导致劳损的工作姿势的计算机辅助人机工程学分析

Tuna Emir, T. Varol, H. Özel
{"title":"导致劳损的工作姿势的计算机辅助人机工程学分析","authors":"Tuna Emir, T. Varol, H. Özel","doi":"10.33904/ejfe.1188547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ergonomics, which is also known as Human Engineering or Human Factors Engineering, is a discipline allowing a working design in accordance with individuals’ anthropometric (bodily) size, physical strength, and personal characteristics by considering the relationships between individuals and other actors in the system. Specifically, one of the main principles of ergonomics is that individuals should be in harmony with and adaptable to the environment. In working environments where ergonomic principles are not applied, the equipment, machinery, and tools are generally designed without considering the different anthropometric characteristics of people. Hence, employees have to exhibit incorrect working postures in order to adapt to those conditions. It causes a decrease in productivity, loss of labor force, lack of motivation, and musculoskeletal system disorders. It is obvious that such negative outcomes would increase unless the necessary ergonomic arrangements are done. \nCarried out in 7 different workstations of a furniture manufacturing factory, the present study aims to analyze the postures of workers, determine the points they have difficulty and to what extent they have difficulty (the level of risk), and bring the workplace conditions in compliance with the workers’ necessities through improvement arrangements about how they can avoid the ergonomic risks and dangers they face. Within the scope of this study, the data consisting of the photos of workers were used. Contrary to the previous studies incorporating estimation-based risk analyses, the present study employs uMED Ergonomics software in analyzing the angles of body parts and clearly revealing the workers’ postures. Ergonomic risk analysis was performed using the REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method, one of the risk assessment methods. It was determined that the posture modifications and some ergonomic improvements significantly reduced the risk level.","PeriodicalId":36173,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain\",\"authors\":\"Tuna Emir, T. Varol, H. Özel\",\"doi\":\"10.33904/ejfe.1188547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ergonomics, which is also known as Human Engineering or Human Factors Engineering, is a discipline allowing a working design in accordance with individuals’ anthropometric (bodily) size, physical strength, and personal characteristics by considering the relationships between individuals and other actors in the system. Specifically, one of the main principles of ergonomics is that individuals should be in harmony with and adaptable to the environment. In working environments where ergonomic principles are not applied, the equipment, machinery, and tools are generally designed without considering the different anthropometric characteristics of people. Hence, employees have to exhibit incorrect working postures in order to adapt to those conditions. It causes a decrease in productivity, loss of labor force, lack of motivation, and musculoskeletal system disorders. It is obvious that such negative outcomes would increase unless the necessary ergonomic arrangements are done. \\nCarried out in 7 different workstations of a furniture manufacturing factory, the present study aims to analyze the postures of workers, determine the points they have difficulty and to what extent they have difficulty (the level of risk), and bring the workplace conditions in compliance with the workers’ necessities through improvement arrangements about how they can avoid the ergonomic risks and dangers they face. Within the scope of this study, the data consisting of the photos of workers were used. Contrary to the previous studies incorporating estimation-based risk analyses, the present study employs uMED Ergonomics software in analyzing the angles of body parts and clearly revealing the workers’ postures. Ergonomic risk analysis was performed using the REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method, one of the risk assessment methods. It was determined that the posture modifications and some ergonomic improvements significantly reduced the risk level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1188547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1188547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人体工程学,也被称为人体工程学或人因工程学,是一门学科,通过考虑个人与系统中其他参与者之间的关系,允许根据个人的人体测量(身体)尺寸,体力和个人特征进行工作设计。具体来说,人体工程学的主要原则之一是个人应该与环境和谐相处并适应环境。在不适用人体工程学原理的工作环境中,设备、机械和工具的设计通常不考虑人的不同人体特征。因此,员工必须表现出不正确的工作姿势,以适应这些条件。它会导致生产力下降、劳动力流失、缺乏动力和肌肉骨骼系统紊乱。很明显,除非进行必要的人体工程学安排,否则这种负面结果将会增加。本研究在某家具厂的7个不同的工位进行,旨在分析工人的姿势,确定他们的困难点和困难程度(风险水平),并通过改进安排使工作场所条件符合工人的需要,以避免他们所面临的人体工程学风险和危险。在本研究范围内,使用了由工人照片组成的数据。与以往的研究采用基于估计的风险分析不同,本研究采用了uMED人机工程学软件对人体部位的角度进行分析,清晰地揭示了工人的姿势。采用风险评估方法之一REBA(快速全身评估)法进行人体工效学风险分析。研究确定,姿势的改变和一些人体工程学的改进显著降低了风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain
Ergonomics, which is also known as Human Engineering or Human Factors Engineering, is a discipline allowing a working design in accordance with individuals’ anthropometric (bodily) size, physical strength, and personal characteristics by considering the relationships between individuals and other actors in the system. Specifically, one of the main principles of ergonomics is that individuals should be in harmony with and adaptable to the environment. In working environments where ergonomic principles are not applied, the equipment, machinery, and tools are generally designed without considering the different anthropometric characteristics of people. Hence, employees have to exhibit incorrect working postures in order to adapt to those conditions. It causes a decrease in productivity, loss of labor force, lack of motivation, and musculoskeletal system disorders. It is obvious that such negative outcomes would increase unless the necessary ergonomic arrangements are done. Carried out in 7 different workstations of a furniture manufacturing factory, the present study aims to analyze the postures of workers, determine the points they have difficulty and to what extent they have difficulty (the level of risk), and bring the workplace conditions in compliance with the workers’ necessities through improvement arrangements about how they can avoid the ergonomic risks and dangers they face. Within the scope of this study, the data consisting of the photos of workers were used. Contrary to the previous studies incorporating estimation-based risk analyses, the present study employs uMED Ergonomics software in analyzing the angles of body parts and clearly revealing the workers’ postures. Ergonomic risk analysis was performed using the REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method, one of the risk assessment methods. It was determined that the posture modifications and some ergonomic improvements significantly reduced the risk level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Forest Engineering
European Journal of Forest Engineering Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Developing a new harvester head for tree felling Heat-Resilient Workforce: Unveiling the Relationships Between Heat-related Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Precautionary Behavior in Indonesian Pine Forest Workers An Internet of Things Platform for Forest Protection Potential of Geospatial technologies in Mechanized Timber harvesting planning Productivity Analysis of Mid-Size Cable Yarding Operation based on UAV-captured Video Sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1