实施实验室质量管理体系对埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区卫生中心实验室提供质量实验室服务的影响

Daba Mulleta, Fraol Jaleta, Haile Banti, Bayissa Bekele, Wake Abebe, H. Tadesse, Legesse Eshetu, Adinew Zewdu, A. Botore, Lamessa Tadesse, Tessema Debela
{"title":"实施实验室质量管理体系对埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区卫生中心实验室提供质量实验室服务的影响","authors":"Daba Mulleta, Fraol Jaleta, Haile Banti, Bayissa Bekele, Wake Abebe, H. Tadesse, Legesse Eshetu, Adinew Zewdu, A. Botore, Lamessa Tadesse, Tessema Debela","doi":"10.2147/PLMI.S314656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Continual improvement of laboratory quality service is vital to ensure accuracy, reliability, and timeliness of laboratory results. Implementation of the quality management system is an effective way of monitoring and assuring laboratory quality service. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of laboratory quality management system implementation on improving quality laboratory service in the health centers of Oromia region. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 89 health centers from March 27, 2019 to June 30, 2019 in Oromia. Data were collected using a nationally established laboratory quality management system implementation assessment checklist for health center laboratories. It was analyzed by SPSS version 20 and significantly associated variables with improved laboratory quality services were identified. The status of laboratory quality management system implementation in each laboratory was determined by achievement of star levels. Results: Seventy-one (79.8%) of the total health center laboratories achieved star zero, 6 (6.7%) star one and 9 (10.1%) star two. Only 3 (3.4%) of the total participated laboratories achieved star three. Availability of SSOPs (AOR[95% CI]=7.5 ([1.10–51.54])), preventive maintenance (AOR [95% CI]=9.34 ([1.15–80.95])), review of customer satisfaction (AOR[95% CI]= 15 ([2.87– 80.82])), verification of results (AOR[95% CI]= 4.07 ([1.16–14.36])), availability of specimen guideline (AOR[95% CI]= 5.91 ([1.48–23.60])), availability of established quality indicators (AOR[95% CI]=5.51 ([1.15–26.43])) and quality plan (AOR[95% CI]=4.69 ([1.37–16.07])) were significantly associated with improved quality of laboratory service. Conclusion and Recommendation: About 20.2% of the health center laboratories provide improved laboratory service and achieved greater than star zero. Availability of SSOP, proper handling of documents, preventive maintenance, staff regular meetings, review of customer satisfaction, quality plan, verification of results, availability of specimen guideline, and availability of established quality indicators were the predictors of quality of laboratory service. Technical and managerial support by regional laboratories, facility management, and regional health bureau is vital for implementation of LQMS to improve laboratory quality services.","PeriodicalId":88950,"journal":{"name":"Pathology and laboratory medicine international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Laboratory Quality Management System Implementation on Quality Laboratory Service Delivery in Health Center Laboratories of Oromia Region, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Daba Mulleta, Fraol Jaleta, Haile Banti, Bayissa Bekele, Wake Abebe, H. Tadesse, Legesse Eshetu, Adinew Zewdu, A. Botore, Lamessa Tadesse, Tessema Debela\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PLMI.S314656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Continual improvement of laboratory quality service is vital to ensure accuracy, reliability, and timeliness of laboratory results. Implementation of the quality management system is an effective way of monitoring and assuring laboratory quality service. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of laboratory quality management system implementation on improving quality laboratory service in the health centers of Oromia region. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 89 health centers from March 27, 2019 to June 30, 2019 in Oromia. Data were collected using a nationally established laboratory quality management system implementation assessment checklist for health center laboratories. It was analyzed by SPSS version 20 and significantly associated variables with improved laboratory quality services were identified. The status of laboratory quality management system implementation in each laboratory was determined by achievement of star levels. Results: Seventy-one (79.8%) of the total health center laboratories achieved star zero, 6 (6.7%) star one and 9 (10.1%) star two. Only 3 (3.4%) of the total participated laboratories achieved star three. Availability of SSOPs (AOR[95% CI]=7.5 ([1.10–51.54])), preventive maintenance (AOR [95% CI]=9.34 ([1.15–80.95])), review of customer satisfaction (AOR[95% CI]= 15 ([2.87– 80.82])), verification of results (AOR[95% CI]= 4.07 ([1.16–14.36])), availability of specimen guideline (AOR[95% CI]= 5.91 ([1.48–23.60])), availability of established quality indicators (AOR[95% CI]=5.51 ([1.15–26.43])) and quality plan (AOR[95% CI]=4.69 ([1.37–16.07])) were significantly associated with improved quality of laboratory service. Conclusion and Recommendation: About 20.2% of the health center laboratories provide improved laboratory service and achieved greater than star zero. Availability of SSOP, proper handling of documents, preventive maintenance, staff regular meetings, review of customer satisfaction, quality plan, verification of results, availability of specimen guideline, and availability of established quality indicators were the predictors of quality of laboratory service. Technical and managerial support by regional laboratories, facility management, and regional health bureau is vital for implementation of LQMS to improve laboratory quality services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology and laboratory medicine international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology and laboratory medicine international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PLMI.S314656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology and laboratory medicine international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PLMI.S314656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

:持续改进实验室质量服务对于确保实验室结果的准确性、可靠性和及时性至关重要。实施质量管理体系是监督和保证实验室质量服务的有效途径。本研究的目的是评估实验室质量管理系统的实施对提高奥罗米亚地区卫生中心实验室服务质量的影响。方法:2019年3月27日至2019年6月30日,在奥罗米亚州的89个卫生中心进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。使用国家建立的卫生中心实验室质量管理系统实施评估清单收集数据。通过SPSS版本20对其进行分析,并确定了与实验室质量服务改善显著相关的变量。实验室质量管理体系在各实验室的实施情况由星级成绩决定。结果:71个(79.8%)卫生中心实验室达到零星,6个(6.7%)达到一星,9个(10.1%)达到二星。在所有参与实验室中,只有3个(3.4%)获得了星三。SSOP的可用性(AOR[95%CI]=7.5([1.10–51.54])、预防性维护(AOR=95%CI]=9.34([1.15–80.95]))、客户满意度审查(AOR~95%CI]=15([2.87–80.82])),结果验证(AOR:95%CI]=4.07([1.16–14.36]))、样本指南的可用性,既定质量指标(AOR[95%CI]=5.51([1.15–26.43])和质量计划(AOR=95%CI]=4.69([1.37–16.07]))的可用性与实验室服务质量的提高显著相关。结论和建议:约20.2%的卫生中心实验室提供了改进的实验室服务,并达到了零星以上。SSOP的可用性、文件的正确处理、预防性维护、员工定期会议、客户满意度审查、质量计划、结果验证、样本指南的可用性和既定质量指标的可用性是实验室服务质量的预测因素。区域实验室、设施管理部门和区域卫生局的技术和管理支持对于实施LQMS以提高实验室质量服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Laboratory Quality Management System Implementation on Quality Laboratory Service Delivery in Health Center Laboratories of Oromia Region, Ethiopia
: Continual improvement of laboratory quality service is vital to ensure accuracy, reliability, and timeliness of laboratory results. Implementation of the quality management system is an effective way of monitoring and assuring laboratory quality service. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of laboratory quality management system implementation on improving quality laboratory service in the health centers of Oromia region. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 89 health centers from March 27, 2019 to June 30, 2019 in Oromia. Data were collected using a nationally established laboratory quality management system implementation assessment checklist for health center laboratories. It was analyzed by SPSS version 20 and significantly associated variables with improved laboratory quality services were identified. The status of laboratory quality management system implementation in each laboratory was determined by achievement of star levels. Results: Seventy-one (79.8%) of the total health center laboratories achieved star zero, 6 (6.7%) star one and 9 (10.1%) star two. Only 3 (3.4%) of the total participated laboratories achieved star three. Availability of SSOPs (AOR[95% CI]=7.5 ([1.10–51.54])), preventive maintenance (AOR [95% CI]=9.34 ([1.15–80.95])), review of customer satisfaction (AOR[95% CI]= 15 ([2.87– 80.82])), verification of results (AOR[95% CI]= 4.07 ([1.16–14.36])), availability of specimen guideline (AOR[95% CI]= 5.91 ([1.48–23.60])), availability of established quality indicators (AOR[95% CI]=5.51 ([1.15–26.43])) and quality plan (AOR[95% CI]=4.69 ([1.37–16.07])) were significantly associated with improved quality of laboratory service. Conclusion and Recommendation: About 20.2% of the health center laboratories provide improved laboratory service and achieved greater than star zero. Availability of SSOP, proper handling of documents, preventive maintenance, staff regular meetings, review of customer satisfaction, quality plan, verification of results, availability of specimen guideline, and availability of established quality indicators were the predictors of quality of laboratory service. Technical and managerial support by regional laboratories, facility management, and regional health bureau is vital for implementation of LQMS to improve laboratory quality services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Observational Assessment of Pre-Analytical Errors in Request Format and Phlebotomy Practice in Hematology Tests at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia Recent Application of DNA Microarray Techniques to Diagnose Infectious Disease Analytical Performance Evaluation of Hematology Analyzer Using Various TEa Sources and Sigma Metrics Microbial Threshold Guidelines for UTI Diagnosis: A Scoping Systematic Review Qualification: Lactic Acid as a Prognostic Tool in the Patient with Severe Trauma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1