在可变因素中保持不变:房地产背景下公平会计的挑战

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttab060
Benny Chung, Thomas Yeon
{"title":"在可变因素中保持不变:房地产背景下公平会计的挑战","authors":"Benny Chung, Thomas Yeon","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing and Ors is a recent Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment which concerns a family feud over the ownership of properties. In this article, we will focus on the part of the judgment which concerns the issue of equitable accounting. Although this judgment did not break new legal grounds, we believe that it has several important implications which warrant attention. We will first unpack and explain the judgment and supplement the discussions with the relevant legal principles and concepts. We will then discuss the judgment’s implications to cases involving equitable accounting and where courts are given the option to exercise wide, flexible discretionary powers.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining constants amongst variable factors: the challenge of equitable accounting in the property context\",\"authors\":\"Benny Chung, Thomas Yeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttab060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing and Ors is a recent Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment which concerns a family feud over the ownership of properties. In this article, we will focus on the part of the judgment which concerns the issue of equitable accounting. Although this judgment did not break new legal grounds, we believe that it has several important implications which warrant attention. We will first unpack and explain the judgment and supplement the discussions with the relevant legal principles and concepts. We will then discuss the judgment’s implications to cases involving equitable accounting and where courts are given the option to exercise wide, flexible discretionary powers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

香港终审法院最近判决黎梅诉惠成及欧仕一案,涉及一宗家庭纠纷,涉及物业的所有权。在本文中,我们将重点关注判决中涉及公允会计问题的部分。虽然这一判决没有打破新的法律依据,但我们认为它有几个重要的影响值得注意。我们将首先对判决书进行拆解和解释,并用相关的法律原则和概念进行补充讨论。然后,我们将讨论该判决对涉及公平会计的案件的影响,以及法院可以选择行使广泛、灵活的自由裁量权的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maintaining constants amongst variable factors: the challenge of equitable accounting in the property context
Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing and Ors is a recent Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment which concerns a family feud over the ownership of properties. In this article, we will focus on the part of the judgment which concerns the issue of equitable accounting. Although this judgment did not break new legal grounds, we believe that it has several important implications which warrant attention. We will first unpack and explain the judgment and supplement the discussions with the relevant legal principles and concepts. We will then discuss the judgment’s implications to cases involving equitable accounting and where courts are given the option to exercise wide, flexible discretionary powers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1