Lauren Wadsworth, Inga Wessman, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Bjorgvinsson
{"title":"短期局部医院环境中感知控制和治疗反应的水平","authors":"Lauren Wadsworth, Inga Wessman, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Bjorgvinsson","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2019.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Perceived internal and external control have long been theorized to relate to development and maintenance of anxiety (Barlow, 2002) and depression (Seligman, 1975). Experimental research studies investigating perceived control have largely focused on anxiety within cross-sectional samples and have shown that low levels of perceived internal and external control are associated with higher levels of anxiety (Gallagher et al., 2014) and depression (Brown & Siegel, 1988; Wardle et al., 2004). The majority of previous research has looked at the combined effects of perceived internal and external control and has not investigated these constructs as potential treatment targets in intensive, short-term clinical settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The current study examined the associations of perceived internal and external control as they relate to anxiety and depression symptom change in a partial hospital sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both perceived internal and external control increased significantly over brief, intensive treatment. Further, greater gains in internal perceived control were related to greater reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our study was limited in that it did not include a control group or follow-up data. This study provides evidence that perceived internal control is related to change in symptoms in a diagnostically diverse and severe population, after very brief intensive treatment. Future studies should investigate if perceived internal control is a mechanism of change in treatment and explore how to maximize the development of perceived internal control in treatment, to maximize reduction in symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":"34 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2019.08.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels of perceived control and treatment response in a brief partial hospital setting\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Wadsworth, Inga Wessman, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Bjorgvinsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.npbr.2019.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Perceived internal and external control have long been theorized to relate to development and maintenance of anxiety (Barlow, 2002) and depression (Seligman, 1975). Experimental research studies investigating perceived control have largely focused on anxiety within cross-sectional samples and have shown that low levels of perceived internal and external control are associated with higher levels of anxiety (Gallagher et al., 2014) and depression (Brown & Siegel, 1988; Wardle et al., 2004). The majority of previous research has looked at the combined effects of perceived internal and external control and has not investigated these constructs as potential treatment targets in intensive, short-term clinical settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The current study examined the associations of perceived internal and external control as they relate to anxiety and depression symptom change in a partial hospital sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both perceived internal and external control increased significantly over brief, intensive treatment. Further, greater gains in internal perceived control were related to greater reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our study was limited in that it did not include a control group or follow-up data. This study provides evidence that perceived internal control is related to change in symptoms in a diagnostically diverse and severe population, after very brief intensive treatment. Future studies should investigate if perceived internal control is a mechanism of change in treatment and explore how to maximize the development of perceived internal control in treatment, to maximize reduction in symptoms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2019.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950019300582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950019300582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
长期以来,人们一直认为感知的内部和外部控制与焦虑(Barlow, 2002)和抑郁(Seligman, 1975)的发展和维持有关。调查感知控制的实验研究主要集中在横断面样本中的焦虑,并表明低水平的感知内部和外部控制与较高水平的焦虑(Gallagher等人,2014)和抑郁(Brown &西格尔,1988;Wardle et al., 2004)。大多数先前的研究着眼于感知到的内部和外部控制的联合效应,并没有研究这些结构在强化的短期临床环境中作为潜在的治疗目标。方法本研究在部分医院样本中考察了感知的内部和外部控制与焦虑和抑郁症状变化的关系。结果在短期强化治疗中,患者的内外部控制均显著增加。此外,内部感知控制的更大收益与焦虑和抑郁症状的更大减少有关。我们的研究是有限的,因为它没有包括对照组或随访数据。本研究提供的证据表明,在经过非常短暂的强化治疗后,在诊断多样化和严重的人群中,感知到的内部控制与症状变化有关。未来的研究应探讨感知内控制是否是治疗改变的机制,并探讨如何在治疗中最大限度地发展感知内控制,以最大限度地减轻症状。
Levels of perceived control and treatment response in a brief partial hospital setting
Background
Perceived internal and external control have long been theorized to relate to development and maintenance of anxiety (Barlow, 2002) and depression (Seligman, 1975). Experimental research studies investigating perceived control have largely focused on anxiety within cross-sectional samples and have shown that low levels of perceived internal and external control are associated with higher levels of anxiety (Gallagher et al., 2014) and depression (Brown & Siegel, 1988; Wardle et al., 2004). The majority of previous research has looked at the combined effects of perceived internal and external control and has not investigated these constructs as potential treatment targets in intensive, short-term clinical settings.
Methods
The current study examined the associations of perceived internal and external control as they relate to anxiety and depression symptom change in a partial hospital sample.
Results
Both perceived internal and external control increased significantly over brief, intensive treatment. Further, greater gains in internal perceived control were related to greater reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms.
Discussion
Our study was limited in that it did not include a control group or follow-up data. This study provides evidence that perceived internal control is related to change in symptoms in a diagnostically diverse and severe population, after very brief intensive treatment. Future studies should investigate if perceived internal control is a mechanism of change in treatment and explore how to maximize the development of perceived internal control in treatment, to maximize reduction in symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in
biological psychiatry,
brain research,
neurology,
neuropsychiatry,
neuropsychoimmunology,
psychopathology,
psychotherapy.
The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version.
Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.