布纳肯国家公园权属冲突分析(以曼特哈格岛为例)

Ronald Aneng, R. Barkey, M. Salam
{"title":"布纳肯国家公园权属冲突分析(以曼特哈格岛为例)","authors":"Ronald Aneng, R. Barkey, M. Salam","doi":"10.20886/jwas.v8i1.6175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bunaken National Park was designation based on the Decree of the Minister of Forestry Number: SK. 734 / Menhut-II / 2014. Boundary demarcation process of Bunaken National Park in Mantehage Island was rejected by the community due to land claims in the form of gardens and settlements. This study puposes to answer how the state of land cover and use of the Mantehage Island and how the tenurial conflicts. The analysis used is spatial analysis and Rapid Land Tenure Assessment (RaTA). The results indicate that land cover and use consisted of primary mangrove forests, dry land agriculture, mixed gardens, scrub, settlements and roads. Conflict occurred between the community and the Forest Area Boundary Committee for North Minahasa Regency because the community did not understand the boundary demarcation activitiess and regulations that could provide a solution to their land conflict problems. Conflict resolution mechanisms that can be taken is the settlement of third-party rights in boundary demarcation process, review of spatial planning and conservation partnerships.","PeriodicalId":31303,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Wasian","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Tenurial Conflict of the Bunaken National Park (A Case Study of Mantehage Island)\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Aneng, R. Barkey, M. Salam\",\"doi\":\"10.20886/jwas.v8i1.6175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bunaken National Park was designation based on the Decree of the Minister of Forestry Number: SK. 734 / Menhut-II / 2014. Boundary demarcation process of Bunaken National Park in Mantehage Island was rejected by the community due to land claims in the form of gardens and settlements. This study puposes to answer how the state of land cover and use of the Mantehage Island and how the tenurial conflicts. The analysis used is spatial analysis and Rapid Land Tenure Assessment (RaTA). The results indicate that land cover and use consisted of primary mangrove forests, dry land agriculture, mixed gardens, scrub, settlements and roads. Conflict occurred between the community and the Forest Area Boundary Committee for North Minahasa Regency because the community did not understand the boundary demarcation activitiess and regulations that could provide a solution to their land conflict problems. Conflict resolution mechanisms that can be taken is the settlement of third-party rights in boundary demarcation process, review of spatial planning and conservation partnerships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Wasian\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Wasian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20886/jwas.v8i1.6175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Wasian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20886/jwas.v8i1.6175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布纳肯国家公园是根据林业部长的法令指定的,编号:SK.734/Menhut II/2014。Mantehage岛Bunaken国家公园的划界程序因花园和定居点形式的土地要求而被社区拒绝。本研究旨在回答Mantehage岛的土地覆盖和使用状况以及土地使用权如何冲突。所使用的分析是空间分析和快速土地保有权评估(RaTA)。结果表明,土地覆盖和利用包括原始红树林、旱地农业、混合花园、灌木丛、定居点和道路。该社区与北米纳哈萨县林区边界委员会之间发生冲突,因为该社区不了解能够解决其土地冲突问题的划界活动和法规。可以采取的冲突解决机制是解决划界过程中的第三方权利、审查空间规划和保护伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Tenurial Conflict of the Bunaken National Park (A Case Study of Mantehage Island)
Bunaken National Park was designation based on the Decree of the Minister of Forestry Number: SK. 734 / Menhut-II / 2014. Boundary demarcation process of Bunaken National Park in Mantehage Island was rejected by the community due to land claims in the form of gardens and settlements. This study puposes to answer how the state of land cover and use of the Mantehage Island and how the tenurial conflicts. The analysis used is spatial analysis and Rapid Land Tenure Assessment (RaTA). The results indicate that land cover and use consisted of primary mangrove forests, dry land agriculture, mixed gardens, scrub, settlements and roads. Conflict occurred between the community and the Forest Area Boundary Committee for North Minahasa Regency because the community did not understand the boundary demarcation activitiess and regulations that could provide a solution to their land conflict problems. Conflict resolution mechanisms that can be taken is the settlement of third-party rights in boundary demarcation process, review of spatial planning and conservation partnerships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identification of the Effectiveness of Land Cover in Some Areas in Borisallo Village for Conservation Measures EFFECT OF COMPOST DOSING ON THE GROWTH OF NYATOH (Palaquium sp) SEEDLINGS IN THE NURSERY Forest and Land Rehabilitation Planning Based on Land Capacity of The Lake Tondano Catchment Area Perencanaan Rehabilitasi Hutan Dan Lahan (Rhl) Berbasis Kemampuan Lahan Di Daerah Tangkapan Air (Dta) Danau Tondano Analisis Konflik Tenurial di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (KPHP) Model Poigar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1