重塑幸福:新西兰奥特亚应对2019冠状病毒病第一波疫情的经验教训

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Asia Pacific Viewpoint Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.1111/apv.12369
Dean C. Stronge, Alison Greenaway, Robyn L. Kannemeyer, Chris Howard
{"title":"重塑幸福:新西兰奥特亚应对2019冠状病毒病第一波疫情的经验教训","authors":"Dean C. Stronge,&nbsp;Alison Greenaway,&nbsp;Robyn L. Kannemeyer,&nbsp;Chris Howard","doi":"10.1111/apv.12369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Well-being is increasingly being promoted and used to describe social progress. However, tension exists between framings that focus on enhancing individual well-being (living well) and societal or collective framings of well-being (living well together). Well-being is central to Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 response and recovery. The COVID-19 pandemic reopened debates about what kind of society people want to live in. Our research explored the ‘shared typical’ or commonality of experiences of the first wave of COVID-19 response in Aotearoa New Zealand. Semi-structured interviews provided insights into a wide range of concerns participants faced and what that meant for their well-being and the well-being of Aotearoa New Zealand. We found that well-being is both multidimensional and hierarchical, and while people talked about their own well-being, it was often in the context of broader social well-being. These findings support research showing that well-being is relational. We suggest that Indigenous models of well-being are well placed to inform policy strategies enabling holistic well-being, but this needs to be done in ways that pair Indigenous and Western knowledge, rather than integrating or assimilating this knowledge into Western science approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":46928,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","volume":"64 2","pages":"239-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apv.12369","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reframing well-being: Lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand's first wave COVID-19 response\",\"authors\":\"Dean C. Stronge,&nbsp;Alison Greenaway,&nbsp;Robyn L. Kannemeyer,&nbsp;Chris Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apv.12369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Well-being is increasingly being promoted and used to describe social progress. However, tension exists between framings that focus on enhancing individual well-being (living well) and societal or collective framings of well-being (living well together). Well-being is central to Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 response and recovery. The COVID-19 pandemic reopened debates about what kind of society people want to live in. Our research explored the ‘shared typical’ or commonality of experiences of the first wave of COVID-19 response in Aotearoa New Zealand. Semi-structured interviews provided insights into a wide range of concerns participants faced and what that meant for their well-being and the well-being of Aotearoa New Zealand. We found that well-being is both multidimensional and hierarchical, and while people talked about their own well-being, it was often in the context of broader social well-being. These findings support research showing that well-being is relational. We suggest that Indigenous models of well-being are well placed to inform policy strategies enabling holistic well-being, but this needs to be done in ways that pair Indigenous and Western knowledge, rather than integrating or assimilating this knowledge into Western science approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Viewpoint\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"239-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apv.12369\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Viewpoint\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apv.12369\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apv.12369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

幸福越来越多地被用来描述社会进步。然而,专注于提高个人福祉(生活得好)和社会或集体福祉(共同生活得好)的框架之间存在紧张关系。福祉是新西兰应对和恢复COVID-19的核心。2019冠状病毒病大流行重新开启了人们希望生活在什么样的社会中的辩论。我们的研究探讨了新西兰奥特罗阿第一波COVID-19应对经历的“共同典型”或共性。半结构化访谈提供了参与者所面临的广泛关注的见解,以及这对他们的福祉和新西兰奥特罗阿的福祉意味着什么。我们发现幸福是多维的,也是有层次的,当人们谈论自己的幸福时,往往是在更广泛的社会幸福的背景下。这些发现支持了幸福感是相关的研究。我们认为,土著幸福模型可以很好地为实现整体福祉的政策策略提供信息,但这需要以土著和西方知识相结合的方式完成,而不是将这些知识整合或同化到西方科学方法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reframing well-being: Lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand's first wave COVID-19 response

Well-being is increasingly being promoted and used to describe social progress. However, tension exists between framings that focus on enhancing individual well-being (living well) and societal or collective framings of well-being (living well together). Well-being is central to Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 response and recovery. The COVID-19 pandemic reopened debates about what kind of society people want to live in. Our research explored the ‘shared typical’ or commonality of experiences of the first wave of COVID-19 response in Aotearoa New Zealand. Semi-structured interviews provided insights into a wide range of concerns participants faced and what that meant for their well-being and the well-being of Aotearoa New Zealand. We found that well-being is both multidimensional and hierarchical, and while people talked about their own well-being, it was often in the context of broader social well-being. These findings support research showing that well-being is relational. We suggest that Indigenous models of well-being are well placed to inform policy strategies enabling holistic well-being, but this needs to be done in ways that pair Indigenous and Western knowledge, rather than integrating or assimilating this knowledge into Western science approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Viewpoint is a journal of international scope, particularly in the fields of geography and its allied disciplines. Reporting on research in East and South East Asia, as well as the Pacific region, coverage includes: - the growth of linkages between countries within the Asia Pacific region, including international investment, migration, and political and economic co-operation - the environmental consequences of agriculture, industrial and service growth, and resource developments within the region - first-hand field work into rural, industrial, and urban developments that are relevant to the wider Pacific, East and South East Asia.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Macaology: A construct of a socio-psychological self-essentialist view of the world A heterotopic reading of heritage: The Village of Our Lady in Ka Ho, Macau A backlash against the high-speed modernity of gastronomy tourism: An analysis of the evolution of Macanese cuisine Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1