青春期和成年妇女新生儿和胎盘重量的比较

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2018-12-03 DOI:10.7196/SAJOG.1296
A. Cersosimo, E. A. Júnior, E. Santana, B. D. C. França, F. Vasques
{"title":"青春期和成年妇女新生儿和胎盘重量的比较","authors":"A. Cersosimo, E. A. Júnior, E. Santana, B. D. C. França, F. Vasques","doi":"10.7196/SAJOG.1296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Low placental weight is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Adolescent pregnant women are associated with higher preterm labour, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction rates than adult pregnant women.  Objective. To compare placental and newborn weights between groups of adolescent (≤19 years old) and adult mothers (20 - 28 years old).  Methods. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with primiparous mothers who had their deliveries at ≥37 weeks’ gestation, and without maternal chronic disease or obstetrical intercurrence. Adolescents were divided into two groups (group A1, aged <15 years; group A2, 15 - 19 years), and the outcomes compared with a control group of adult mothers aged 20 - 28 years (group B). Group A1 included 23 newborns and 18 placentas, group A2 comprised 28 newborns and 28 placentas, and group B included 27 newborns and 27 placentas. The placental and newborn weights were compared between the groups using Student’s t -test for paired samples.  Results. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) weights of the newborns and placentas in group A were significantly lower than those in group B: 3167.8 g (359.6) v. 3404.0 g (136.8) ( p =0.0016) and 573.7 g (98.7) v. 651.0 g (109.8) ( p =0.0028), respectively. The mean (SD) newborn and placental weights in group A1 were significantly lower than those in group A2: 2996.0 g (373.7) v. 3309.0 g (273.6) ( p =0.0012) and 513.0 g (94.9) v. 612.5 g (73.8) ( p =0.0026), respectively.  Conclusion. The placental and newborn weights were significantly lower in the adolescent groups, and this difference was more pronounced in the younger of the adolescent groups.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJOG.1296","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of newborn and placental weights between adolescent and adult women\",\"authors\":\"A. Cersosimo, E. A. Júnior, E. Santana, B. D. C. França, F. Vasques\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJOG.1296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Low placental weight is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Adolescent pregnant women are associated with higher preterm labour, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction rates than adult pregnant women.  Objective. To compare placental and newborn weights between groups of adolescent (≤19 years old) and adult mothers (20 - 28 years old).  Methods. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with primiparous mothers who had their deliveries at ≥37 weeks’ gestation, and without maternal chronic disease or obstetrical intercurrence. Adolescents were divided into two groups (group A1, aged <15 years; group A2, 15 - 19 years), and the outcomes compared with a control group of adult mothers aged 20 - 28 years (group B). Group A1 included 23 newborns and 18 placentas, group A2 comprised 28 newborns and 28 placentas, and group B included 27 newborns and 27 placentas. The placental and newborn weights were compared between the groups using Student’s t -test for paired samples.  Results. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) weights of the newborns and placentas in group A were significantly lower than those in group B: 3167.8 g (359.6) v. 3404.0 g (136.8) ( p =0.0016) and 573.7 g (98.7) v. 651.0 g (109.8) ( p =0.0028), respectively. The mean (SD) newborn and placental weights in group A1 were significantly lower than those in group A2: 2996.0 g (373.7) v. 3309.0 g (273.6) ( p =0.0012) and 513.0 g (94.9) v. 612.5 g (73.8) ( p =0.0026), respectively.  Conclusion. The placental and newborn weights were significantly lower in the adolescent groups, and this difference was more pronounced in the younger of the adolescent groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJOG.1296\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景胎盘重量低与不良围产期结局有关。与成年孕妇相比,青少年孕妇的早产率、低出生体重和胎儿生长受限率较高。目标。比较青春期(≤19岁)和成年母亲(20-28岁)组的胎盘和新生儿重量。方法。一项前瞻性横断面研究是对妊娠≥37周分娩且没有母亲慢性疾病或产科并发症的初产妇进行的。青少年被分为两组(A1组,年龄<15岁;A2组,15-19岁),并与年龄为20-28岁的成年母亲对照组(B组)进行比较。A1组包括23个新生儿和18个胎盘,A2组包括28个新生儿和28个胎盘,B组包括27个新生儿和27个胎盘。使用配对样本的Student t检验比较两组之间的胎盘和新生儿重量。结果。A组新生儿和胎盘的平均重量(标准差(SD))显著低于B组:分别为3167.8克(359.6)对3404.0克(136.8)(p=0.0016)和573.7克(98.7)对651.0克(109.8)(p=0.0028)。A1组新生儿和胎盘的平均重量(SD)显著低于A2组:分别为2996.0 g(373.7)vs.3309.0 g(273.6)(p=0.0012)和513.0 g(94.9)vs.612.5 g(73.8)(p=0.0026)。结论。青少年组的胎盘和新生儿重量明显较低,而这种差异在年轻的青少年组中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of newborn and placental weights between adolescent and adult women
Background. Low placental weight is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Adolescent pregnant women are associated with higher preterm labour, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction rates than adult pregnant women.  Objective. To compare placental and newborn weights between groups of adolescent (≤19 years old) and adult mothers (20 - 28 years old).  Methods. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with primiparous mothers who had their deliveries at ≥37 weeks’ gestation, and without maternal chronic disease or obstetrical intercurrence. Adolescents were divided into two groups (group A1, aged <15 years; group A2, 15 - 19 years), and the outcomes compared with a control group of adult mothers aged 20 - 28 years (group B). Group A1 included 23 newborns and 18 placentas, group A2 comprised 28 newborns and 28 placentas, and group B included 27 newborns and 27 placentas. The placental and newborn weights were compared between the groups using Student’s t -test for paired samples.  Results. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) weights of the newborns and placentas in group A were significantly lower than those in group B: 3167.8 g (359.6) v. 3404.0 g (136.8) ( p =0.0016) and 573.7 g (98.7) v. 651.0 g (109.8) ( p =0.0028), respectively. The mean (SD) newborn and placental weights in group A1 were significantly lower than those in group A2: 2996.0 g (373.7) v. 3309.0 g (273.6) ( p =0.0012) and 513.0 g (94.9) v. 612.5 g (73.8) ( p =0.0026), respectively.  Conclusion. The placental and newborn weights were significantly lower in the adolescent groups, and this difference was more pronounced in the younger of the adolescent groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Is medicine a process of scientific rigour? How to care for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed severe abnormalities Prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with antenatal depression among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa Age-related changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women of reproductive age in Kenya An assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian tumours at a public hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1