Yinghe Chen , Jianguang Wei , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Xiaofeng Zhou , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Xiaoqing Zhao , Abdumalik Gayubov , Jiangtao Li , Anlun Wang , Ying Yang , Xuedong Shi
{"title":"环境压力和储层压力下不同驱替剂在致密砂岩中自吸采油机理的实验研究","authors":"Yinghe Chen , Jianguang Wei , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Xiaofeng Zhou , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Xiaoqing Zhao , Abdumalik Gayubov , Jiangtao Li , Anlun Wang , Ying Yang , Xuedong Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study explores oil recovery mechanisms of static imbibition<span> in a tight sandstone under different imbibition pressures, simultaneously optimizing imbibition agents. To this end, the static imbibition experiments of two common agents, polyacrylamide (PAM) slick water and anion–nonionic surfactants, are conducted under atmospheric and reservoir pressure (20 MPa). The interfacial tension and contact angle of these two imbibition fluids are also measured. Herein, the entire recovery period and imbibition equilibrium time vs. pressure are determined. Based on NMR and high-pressure mercury injection measurements, the contributions of pores with different sizes to the displacement recovery during imbibition are quantified. Under atmospheric pressure, the recovery rate with the surfactant was measured higher than that of the PAM slick water. The main reason was that the former has a lower interfacial tension (0.0961 mN/m), stronger </span></span>hydrophilicity<span> (average contact angle 27.7°), and stronger oil-displacing effect. Under a reservoir pressure of 20 MPa, the surfactant had lower recovery rate than the PAM slick water, while the latter enhanced the recovery further. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents recovered the crude oil in the medium-sized and larger pores whereas, under reservoir pressure (20 MPa), they mainly recovered oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores. At higher imbibition pressures, both agents recovered more oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores, and less from micropores and larger pores. This indicated that higher pressures can further improve the driving force of fluid replacement, to improve oil production from finer and medium-sized pores significantly. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents reached imbibition equilibrium in approximately 20 days while this period was reduced for the surfactant and slick water to 16 and 12 days, respectively. Based on the results PAM slick water is recommended for EOR purposes in tight sandstone which can be generalized to similar formations around the globe.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of oil recovery mechanisms during imbibition in tight sandstone with different fluid displacing agents under ambient and reservoir pressure\",\"authors\":\"Yinghe Chen , Jianguang Wei , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Xiaofeng Zhou , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Xiaoqing Zhao , Abdumalik Gayubov , Jiangtao Li , Anlun Wang , Ying Yang , Xuedong Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This study explores oil recovery mechanisms of static imbibition<span> in a tight sandstone under different imbibition pressures, simultaneously optimizing imbibition agents. To this end, the static imbibition experiments of two common agents, polyacrylamide (PAM) slick water and anion–nonionic surfactants, are conducted under atmospheric and reservoir pressure (20 MPa). The interfacial tension and contact angle of these two imbibition fluids are also measured. Herein, the entire recovery period and imbibition equilibrium time vs. pressure are determined. Based on NMR and high-pressure mercury injection measurements, the contributions of pores with different sizes to the displacement recovery during imbibition are quantified. Under atmospheric pressure, the recovery rate with the surfactant was measured higher than that of the PAM slick water. The main reason was that the former has a lower interfacial tension (0.0961 mN/m), stronger </span></span>hydrophilicity<span> (average contact angle 27.7°), and stronger oil-displacing effect. Under a reservoir pressure of 20 MPa, the surfactant had lower recovery rate than the PAM slick water, while the latter enhanced the recovery further. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents recovered the crude oil in the medium-sized and larger pores whereas, under reservoir pressure (20 MPa), they mainly recovered oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores. At higher imbibition pressures, both agents recovered more oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores, and less from micropores and larger pores. This indicated that higher pressures can further improve the driving force of fluid replacement, to improve oil production from finer and medium-sized pores significantly. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents reached imbibition equilibrium in approximately 20 days while this period was reduced for the surfactant and slick water to 16 and 12 days, respectively. Based on the results PAM slick water is recommended for EOR purposes in tight sandstone which can be generalized to similar formations around the globe.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522010336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522010336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental study of oil recovery mechanisms during imbibition in tight sandstone with different fluid displacing agents under ambient and reservoir pressure
This study explores oil recovery mechanisms of static imbibition in a tight sandstone under different imbibition pressures, simultaneously optimizing imbibition agents. To this end, the static imbibition experiments of two common agents, polyacrylamide (PAM) slick water and anion–nonionic surfactants, are conducted under atmospheric and reservoir pressure (20 MPa). The interfacial tension and contact angle of these two imbibition fluids are also measured. Herein, the entire recovery period and imbibition equilibrium time vs. pressure are determined. Based on NMR and high-pressure mercury injection measurements, the contributions of pores with different sizes to the displacement recovery during imbibition are quantified. Under atmospheric pressure, the recovery rate with the surfactant was measured higher than that of the PAM slick water. The main reason was that the former has a lower interfacial tension (0.0961 mN/m), stronger hydrophilicity (average contact angle 27.7°), and stronger oil-displacing effect. Under a reservoir pressure of 20 MPa, the surfactant had lower recovery rate than the PAM slick water, while the latter enhanced the recovery further. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents recovered the crude oil in the medium-sized and larger pores whereas, under reservoir pressure (20 MPa), they mainly recovered oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores. At higher imbibition pressures, both agents recovered more oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores, and less from micropores and larger pores. This indicated that higher pressures can further improve the driving force of fluid replacement, to improve oil production from finer and medium-sized pores significantly. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents reached imbibition equilibrium in approximately 20 days while this period was reduced for the surfactant and slick water to 16 and 12 days, respectively. Based on the results PAM slick water is recommended for EOR purposes in tight sandstone which can be generalized to similar formations around the globe.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership.
The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.