资金化资本化养老金设计与最低养老金保障需求

Q3 Social Sciences Public and Municipal Finance Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.21511/PMF.10(1).2021.02
Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río
{"title":"资金化资本化养老金设计与最低养老金保障需求","authors":"Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río","doi":"10.21511/PMF.10(1).2021.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using funded and unfunded pillars, the optimal pension structure is estimated using an over-lapping generation model, calibrated to the average OECD countries. While simulating different pillar sizes, a socio-economic characteristic was revealed in which low-earning groups are prone to unexpected market risks than high-earning cohorts and support a larger contribution than better-off individuals. This led to high contribution rates for funded pillars and low contributions rates for social security pillars. This suboptimal allocation leads to inefficient hedging capability for the pension portfolio. An alternative is a minimum pension guarantee as an efficient system stabilizer as it rebalances the economic cost among different earning cohorts. However, the guarantee might be expensive to implement if not capitalized early in the working phases in an era of aging populations, low birth rates, and deep financial crisis.","PeriodicalId":52837,"journal":{"name":"Public and Municipal Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funded-capitalized pension designs and the demand for minimum pension guarantee\",\"authors\":\"Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/PMF.10(1).2021.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using funded and unfunded pillars, the optimal pension structure is estimated using an over-lapping generation model, calibrated to the average OECD countries. While simulating different pillar sizes, a socio-economic characteristic was revealed in which low-earning groups are prone to unexpected market risks than high-earning cohorts and support a larger contribution than better-off individuals. This led to high contribution rates for funded pillars and low contributions rates for social security pillars. This suboptimal allocation leads to inefficient hedging capability for the pension portfolio. An alternative is a minimum pension guarantee as an efficient system stabilizer as it rebalances the economic cost among different earning cohorts. However, the guarantee might be expensive to implement if not capitalized early in the working phases in an era of aging populations, low birth rates, and deep financial crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public and Municipal Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public and Municipal Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/PMF.10(1).2021.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public and Municipal Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/PMF.10(1).2021.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

使用有资金和无资金支柱,使用重叠世代模型估计最佳养老金结构,该模型根据经合组织国家的平均水平进行校准。在模拟不同支柱规模的同时,揭示了一个社会经济特征,即低收入群体比高收入群体更容易出现意外的市场风险,并比富裕个人支持更大的贡献。这导致供资支柱的缴款率高,而社会保障支柱的缴款比率低。这种次优配置导致养老金投资组合的套期保值能力效率低下。另一种选择是最低养老金保障,作为一种有效的系统稳定器,在不同收入群体之间重新平衡经济成本。然而,在人口老龄化、低出生率和严重金融危机的时代,如果不在工作阶段尽早投入资金,这项保障的实施成本可能很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Funded-capitalized pension designs and the demand for minimum pension guarantee
Using funded and unfunded pillars, the optimal pension structure is estimated using an over-lapping generation model, calibrated to the average OECD countries. While simulating different pillar sizes, a socio-economic characteristic was revealed in which low-earning groups are prone to unexpected market risks than high-earning cohorts and support a larger contribution than better-off individuals. This led to high contribution rates for funded pillars and low contributions rates for social security pillars. This suboptimal allocation leads to inefficient hedging capability for the pension portfolio. An alternative is a minimum pension guarantee as an efficient system stabilizer as it rebalances the economic cost among different earning cohorts. However, the guarantee might be expensive to implement if not capitalized early in the working phases in an era of aging populations, low birth rates, and deep financial crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public and Municipal Finance
Public and Municipal Finance Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Financial security of Ukraine under martial law: Impact of macroeconomic determinants The complexity of tax regulations and principles of justice as determinants of taxpayer compliance: case of Indonesia The impact of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and organizational commitment on whistleblowing intention: A moderating role of local culture Enhancing administrative service delivery practices of local government: Experiences from Nepal Macroeconomic factors and government bond yield in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1