民事诉讼中检察官参与协商程序的假设模式。立法会议和立法会议的发言

Probacja Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0016.1625
Tomasz Demendecki
{"title":"民事诉讼中检察官参与协商程序的假设模式。立法会议和立法会议的发言","authors":"Tomasz Demendecki","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this study is a critical analysis of the current solutions in the field of civil procedural law, concerning the mechanism of ensuring the effectiveness and enforceability of foreign judgments on the territory of the Republic of Poland. As part of the 2008 amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure, the legislator removed from art. 1148, providing for the obligatory participation of the prosecutor in the delibation proceedings. Contrary to the previously and currently applicable regulations of the civil procedural law, it is proposed to leave the exclusion of the obligatory participation of the prosecutor in the delibation proceedings. At the same time, the possible introduction of the adjudicating court's obligation to inform the indicated public interest ombudsman about the initiation of delibation proceedings is under consideration, leaving the prosecutor an independent decision on whether to join the initiated proceedings (Article 59 in connection with Article 13 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure). Such a solution, providing for the obligation of the court to deliver to the prosecutor a copy of each motion initiating delibation proceedings, would be a compromise, because on the one hand it should not result in an excessive increase in the obligations of the prosecutor's office, but on the other hand, in doubtful situations it would allow for the real participation of the prosecutor in the proceedings.\n\n","PeriodicalId":34028,"journal":{"name":"Probacja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The postulated model of the prosecutor's participation in the delibation proceedings in civil cases. De lege lata and de lege ferenda remarks\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Demendecki\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of this study is a critical analysis of the current solutions in the field of civil procedural law, concerning the mechanism of ensuring the effectiveness and enforceability of foreign judgments on the territory of the Republic of Poland. As part of the 2008 amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure, the legislator removed from art. 1148, providing for the obligatory participation of the prosecutor in the delibation proceedings. Contrary to the previously and currently applicable regulations of the civil procedural law, it is proposed to leave the exclusion of the obligatory participation of the prosecutor in the delibation proceedings. At the same time, the possible introduction of the adjudicating court's obligation to inform the indicated public interest ombudsman about the initiation of delibation proceedings is under consideration, leaving the prosecutor an independent decision on whether to join the initiated proceedings (Article 59 in connection with Article 13 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure). Such a solution, providing for the obligation of the court to deliver to the prosecutor a copy of each motion initiating delibation proceedings, would be a compromise, because on the one hand it should not result in an excessive increase in the obligations of the prosecutor's office, but on the other hand, in doubtful situations it would allow for the real participation of the prosecutor in the proceedings.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probacja\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probacja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主题是对民事诉讼法领域目前的解决方案进行批判性分析,涉及确保外国判决在波兰共和国领土上的有效性和可执行性的机制。作为2008年《民事诉讼法》修正案的一部分,立法者删除了第1148条,该条规定检察官必须参与提交程序。与以前和目前适用的民事诉讼法条例相反,建议排除检察官强制性参与移交程序的情况。与此同时,正在考虑是否可能引入裁决法院的义务,告知指定的公共利益监察员提交程序的启动情况,让检察官就是否加入启动的程序做出独立决定(第59条与《民事诉讼法》第13条第2款有关)。这种解决办法规定,法院有义务向检察官提交启动审议程序的每一项动议的副本,这将是一种妥协,因为一方面这不应导致检察官办公室的义务过度增加,但另一方面,在可疑情况下,它将允许检察官真正参与诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The postulated model of the prosecutor's participation in the delibation proceedings in civil cases. De lege lata and de lege ferenda remarks
The subject of this study is a critical analysis of the current solutions in the field of civil procedural law, concerning the mechanism of ensuring the effectiveness and enforceability of foreign judgments on the territory of the Republic of Poland. As part of the 2008 amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure, the legislator removed from art. 1148, providing for the obligatory participation of the prosecutor in the delibation proceedings. Contrary to the previously and currently applicable regulations of the civil procedural law, it is proposed to leave the exclusion of the obligatory participation of the prosecutor in the delibation proceedings. At the same time, the possible introduction of the adjudicating court's obligation to inform the indicated public interest ombudsman about the initiation of delibation proceedings is under consideration, leaving the prosecutor an independent decision on whether to join the initiated proceedings (Article 59 in connection with Article 13 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure). Such a solution, providing for the obligation of the court to deliver to the prosecutor a copy of each motion initiating delibation proceedings, would be a compromise, because on the one hand it should not result in an excessive increase in the obligations of the prosecutor's office, but on the other hand, in doubtful situations it would allow for the real participation of the prosecutor in the proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and criminal behavior: a psychological profile of convicts serving custodial sentences. Pilot studies Basics of improving special protection for convicted persons – critical remarks Firmant and the problem of identifying a taxpayer in an organized criminal group Criminal law protection of religious freedom amid contemporary challenges and threats Forfission of an enterprise and the burd of proof in criminal process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1