中美贸易冲突及其对世界贸易体系和多边主义未来的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2022039
Frank Altemöller
{"title":"中美贸易冲突及其对世界贸易体系和多边主义未来的影响","authors":"Frank Altemöller","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trade conflict between China and the US has an impact on many levels. The initial discussion was focused on the economic effects both feared and caused by the trade restrictions. This study, however, will go further than an economic-empirical analysis. Rather, it addresses the structural implications of the conflict: as a result of the US blockade of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Appellate Body, the functioning of the world trade system remains in question. Even though a number of Member States currently participate in a substitute interim dispute settlement system outside the WTO, the future of the world trade system is nonetheless closely tied to a functioning dispute settlement process. For that is the only means by which to guarantee that the contracting parties can trust that their mutually agreed rights and obligations will be respected – and that how dispute settlement will ensure trust in the world trade system as a whole.\nBut what are the prospects for dispute settlement in a situation that is characterized not only by stagnation, but above all by open trade disputes, and for which there is no foreseeable resolution? Are we now witnessing not only a crisis of dispute settlement, but more so, an inability for dispute settlement to function in a multilateral arrangement that lacks a perspective? The author considers the US blockade to be a consequence of the increasing intensification of the global competitive situation, within which the liberalization interests of key actors are going through a transformation. The study will demonstrate how this is leading to more differentiated forms of trade policy, economic and geopolitical integration that operate beyond the previous multilateral liberalization concepts. Nevertheless, the world trade system has an undeniably central role to play in addressing urgent issues of our common future. The author discusses the challenges that lie ahead and asks how further developments can be achieved.\nWorld Trade System, Appellate Body, Dispute Settlement, China-US Trade Conflict, Delegation Sovereign Rights, Sovereignty, Decision Making Practice, US Trade Representative, Non-Market Economy, State-Led Economy, Governance, Trade Liberalization, Blockade, Multilateralism, Global Competition","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The China-US Trade Conflict and Its Impact on the World Trade System and the Future of Multilateralism\",\"authors\":\"Frank Altemöller\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2022039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The trade conflict between China and the US has an impact on many levels. The initial discussion was focused on the economic effects both feared and caused by the trade restrictions. This study, however, will go further than an economic-empirical analysis. Rather, it addresses the structural implications of the conflict: as a result of the US blockade of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Appellate Body, the functioning of the world trade system remains in question. Even though a number of Member States currently participate in a substitute interim dispute settlement system outside the WTO, the future of the world trade system is nonetheless closely tied to a functioning dispute settlement process. For that is the only means by which to guarantee that the contracting parties can trust that their mutually agreed rights and obligations will be respected – and that how dispute settlement will ensure trust in the world trade system as a whole.\\nBut what are the prospects for dispute settlement in a situation that is characterized not only by stagnation, but above all by open trade disputes, and for which there is no foreseeable resolution? Are we now witnessing not only a crisis of dispute settlement, but more so, an inability for dispute settlement to function in a multilateral arrangement that lacks a perspective? The author considers the US blockade to be a consequence of the increasing intensification of the global competitive situation, within which the liberalization interests of key actors are going through a transformation. The study will demonstrate how this is leading to more differentiated forms of trade policy, economic and geopolitical integration that operate beyond the previous multilateral liberalization concepts. Nevertheless, the world trade system has an undeniably central role to play in addressing urgent issues of our common future. The author discusses the challenges that lie ahead and asks how further developments can be achieved.\\nWorld Trade System, Appellate Body, Dispute Settlement, China-US Trade Conflict, Delegation Sovereign Rights, Sovereignty, Decision Making Practice, US Trade Representative, Non-Market Economy, State-Led Economy, Governance, Trade Liberalization, Blockade, Multilateralism, Global Competition\",\"PeriodicalId\":12728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中美贸易冲突的影响是多方面的。最初的讨论集中在贸易限制所带来的经济影响上。然而,这项研究将比经济实证分析走得更远。相反,它解决了这场冲突的结构性影响:由于美国封锁了世界贸易组织(WTO)上诉机构,世界贸易体系的运作仍然存在问题。尽管一些会员国目前参加了世贸组织以外的替代性临时争端解决制度,但世界贸易制度的未来仍然与有效的争端解决程序密切相关。因为这是保证缔约各方能够相信它们相互商定的权利和义务将得到尊重的唯一手段- -也是保证解决争端将如何确保对整个世界贸易体系的信任的唯一手段。但是,在一个不仅以停滞为特征,而且首先以公开的贸易争端为特征,而且没有可预见的解决办法的情况下,解决争端的前景如何?我们现在是否不仅目睹了一场解决争端的危机,而且更重要的是,目睹了解决争端无法在缺乏前景的多边安排中发挥作用?作者认为,美国的封锁是全球竞争形势日益加剧的结果,在这种形势下,关键参与者的自由化利益正在经历转变。这项研究将表明,这将如何导致贸易政策、经济和地缘政治一体化的更有区别的形式,这些形式超越了以前的多边自由化概念。然而,世界贸易体系在处理我们共同未来的紧迫问题方面发挥着不可否认的中心作用。作者讨论了未来面临的挑战,并提出了如何实现进一步发展的问题。世界贸易体制、上诉机构、争端解决、中美贸易冲突、委托主权、主权、决策实践、美国贸易代表、非市场经济、国家主导经济、治理、贸易自由化、封锁、多边主义、全球竞争
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The China-US Trade Conflict and Its Impact on the World Trade System and the Future of Multilateralism
The trade conflict between China and the US has an impact on many levels. The initial discussion was focused on the economic effects both feared and caused by the trade restrictions. This study, however, will go further than an economic-empirical analysis. Rather, it addresses the structural implications of the conflict: as a result of the US blockade of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Appellate Body, the functioning of the world trade system remains in question. Even though a number of Member States currently participate in a substitute interim dispute settlement system outside the WTO, the future of the world trade system is nonetheless closely tied to a functioning dispute settlement process. For that is the only means by which to guarantee that the contracting parties can trust that their mutually agreed rights and obligations will be respected – and that how dispute settlement will ensure trust in the world trade system as a whole. But what are the prospects for dispute settlement in a situation that is characterized not only by stagnation, but above all by open trade disputes, and for which there is no foreseeable resolution? Are we now witnessing not only a crisis of dispute settlement, but more so, an inability for dispute settlement to function in a multilateral arrangement that lacks a perspective? The author considers the US blockade to be a consequence of the increasing intensification of the global competitive situation, within which the liberalization interests of key actors are going through a transformation. The study will demonstrate how this is leading to more differentiated forms of trade policy, economic and geopolitical integration that operate beyond the previous multilateral liberalization concepts. Nevertheless, the world trade system has an undeniably central role to play in addressing urgent issues of our common future. The author discusses the challenges that lie ahead and asks how further developments can be achieved. World Trade System, Appellate Body, Dispute Settlement, China-US Trade Conflict, Delegation Sovereign Rights, Sovereignty, Decision Making Practice, US Trade Representative, Non-Market Economy, State-Led Economy, Governance, Trade Liberalization, Blockade, Multilateralism, Global Competition
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Analysis Of The Foreign Subsidies Regulation From An International Trade Law Perspective On Trade In Goods Robotics Process Automation (RPA) And The Import/Export Customs Declaration Process Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1 The Foreign Subsidies Regulation of the European Union: A New Instrument Levelling the Playing Field? Digitalization in Global Trade: Opportunities and Challenges for Investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1