{"title":"1914年重访:证据与诡辩","authors":"John Zametica","doi":"10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response","PeriodicalId":36359,"journal":{"name":"Tokovi Istorije","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1914 Revisited: Evidence vs. Sophistry\",\"authors\":\"John Zametica\",\"doi\":\"10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response\",\"PeriodicalId\":36359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tokovi Istorije\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tokovi Istorije\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokovi Istorije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
