新冠肺炎和粮食安全是尼日利亚农村家庭冲突的催化剂:对翁多州Ilaje社区的研究

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research Pub Date : 2021-02-15 DOI:10.1108/JACPR-06-2020-0518
Tosin Seun Adebayo, Logo Oluwamayowa
{"title":"新冠肺炎和粮食安全是尼日利亚农村家庭冲突的催化剂:对翁多州Ilaje社区的研究","authors":"Tosin Seun Adebayo, Logo Oluwamayowa","doi":"10.1108/JACPR-06-2020-0518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe compulsory lockdown issued by the Nigeria Government to curb the spread of the virus has undoubtedly negatively affected the livelihoods of households. As a result, many have lost their sources of income and have no other means for survival. It is important to note that it has the potential of triggering violent conflicts and civil unrest as a popular African adage goes as thus: “A hungry man is an angry man”. Unfortunately, little attention has been given, neither has extant literature adequately covered the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak as it directly affects households in a rural community in Nigeria.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study proceeded from on both a qualitative and quantitative method and adopted a mixed-method and case study research design. Data for this study was collected through primary and secondary data. Primary data for this study was collected through a questionnaire and focus group discussions (FGD). The questionnaire used for this study was a validated instrument designed by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to measure food security amongst households. The USDA household’s instrument was used and then modified to access the food security status of households during the lockdown.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings from this study revealed that households, in general, were categorised as having “very low food security” during the lockdown as they testified to all the food insecure conditions. In general, the food intake of household members reported irregular eating patterns as the household lacked the money to purchase food. This study further indicated that a high number of respondents see violence as a means of attaining food. Extreme volatility in their inability to access food as a result of food shortages and the inability to benefit from government palliatives has been found to trigger incidents of conflict and malnutrition on households.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis method was sampling method was adopted because of the compulsory and constitutional lockdown imposed by the government to curb the spread of the novel COVID-19 which limited the movement of the researcher to other households in the community which proved to be limited during the time this research was carried limiting the scope of the sample size.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research adopted mixed-method research and was written by the researchers who did the study. This paper was conducted during the mandatory lockdown issued by the Federal Government in Nigeria with to understand the impact of the mandatory lockdown on rural households using Ilaje local of Ondo state as a case study while establishing a link between food security and conflict.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and food security as catalyst of conflict among rural households in Nigeria: a study of Ilaje community, Ondo state\",\"authors\":\"Tosin Seun Adebayo, Logo Oluwamayowa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JACPR-06-2020-0518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe compulsory lockdown issued by the Nigeria Government to curb the spread of the virus has undoubtedly negatively affected the livelihoods of households. As a result, many have lost their sources of income and have no other means for survival. It is important to note that it has the potential of triggering violent conflicts and civil unrest as a popular African adage goes as thus: “A hungry man is an angry man”. Unfortunately, little attention has been given, neither has extant literature adequately covered the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak as it directly affects households in a rural community in Nigeria.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study proceeded from on both a qualitative and quantitative method and adopted a mixed-method and case study research design. Data for this study was collected through primary and secondary data. Primary data for this study was collected through a questionnaire and focus group discussions (FGD). The questionnaire used for this study was a validated instrument designed by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to measure food security amongst households. The USDA household’s instrument was used and then modified to access the food security status of households during the lockdown.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFindings from this study revealed that households, in general, were categorised as having “very low food security” during the lockdown as they testified to all the food insecure conditions. In general, the food intake of household members reported irregular eating patterns as the household lacked the money to purchase food. This study further indicated that a high number of respondents see violence as a means of attaining food. Extreme volatility in their inability to access food as a result of food shortages and the inability to benefit from government palliatives has been found to trigger incidents of conflict and malnutrition on households.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis method was sampling method was adopted because of the compulsory and constitutional lockdown imposed by the government to curb the spread of the novel COVID-19 which limited the movement of the researcher to other households in the community which proved to be limited during the time this research was carried limiting the scope of the sample size.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research adopted mixed-method research and was written by the researchers who did the study. This paper was conducted during the mandatory lockdown issued by the Federal Government in Nigeria with to understand the impact of the mandatory lockdown on rural households using Ilaje local of Ondo state as a case study while establishing a link between food security and conflict.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-06-2020-0518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-06-2020-0518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的尼日利亚政府为遏制病毒传播而实施的强制封锁无疑对家庭生计产生了负面影响。结果,许多人失去了收入来源,没有其他生存手段。值得注意的是,它有可能引发暴力冲突和内乱,正如一句流行的非洲谚语所说:“饥饿的人就是愤怒的人”。不幸的是,人们很少关注,现有文献也没有充分报道冠状病毒(新冠肺炎)爆发的影响,因为它直接影响尼日利亚农村社区的家庭。设计/方法/方法这项研究从定性和定量两种方法出发,采用了混合方法和案例研究设计。本研究的数据是通过初级和次级数据收集的。本研究的主要数据是通过问卷调查和焦点小组讨论(FGD)收集的。本研究使用的问卷是美国农业部设计的一种经过验证的工具,用于衡量家庭的粮食安全。美国农业部家庭的仪器被使用,然后被修改,以获取封锁期间家庭的粮食安全状况。调查结果这项研究的结果显示,在封锁期间,家庭通常被归类为“粮食安全非常低”,因为他们证明了所有的粮食不安全状况。一般来说,家庭成员的食物摄入报告称,由于家庭缺乏购买食物的资金,他们的饮食模式不规律。这项研究进一步表明,大量受访者将暴力视为获取食物的手段。由于粮食短缺,他们无法获得粮食,而且无法从政府的缓解措施中受益,这种极端的波动性被发现会引发家庭冲突和营养不良事件。研究限制/含义之所以采用这种方法,是因为政府为遏制新型新冠肺炎的传播而实施了强制性和宪法封锁,这限制了研究人员向社区其他家庭的流动,而事实证明,在进行这项研究期间,这一流动受到了限制,限制了样本量的范围。原创性/价值本研究采用混合方法研究,由研究人员撰写。本文是在尼日利亚联邦政府发布强制封锁期间进行的,旨在了解强制封锁对农村家庭的影响,以翁多州Ilaje当地为例进行研究,同时建立粮食安全与冲突之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 and food security as catalyst of conflict among rural households in Nigeria: a study of Ilaje community, Ondo state
Purpose The compulsory lockdown issued by the Nigeria Government to curb the spread of the virus has undoubtedly negatively affected the livelihoods of households. As a result, many have lost their sources of income and have no other means for survival. It is important to note that it has the potential of triggering violent conflicts and civil unrest as a popular African adage goes as thus: “A hungry man is an angry man”. Unfortunately, little attention has been given, neither has extant literature adequately covered the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak as it directly affects households in a rural community in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach This study proceeded from on both a qualitative and quantitative method and adopted a mixed-method and case study research design. Data for this study was collected through primary and secondary data. Primary data for this study was collected through a questionnaire and focus group discussions (FGD). The questionnaire used for this study was a validated instrument designed by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to measure food security amongst households. The USDA household’s instrument was used and then modified to access the food security status of households during the lockdown. Findings Findings from this study revealed that households, in general, were categorised as having “very low food security” during the lockdown as they testified to all the food insecure conditions. In general, the food intake of household members reported irregular eating patterns as the household lacked the money to purchase food. This study further indicated that a high number of respondents see violence as a means of attaining food. Extreme volatility in their inability to access food as a result of food shortages and the inability to benefit from government palliatives has been found to trigger incidents of conflict and malnutrition on households. Research limitations/implications This method was sampling method was adopted because of the compulsory and constitutional lockdown imposed by the government to curb the spread of the novel COVID-19 which limited the movement of the researcher to other households in the community which proved to be limited during the time this research was carried limiting the scope of the sample size. Originality/value This research adopted mixed-method research and was written by the researchers who did the study. This paper was conducted during the mandatory lockdown issued by the Federal Government in Nigeria with to understand the impact of the mandatory lockdown on rural households using Ilaje local of Ondo state as a case study while establishing a link between food security and conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Why do they decide to stay? Experience of Indian women surviving intimate partner violence Invited commentary on using music intervention and imagined interaction to deal with aggression and conflict The appreciation of the collaboration agreements used to prevent intrafamilial homicides State responses to herder–farmers conflict and peace-building in rural grazing areas of Nigeria To stay silent or to blow the whistle? Bystander’s intervening acts when witnessing intimate partner violence (IPV)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1