退休统计意义?2006年世界杯对就业影响的再评价

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Finance Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.32731/ijsf/172.052022.02
W. Maennig, Cristina Sattarhoff, P. Stahlecker
{"title":"退休统计意义?2006年世界杯对就业影响的再评价","authors":"W. Maennig, Cristina Sattarhoff, P. Stahlecker","doi":"10.32731/ijsf/172.052022.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost all econometric analyses of mega sporting events show nonsignificant results, i.e., they fail to reject the null hypothesis at the usual α levels of significance. Our contribution takes up the recent critique against the usual handling of the term of significance and qualifies the common interpretation that from a statistical point of view, the effects of mega sporting events are not significant. For this purpose, we use employment data from the World Cup 2006 in Germany. We determine empirical power functions of the relevant t-tests by means of a simulation study with autocorrelated and heteroscedastic error terms. In addition, we consider equivalence tests. Despite the relatively large goodness of fit of the model, it is not possible to reject the hypothesis of zero employment effects of the World Cup. At the same time, our simulation experiments show that even a fundamental raise/decline in unemployment in the World Cup venues of 6 to 7 percentage points would not be recognized in 50% of all cases","PeriodicalId":45894,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retire Statistical Significance? Reevaluation of the Employment Effects of the 2006 World Cup\",\"authors\":\"W. Maennig, Cristina Sattarhoff, P. Stahlecker\",\"doi\":\"10.32731/ijsf/172.052022.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Almost all econometric analyses of mega sporting events show nonsignificant results, i.e., they fail to reject the null hypothesis at the usual α levels of significance. Our contribution takes up the recent critique against the usual handling of the term of significance and qualifies the common interpretation that from a statistical point of view, the effects of mega sporting events are not significant. For this purpose, we use employment data from the World Cup 2006 in Germany. We determine empirical power functions of the relevant t-tests by means of a simulation study with autocorrelated and heteroscedastic error terms. In addition, we consider equivalence tests. Despite the relatively large goodness of fit of the model, it is not possible to reject the hypothesis of zero employment effects of the World Cup. At the same time, our simulation experiments show that even a fundamental raise/decline in unemployment in the World Cup venues of 6 to 7 percentage points would not be recognized in 50% of all cases\",\"PeriodicalId\":45894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sport Finance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sport Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32731/ijsf/172.052022.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32731/ijsf/172.052022.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几乎所有大型体育赛事的计量经济学分析都显示出不显著的结果,即,它们无法在通常的显著性水平上拒绝原假设。我们的贡献接受了最近对通常处理意义术语的批评,并从统计的角度出发,对大型体育赛事的影响不显著的共同解释进行了定性。为此,我们使用了2006年德国世界杯的就业数据。我们通过自相关和异方差误差项的模拟研究来确定相关t检验的经验幂函数。此外,我们考虑等效检验。尽管模型的拟合优度比较大,但也不能否定世界杯零就业效应的假设。与此同时,我们的模拟实验表明,在所有情况下,即使是世界杯赛场失业率的根本性上升/下降6至7个百分点,也有50%的情况不会被识别出来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retire Statistical Significance? Reevaluation of the Employment Effects of the 2006 World Cup
Almost all econometric analyses of mega sporting events show nonsignificant results, i.e., they fail to reject the null hypothesis at the usual α levels of significance. Our contribution takes up the recent critique against the usual handling of the term of significance and qualifies the common interpretation that from a statistical point of view, the effects of mega sporting events are not significant. For this purpose, we use employment data from the World Cup 2006 in Germany. We determine empirical power functions of the relevant t-tests by means of a simulation study with autocorrelated and heteroscedastic error terms. In addition, we consider equivalence tests. Despite the relatively large goodness of fit of the model, it is not possible to reject the hypothesis of zero employment effects of the World Cup. At the same time, our simulation experiments show that even a fundamental raise/decline in unemployment in the World Cup venues of 6 to 7 percentage points would not be recognized in 50% of all cases
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Finance
International Journal of Sport Finance HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Re-Evaluating the Role of Attendance on Home Advantage: Evidence From an International Rugby Tournament Participants’ Willingness to Pay for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions at Large-Scale Sports-Tourism Events Pay and Performance in Men’s and Women’s Football: Comparing the MLS and NWSL College Football Television and Attendance: The Problem With Selection Bias The Stock Market Reaction to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics: Evidence from Japanese Sponsors and Taiwanese Olympic-Related Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1