these current trends constitute a modern-day red scare. This timely bibliography traces the evolution of red scares in the United States from the first red scare during the period following the 1917 Russian Revolution and the Great Depression (notably the period that saw the birth of the U.S. social welfare system, such as it is), to the second red scare during the period of McCarthyism (notably the period of civil rights organizing and early stirrings of second-wave feminism). The bibliography goes on to document how “panics over progressive political ideas and critiques of the status quo continue to generate backlash and repression in the United States,” to ask if the “past is prologue,” and to encourage us to see today’s events as a continuation of the same forces that fueled the red scares of the past (p. 2). We turn to the outspoken and Editorial
期刊介绍:
Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work is dedicated to the discussion and development of feminist values, theories, and knowledge as they relate to social work and social welfare research, education, and practice. The intent of Affilia is to bring insight and knowledge to the task of eliminating discrimination and oppression, especially with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, class, age, disability, and sexual and affectional preference.