特刊《团队领导力的国际视角》简介

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Educational Administration & Leadership Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI:10.30828/REAL/2018.2.1
L. Björk, Tricia Browne-Ferrigno
{"title":"特刊《团队领导力的国际视角》简介","authors":"L. Björk, Tricia Browne-Ferrigno","doi":"10.30828/REAL/2018.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last several decades, the rise of the global economy launched an array of social, economic, and political changes in nations throughout the world. These shifts contributed to heightened concern about the quality of schools and resulted in what “arguably is the most intense, comprehensive, and sustained effort to reform education in America’s history” (Bjork, 2001, p. 19). As policymakers and economists linked academic performance of students to their nation’s long-term economic survival, the scope and duration of educational reform around the globe expanded exponentially (Daun, 2002; Pang, 2013; Zhao, 2009). In retrospect, efforts to ensure national economic wellbeing have been defined by educational policies focused on ensuring broad-based access to schooling (Means, 2018), achieving academic excellence among students (Hanushek, Jamison, Jamison, & Woessman, 2008), networking among schools and students (Bathon, 2011; Glazer & Peurach, 2013), and reconceptualizing schooling (Ball, 2009; Mullen, 2017; Osborne, 2017). In many instances, these protracted efforts altered the conversation about education reform, particularly with regard to reconfiguring how leaders work (Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011; Hairon, 2017; Nir, 2014).","PeriodicalId":41311,"journal":{"name":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Special Issue International Perspectives on Team Leadership\",\"authors\":\"L. Björk, Tricia Browne-Ferrigno\",\"doi\":\"10.30828/REAL/2018.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last several decades, the rise of the global economy launched an array of social, economic, and political changes in nations throughout the world. These shifts contributed to heightened concern about the quality of schools and resulted in what “arguably is the most intense, comprehensive, and sustained effort to reform education in America’s history” (Bjork, 2001, p. 19). As policymakers and economists linked academic performance of students to their nation’s long-term economic survival, the scope and duration of educational reform around the globe expanded exponentially (Daun, 2002; Pang, 2013; Zhao, 2009). In retrospect, efforts to ensure national economic wellbeing have been defined by educational policies focused on ensuring broad-based access to schooling (Means, 2018), achieving academic excellence among students (Hanushek, Jamison, Jamison, & Woessman, 2008), networking among schools and students (Bathon, 2011; Glazer & Peurach, 2013), and reconceptualizing schooling (Ball, 2009; Mullen, 2017; Osborne, 2017). In many instances, these protracted efforts altered the conversation about education reform, particularly with regard to reconfiguring how leaders work (Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011; Hairon, 2017; Nir, 2014).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2018.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2018.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的几十年里,全球经济的崛起在世界各国引发了一系列社会、经济和政治变革。这些转变引起了人们对学校质量的高度关注,并导致了“可以说是美国历史上最激烈、最全面、最持久的教育改革努力”(比约克,2001年,第19页)。随着政策制定者和经济学家将学生的学习成绩与国家的长期经济生存联系起来,全球教育改革的范围和持续时间呈指数级增长(Daun, 2002;庞,2013;赵,2009)。回顾过去,确保国民经济福祉的努力是由教育政策定义的,其重点是确保广泛的上学机会(Means, 2018),实现学生的学业卓越(Hanushek, Jamison, Jamison, & Woessman, 2008),学校和学生之间的网络(Bathon, 2011;Glazer & Peurach, 2013),以及重新定义学校教育(Ball, 2009;马伦,2017;奥斯本,2017)。在许多情况下,这些长期的努力改变了关于教育改革的对话,特别是关于重新配置领导者的工作方式(Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011;Hairon, 2017;近红外光谱,2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction to Special Issue International Perspectives on Team Leadership
During the last several decades, the rise of the global economy launched an array of social, economic, and political changes in nations throughout the world. These shifts contributed to heightened concern about the quality of schools and resulted in what “arguably is the most intense, comprehensive, and sustained effort to reform education in America’s history” (Bjork, 2001, p. 19). As policymakers and economists linked academic performance of students to their nation’s long-term economic survival, the scope and duration of educational reform around the globe expanded exponentially (Daun, 2002; Pang, 2013; Zhao, 2009). In retrospect, efforts to ensure national economic wellbeing have been defined by educational policies focused on ensuring broad-based access to schooling (Means, 2018), achieving academic excellence among students (Hanushek, Jamison, Jamison, & Woessman, 2008), networking among schools and students (Bathon, 2011; Glazer & Peurach, 2013), and reconceptualizing schooling (Ball, 2009; Mullen, 2017; Osborne, 2017). In many instances, these protracted efforts altered the conversation about education reform, particularly with regard to reconfiguring how leaders work (Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011; Hairon, 2017; Nir, 2014).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
School Administrators’ Priorities for Legal Literacy Training Teachers’ Organizational Commitment: The Role of Demographic Characteristics and Their Psychological Empowerment in Turkey Studying negative aspects in work organizations: The benefits of qualitative methodologies Evaluation of Image Studies in the Field of Education: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the implementation of school discipline policy in Ghanaian basic schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1