金融服务业不当行为的原因和解决方案

Q2 Social Sciences Law and Financial Markets Review Pub Date : 2019-03-31 DOI:10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694
S. Turnbull
{"title":"金融服务业不当行为的原因和解决方案","authors":"S. Turnbull","doi":"10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the efficacy of the Australian government's 2018 initiatives to counter widespread misconduct identified by its Royal Commission into misconduct in the banking, superannuation and financial services industry. As regulators exist to protect stakeholders, introducing stakeholders as co-regulators provides continuous intimate comprehensive identification of misconduct. The role, size, cost and intrusiveness of regulators are reduced. Regulators could use their discretionary powers to encourage firms to: (a) remove current unethical conflicts inherent in corporate constitutions; (b) establish constructive management of other conflicts; (c) provide independent voice to stakeholders for improving operations, competiveness, reporting misconduct, harms, risks or unsatisfactory service.","PeriodicalId":43241,"journal":{"name":"Law and Financial Markets Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causes and solutions for misconduct in the financial services industry\",\"authors\":\"S. Turnbull\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers the efficacy of the Australian government's 2018 initiatives to counter widespread misconduct identified by its Royal Commission into misconduct in the banking, superannuation and financial services industry. As regulators exist to protect stakeholders, introducing stakeholders as co-regulators provides continuous intimate comprehensive identification of misconduct. The role, size, cost and intrusiveness of regulators are reduced. Regulators could use their discretionary powers to encourage firms to: (a) remove current unethical conflicts inherent in corporate constitutions; (b) establish constructive management of other conflicts; (c) provide independent voice to stakeholders for improving operations, competiveness, reporting misconduct, harms, risks or unsatisfactory service.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Financial Markets Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Financial Markets Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Financial Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1602694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文考虑了澳大利亚政府2018年举措的有效性,该举措旨在打击其皇家委员会认定的银行、养老金和金融服务业普遍存在的不当行为。由于监管机构的存在是为了保护利益相关者,引入利益相关者作为共同监管机构可以持续深入、全面地识别不当行为。监管机构的作用、规模、成本和侵扰性都有所降低。监管机构可以利用其自由裁量权鼓励企业:(a)消除当前公司章程中固有的不道德冲突;(b) 建立对其他冲突的建设性管理;(c) 为利益相关者提供独立的声音,以改善运营、竞争力、报告不当行为、危害、风险或不满意的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causes and solutions for misconduct in the financial services industry
This paper considers the efficacy of the Australian government's 2018 initiatives to counter widespread misconduct identified by its Royal Commission into misconduct in the banking, superannuation and financial services industry. As regulators exist to protect stakeholders, introducing stakeholders as co-regulators provides continuous intimate comprehensive identification of misconduct. The role, size, cost and intrusiveness of regulators are reduced. Regulators could use their discretionary powers to encourage firms to: (a) remove current unethical conflicts inherent in corporate constitutions; (b) establish constructive management of other conflicts; (c) provide independent voice to stakeholders for improving operations, competiveness, reporting misconduct, harms, risks or unsatisfactory service.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.
期刊最新文献
The fallout from the forex cartels: what legacy for foreign exchange regulation? Supervision of conduct of business: ensuring a fair deal for clients in Europe’s smallest member state Unleashing India's inventive capital: intellectual property as loan collateral Fintech: finance, technology and regulation The EU proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities on 13 June 2023: the missing piece of sustainable finance regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1