对自由裁量信托行政不可操作性的再思考

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttab048

James P. Brown, M. Pawlowski

{"title":"对自由裁量信托行政不可操作性的再思考","authors":"James P. Brown, M. Pawlowski","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article seeks to explain the current doctrine of administrative unworkability as it applies to discretionary trusts in the context of English trust law with a view to identifying some of its problems and suggesting a reframing of the doctrine in terms of economic viability in the light of modern information technology.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-thinking administrative unworkability in discretionary trusts\",\"authors\":\"James P. Brown, M. Pawlowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttab048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article seeks to explain the current doctrine of administrative unworkability as it applies to discretionary trusts in the context of English trust law with a view to identifying some of its problems and suggesting a reframing of the doctrine in terms of economic viability in the light of modern information technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图在英国信托法的背景下解释当前适用于自由裁量信托的行政不可行原则，以找出其中的一些问题，并建议根据现代信息技术从经济可行性的角度重新定义该原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Re-thinking administrative unworkability in discretionary trusts

This article seeks to explain the current doctrine of administrative unworkability as it applies to discretionary trusts in the context of English trust law with a view to identifying some of its problems and suggesting a reframing of the doctrine in terms of economic viability in the light of modern information technology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Trusts & Trustees LAW-

自引率

66.70%

发文量