用有限元分析验证用于事故重建的破碎能量计算方法

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety Pub Date : 2018-10-04 DOI:10.4271/09-06-02-0009
Shusuke Numata, K. Mizuno, D. Ito, D. Okumura, H. Kinoshita
{"title":"用有限元分析验证用于事故重建的破碎能量计算方法","authors":"Shusuke Numata, K. Mizuno, D. Ito, D. Okumura, H. Kinoshita","doi":"10.4271/09-06-02-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crush energy is a key parameter to determine the delta-V in accident reconstructions. Since an accurate car crush profile can be obtained from 3D scanners, this research aims at validating the methods currently used in calculating crush energy from a crush profile. For this validation, a finite element (FE) car model was analyzed using various types of impact conditions to investigate the theory of energy-based accident reconstruction. Two methods exist to calculate the crush energy: the work based on the barrier force and the work based on force calculated by the vehicle acceleration times the vehicle mass. We show that the crush energy calculated from the barrier force was substantially larger than the internal energy calculated from the FE model. Whereas the crush energy calculated from the vehicle acceleration was comparable to the internal energy of the FE model. In full frontal impact simulations, the energy of approach factor (EAF) has a linear relation with the residual crush, which had been validated in previous experimental studies. In our study using FE analysis, we found that the slope of EAF versus the residual crush was comparable with that of the dynamic crush energy versus the dynamic crush for crashes at 55 km/h. Using this slope and the residual crush from a 55 km/h impact test, the slope and the intercept of the EAF vs. residual crush can be determined using only one crash test. A database of the slopes and the intercepts was made using Japan New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP) tests. In offset impact simulations, the crush energy calculated from the crush profile agreed with the internal energy of the car FE model when at least one front rail was involved. In oblique impacts, the correction factor for crush energy is not necessary within 20 degrees of principal direction of force of the car’s longitudinal axis. Downloaded from SAE International by Duke Univ, Friday, January 11, 2019","PeriodicalId":42847,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4271/09-06-02-0009","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Crush Energy Calculation Methods for Use in Accident Reconstructions by Finite Element Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shusuke Numata, K. Mizuno, D. Ito, D. Okumura, H. Kinoshita\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/09-06-02-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The crush energy is a key parameter to determine the delta-V in accident reconstructions. Since an accurate car crush profile can be obtained from 3D scanners, this research aims at validating the methods currently used in calculating crush energy from a crush profile. For this validation, a finite element (FE) car model was analyzed using various types of impact conditions to investigate the theory of energy-based accident reconstruction. Two methods exist to calculate the crush energy: the work based on the barrier force and the work based on force calculated by the vehicle acceleration times the vehicle mass. We show that the crush energy calculated from the barrier force was substantially larger than the internal energy calculated from the FE model. Whereas the crush energy calculated from the vehicle acceleration was comparable to the internal energy of the FE model. In full frontal impact simulations, the energy of approach factor (EAF) has a linear relation with the residual crush, which had been validated in previous experimental studies. In our study using FE analysis, we found that the slope of EAF versus the residual crush was comparable with that of the dynamic crush energy versus the dynamic crush for crashes at 55 km/h. Using this slope and the residual crush from a 55 km/h impact test, the slope and the intercept of the EAF vs. residual crush can be determined using only one crash test. A database of the slopes and the intercepts was made using Japan New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP) tests. In offset impact simulations, the crush energy calculated from the crush profile agreed with the internal energy of the car FE model when at least one front rail was involved. In oblique impacts, the correction factor for crush energy is not necessary within 20 degrees of principal direction of force of the car’s longitudinal axis. Downloaded from SAE International by Duke Univ, Friday, January 11, 2019\",\"PeriodicalId\":42847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4271/09-06-02-0009\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/09-06-02-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/09-06-02-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在事故重建中,粉碎能是确定δ - v的关键参数。由于可以通过3D扫描仪获得精确的汽车挤压剖面,因此本研究旨在验证目前用于从挤压剖面计算挤压能量的方法。为了验证这一点,在不同类型的碰撞条件下,对有限元(FE)汽车模型进行了分析,研究了基于能量的事故重建理论。粉碎能的计算方法有两种:基于屏障力的功和基于车辆加速度乘以车辆质量计算的力的功。我们表明,从屏障力计算的粉碎能大大大于从有限元模型计算的内能。而根据车辆加速度计算的碰撞能与有限元模型的内能相当。在全正面碰撞仿真中,接近因子能量(EAF)与碰撞残余压碎量呈线性关系,这一结论在前人的实验研究中得到了验证。在我们使用有限元分析的研究中,我们发现在55 km/h的碰撞中,EAF与残余碾压的斜率与动态碾压能量与动态碾压的斜率相当。利用这个斜率和55公里/小时碰撞试验的残余碾压,只需要一次碰撞试验就可以确定EAF与残余碾压的斜率和截距。利用日本新车评估程序(JNCAP)测试建立了坡度和截距数据库。在偏置碰撞仿真中,当至少有一根前轨参与时,从碰撞剖面计算的碰撞能与汽车有限元模型的内能一致。在倾斜碰撞中,在汽车纵轴主力方向的20度以内,不需要对粉碎能量进行修正系数。杜克大学从SAE International下载,2019年1月11日星期五
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Crush Energy Calculation Methods for Use in Accident Reconstructions by Finite Element Analysis
The crush energy is a key parameter to determine the delta-V in accident reconstructions. Since an accurate car crush profile can be obtained from 3D scanners, this research aims at validating the methods currently used in calculating crush energy from a crush profile. For this validation, a finite element (FE) car model was analyzed using various types of impact conditions to investigate the theory of energy-based accident reconstruction. Two methods exist to calculate the crush energy: the work based on the barrier force and the work based on force calculated by the vehicle acceleration times the vehicle mass. We show that the crush energy calculated from the barrier force was substantially larger than the internal energy calculated from the FE model. Whereas the crush energy calculated from the vehicle acceleration was comparable to the internal energy of the FE model. In full frontal impact simulations, the energy of approach factor (EAF) has a linear relation with the residual crush, which had been validated in previous experimental studies. In our study using FE analysis, we found that the slope of EAF versus the residual crush was comparable with that of the dynamic crush energy versus the dynamic crush for crashes at 55 km/h. Using this slope and the residual crush from a 55 km/h impact test, the slope and the intercept of the EAF vs. residual crush can be determined using only one crash test. A database of the slopes and the intercepts was made using Japan New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP) tests. In offset impact simulations, the crush energy calculated from the crush profile agreed with the internal energy of the car FE model when at least one front rail was involved. In oblique impacts, the correction factor for crush energy is not necessary within 20 degrees of principal direction of force of the car’s longitudinal axis. Downloaded from SAE International by Duke Univ, Friday, January 11, 2019
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploration of the Heterogeneity among Elderly Drivers by Analyzing Traffic Crash Data: A Case Study in Pennsylvania, USA Bayesian Network Model and Causal Analysis of Ship Collisions in Zhejiang Coastal Waters Assessing the Impact of Rubberized Asphalt on Reducing Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly Populations Using Human Body Models Experimental Study on Ship Squat in Intermediate Channel Study of Vehicle-Based Metrics for Assessing the Severity of Side Impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1