对智能手机平台上针对焦虑症状的移动心理健康干预的有效性、内容和使用模式的系统回顾

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.24193/jebp.2021.2.11
Numan Turan, Ş. Çetintaş
{"title":"对智能手机平台上针对焦虑症状的移动心理健康干预的有效性、内容和使用模式的系统回顾","authors":"Numan Turan, Ş. Çetintaş","doi":"10.24193/jebp.2021.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This systematic review aims to examine the content, usage pattern and\nefficacy of mobile mental health interventions in reducing anxiety\nsymptoms. A search of 10 electronic databases returned 44 408 studies in\ntotal and 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4460 participants in\ntotal. The rate of attrition was 27% (SD = 22) among the participants who\ninitiated the app use. The rate of significant reductions in measures of anxiety\nsymptoms was 87% from within-subjects pretest to posttest assessments, yet\nthis rate dropped to 46% when compared to a waitlist/control group. A vast\nmajority of the studies used cognitive and/or behavioral interventions (N =\n26, 96%), a few studies included professional support (N = 11, 41%), a\nstructured form of delivering the interventions (N = 8, 30%) or tailored it to\nusers’ needs (N = 6, 22%). Few studies reported the actual time spent on the\napp per week (N = 4, M = 63.76, SD = 62.17). The mobile mental health\ninterventions were effective in reducing anxiety symptoms, yet this\neffectiveness eroded compared to control groups. There is a need to develop\nconsistent ways of reporting the usage patterns and testing evidence-based\ninterventions other than cognitive behavioral treatments.\"","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness, Content, and Usage Patterns of Mobile Mental Health Interventions on Smartphone Platforms for Anxiety Symptoms\",\"authors\":\"Numan Turan, Ş. Çetintaş\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/jebp.2021.2.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This systematic review aims to examine the content, usage pattern and\\nefficacy of mobile mental health interventions in reducing anxiety\\nsymptoms. A search of 10 electronic databases returned 44 408 studies in\\ntotal and 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4460 participants in\\ntotal. The rate of attrition was 27% (SD = 22) among the participants who\\ninitiated the app use. The rate of significant reductions in measures of anxiety\\nsymptoms was 87% from within-subjects pretest to posttest assessments, yet\\nthis rate dropped to 46% when compared to a waitlist/control group. A vast\\nmajority of the studies used cognitive and/or behavioral interventions (N =\\n26, 96%), a few studies included professional support (N = 11, 41%), a\\nstructured form of delivering the interventions (N = 8, 30%) or tailored it to\\nusers’ needs (N = 6, 22%). Few studies reported the actual time spent on the\\napp per week (N = 4, M = 63.76, SD = 62.17). The mobile mental health\\ninterventions were effective in reducing anxiety symptoms, yet this\\neffectiveness eroded compared to control groups. There is a need to develop\\nconsistent ways of reporting the usage patterns and testing evidence-based\\ninterventions other than cognitive behavioral treatments.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":43042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2021.2.11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2021.2.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“这项系统综述旨在检查移动心理健康干预措施在减少焦虑症状方面的内容、使用模式和有效性。搜索10个电子数据库,共返回44008项研究,27项研究符合纳入标准,包括4460名参与者。流失率为27%(SD=22)在发起应用程序使用的参与者中。从受试者的测试前到测试后评估,焦虑症状测量的显著降低率为87%,但与等待名单/对照组相比,这一比率降至46%。绝大多数研究使用了认知和/或行为干预措施(N=2696%),少数研究包括专业支持(N=1141%)、提供干预措施的结构化形式(N=8,30%)或根据用户需求量身定制(N=6,22%)。很少有研究报告每周在应用程序上花费的实际时间(N=4,M=63.76,SD=62.17)。移动心理健康干预措施在减少焦虑症状方面是有效的,但与对照组相比,这种有效性有所下降。需要开发一致的方法来报告使用模式,并测试基于认知行为治疗以外的干预措施的证据。“
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness, Content, and Usage Patterns of Mobile Mental Health Interventions on Smartphone Platforms for Anxiety Symptoms
"This systematic review aims to examine the content, usage pattern and efficacy of mobile mental health interventions in reducing anxiety symptoms. A search of 10 electronic databases returned 44 408 studies in total and 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4460 participants in total. The rate of attrition was 27% (SD = 22) among the participants who initiated the app use. The rate of significant reductions in measures of anxiety symptoms was 87% from within-subjects pretest to posttest assessments, yet this rate dropped to 46% when compared to a waitlist/control group. A vast majority of the studies used cognitive and/or behavioral interventions (N = 26, 96%), a few studies included professional support (N = 11, 41%), a structured form of delivering the interventions (N = 8, 30%) or tailored it to users’ needs (N = 6, 22%). Few studies reported the actual time spent on the app per week (N = 4, M = 63.76, SD = 62.17). The mobile mental health interventions were effective in reducing anxiety symptoms, yet this effectiveness eroded compared to control groups. There is a need to develop consistent ways of reporting the usage patterns and testing evidence-based interventions other than cognitive behavioral treatments."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.
期刊最新文献
Social Anxiety from an Attachment Theory Perspective: The Mediating Role of Early Maladaptive Schema Domains and Rejection Sensitivity Mental health literacy: A Survey of the Public’s Ability to Recognize Mental Disorders and Their Knowledge about the Effectiveness of Helpful Interventions to Help the Victims The Longitudinal Mediating Effect of Distress Tolerance in a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Mindfulness and Self-compassion Decrease Emotional Symptoms, Self-criticism, Rumination and Worry in College Students: A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Group Self-compassion-based Interventions Effect of Training on Beliefs About Exposure Therapy in Experienced Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1