利用公民科学来评估和改善都市公园的利用:密苏里州圣路易斯的公园活动、娱乐和社区研究(PARCS)

Á. O'Connor, A. King, A. Banchoff, A. Eyler, Rodrigo Reis, Ross C Brownson, Eugen Resendiz, Derek Holland, Deborah Salvo
{"title":"利用公民科学来评估和改善都市公园的利用:密苏里州圣路易斯的公园活动、娱乐和社区研究(PARCS)","authors":"Á. O'Connor, A. King, A. Banchoff, A. Eyler, Rodrigo Reis, Ross C Brownson, Eugen Resendiz, Derek Holland, Deborah Salvo","doi":"10.51250/jheal.v1i4.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to and use of parks is associated with physical activity participation. Our Voice is a systematic method blending community-based participatory research (CBPR) and citizen science. As part of a comprehensive, mixed-methods study in St. Louis, Missouri (PARCS), we tested the feasibility of the Our Voice method for gathering community input on the barriers to and facilitators of accessibility and use of large metropolitan parks, by describing the implementation of the Our Voice method among recreational and commuter users of a large metropolitan park in St. Louis, MO. Due to challenges posed by COVID-19, the Our Voice methodology was adapted for remote participation. Twenty-three citizen scientists (14 recreational park users and 9 commuters) collected and analyzed geolocated route, photo, and audio or text data on facilitators and barriers to park use and access. They identified 6 priority themes and 12 solution ideas, and presented them to stakeholders. In contrast to previous Our Voice studies, separate user groups (recreation and commuter users) independently prioritized many of the same themes. Adaptation of the Our Voice protocol to virtual practices during COVID-19 revealed positive implications for cost, reach, and scale of studies grounded in CBPR and citizen science. We provide a set of recommended practices for using Our Voice as a method to evaluate and promote equity of access and use of metropolitan parks.","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"1 1","pages":"198 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing Citizen Science to Assess and Improve Utilization of Metropolitan Parks: the Park Activity, Recreation, and Community Study (PARCS) in St. Louis, MO\",\"authors\":\"Á. O'Connor, A. King, A. Banchoff, A. Eyler, Rodrigo Reis, Ross C Brownson, Eugen Resendiz, Derek Holland, Deborah Salvo\",\"doi\":\"10.51250/jheal.v1i4.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Access to and use of parks is associated with physical activity participation. Our Voice is a systematic method blending community-based participatory research (CBPR) and citizen science. As part of a comprehensive, mixed-methods study in St. Louis, Missouri (PARCS), we tested the feasibility of the Our Voice method for gathering community input on the barriers to and facilitators of accessibility and use of large metropolitan parks, by describing the implementation of the Our Voice method among recreational and commuter users of a large metropolitan park in St. Louis, MO. Due to challenges posed by COVID-19, the Our Voice methodology was adapted for remote participation. Twenty-three citizen scientists (14 recreational park users and 9 commuters) collected and analyzed geolocated route, photo, and audio or text data on facilitators and barriers to park use and access. They identified 6 priority themes and 12 solution ideas, and presented them to stakeholders. In contrast to previous Our Voice studies, separate user groups (recreation and commuter users) independently prioritized many of the same themes. Adaptation of the Our Voice protocol to virtual practices during COVID-19 revealed positive implications for cost, reach, and scale of studies grounded in CBPR and citizen science. We provide a set of recommended practices for using Our Voice as a method to evaluate and promote equity of access and use of metropolitan parks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthy eating and active living\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthy eating and active living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51250/jheal.v1i4.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51250/jheal.v1i4.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

进入和使用公园与参加体育活动有关。我们的声音是一种系统的方法,融合了基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)和公民科学。作为密苏里州圣路易斯市一项综合、混合方法研究(PARCS)的一部分,我们通过描述“我们的声音”方法在密苏里州圣路易斯一个大型都市公园的娱乐和通勤用户中的实施情况,测试了“我们的声音”方法收集社区对大型都市公园无障碍和使用便利因素的意见的可行性。由于新冠肺炎带来的挑战,我们的声音方法适用于远程参与。23名公民科学家(14名娱乐公园用户和9名通勤者)收集并分析了地理定位路线、照片、音频或文本数据,这些数据涉及公园使用和进入的促进者和障碍。他们确定了6个优先主题和12个解决方案想法,并将其提交给利益攸关方。与之前的“我们的声音”研究相比,不同的用户群体(娱乐和通勤用户)独立地优先考虑了许多相同的主题。在新冠肺炎期间,我们的声音协议对虚拟实践的适应揭示了对基于CBPR和公民科学的研究的成本、范围和规模的积极影响。我们提供了一套建议做法,将“我们的声音”作为评估和促进进入和使用大都市公园公平性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harnessing Citizen Science to Assess and Improve Utilization of Metropolitan Parks: the Park Activity, Recreation, and Community Study (PARCS) in St. Louis, MO
Access to and use of parks is associated with physical activity participation. Our Voice is a systematic method blending community-based participatory research (CBPR) and citizen science. As part of a comprehensive, mixed-methods study in St. Louis, Missouri (PARCS), we tested the feasibility of the Our Voice method for gathering community input on the barriers to and facilitators of accessibility and use of large metropolitan parks, by describing the implementation of the Our Voice method among recreational and commuter users of a large metropolitan park in St. Louis, MO. Due to challenges posed by COVID-19, the Our Voice methodology was adapted for remote participation. Twenty-three citizen scientists (14 recreational park users and 9 commuters) collected and analyzed geolocated route, photo, and audio or text data on facilitators and barriers to park use and access. They identified 6 priority themes and 12 solution ideas, and presented them to stakeholders. In contrast to previous Our Voice studies, separate user groups (recreation and commuter users) independently prioritized many of the same themes. Adaptation of the Our Voice protocol to virtual practices during COVID-19 revealed positive implications for cost, reach, and scale of studies grounded in CBPR and citizen science. We provide a set of recommended practices for using Our Voice as a method to evaluate and promote equity of access and use of metropolitan parks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult Sports Participation and Physical Activity: How About Curling? Black Girls as Transformative Leaders in Physical Activity Programs. Brownfields to Healthfields: A Retrospective Ripple Effect Mapping Evaluation in Three Rural Communities. Complete Highway Removal vs. Highway Removal to Boulevards vs. Caps: Redressing Past Wrongs while Addressing the Decay of America's Most Ambitious Public Works Project. Developing translational products for adapting evidence-based physical activity interventions in rural communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1