教育扩张、社会阶层与选择拉丁语作为差异化策略

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2021-11-26 DOI:10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0021
J. Gerhards, U. Kohler, Tim Sawert
{"title":"教育扩张、社会阶层与选择拉丁语作为差异化策略","authors":"J. Gerhards, U. Kohler, Tim Sawert","doi":"10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In times of educational expansion, privileged families are looking for new strategies of distinction. Referring to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of distinction, we argue that choosing Latin at school – a language that is no longer spoken and therefore has no direct value – is one of the strategies of privileged families to set themselves apart from less privileged families. Based on two surveys we conducted at German schools, the paper analyzes the relationship between parents’ educational background and the probability that their child will learn Latin. Results indicate that historically academic families have the strongest tendency towards learning Latin, followed by new academic families, and leaving behind the non-academic families. We distinguish between four causal mechanisms that might help to explain these associations: cultural distinction, selecting a socially exclusive learning environment, beliefs in a secondary instrumental function of learning Latin, and spatial proximity between the location of humanist Gymnasiums and the residential areas of privileged families. The hypotheses are formalized by means of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG). Findings show that the decision to learn Latin is predominately an unintended consequence of the selection of a socially exclusive learning environment. In addition, there is evidence that especially children from historically academic families learn Latin as a strategy of cultural distinction.","PeriodicalId":47292,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie","volume":"50 1","pages":"306 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Expansion, Social Class, and Choosing Latin as a Strategy of Distinction\",\"authors\":\"J. Gerhards, U. Kohler, Tim Sawert\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In times of educational expansion, privileged families are looking for new strategies of distinction. Referring to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of distinction, we argue that choosing Latin at school – a language that is no longer spoken and therefore has no direct value – is one of the strategies of privileged families to set themselves apart from less privileged families. Based on two surveys we conducted at German schools, the paper analyzes the relationship between parents’ educational background and the probability that their child will learn Latin. Results indicate that historically academic families have the strongest tendency towards learning Latin, followed by new academic families, and leaving behind the non-academic families. We distinguish between four causal mechanisms that might help to explain these associations: cultural distinction, selecting a socially exclusive learning environment, beliefs in a secondary instrumental function of learning Latin, and spatial proximity between the location of humanist Gymnasiums and the residential areas of privileged families. The hypotheses are formalized by means of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG). Findings show that the decision to learn Latin is predominately an unintended consequence of the selection of a socially exclusive learning environment. In addition, there is evidence that especially children from historically academic families learn Latin as a strategy of cultural distinction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"306 - 321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在教育扩张的时代,特权家庭正在寻求新的差异化策略。参考皮埃尔·布迪厄的区别理论,我们认为在学校选择拉丁语——一种不再被使用的语言,因此没有直接价值——是特权家庭将自己与不那么特权的家庭区分开来的策略之一。基于我们在德国学校进行的两次调查,本文分析了父母的教育背景与孩子学习拉丁语的概率之间的关系。结果表明,历史学术家庭学习拉丁语的倾向最强,其次是新学术家庭,而非学术家庭则落后。我们区分了四种可能有助于解释这些关联的因果机制:文化差异,选择社会排他性的学习环境,对学习拉丁语的次要工具功能的信念,以及人文主义体育馆与特权家庭住宅区之间的空间邻近性。用有向无环图(DAG)形式化了这些假设。研究结果表明,学习拉丁语的决定主要是选择社会排他性学习环境的意外后果。此外,有证据表明,特别是来自历史上学院派家庭的孩子,学习拉丁语是一种文化差异的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Educational Expansion, Social Class, and Choosing Latin as a Strategy of Distinction
Abstract In times of educational expansion, privileged families are looking for new strategies of distinction. Referring to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of distinction, we argue that choosing Latin at school – a language that is no longer spoken and therefore has no direct value – is one of the strategies of privileged families to set themselves apart from less privileged families. Based on two surveys we conducted at German schools, the paper analyzes the relationship between parents’ educational background and the probability that their child will learn Latin. Results indicate that historically academic families have the strongest tendency towards learning Latin, followed by new academic families, and leaving behind the non-academic families. We distinguish between four causal mechanisms that might help to explain these associations: cultural distinction, selecting a socially exclusive learning environment, beliefs in a secondary instrumental function of learning Latin, and spatial proximity between the location of humanist Gymnasiums and the residential areas of privileged families. The hypotheses are formalized by means of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG). Findings show that the decision to learn Latin is predominately an unintended consequence of the selection of a socially exclusive learning environment. In addition, there is evidence that especially children from historically academic families learn Latin as a strategy of cultural distinction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Soziologie veröffentlicht Beiträge aus allen Bereichen der Soziologie. Sie erscheint sechs Mal im Jahr und veröffentlicht pro Heft in der Regel vier Forschungsartikel, bisweilen aber auch kürzere Forschungsnotizen und soziologische Essays. In unserem Online-Heftarchiv, das sich zur Zeit im Aufbau befindet, erhalten unsere Online-Abonnenten Zugriff auf alle Inhalte der Zeitschrift für Soziologie. Der Zugriff auf Artikel, deren Veröffentlichungsdatum mindestens zwei Jahre zurückliegt, ist allen Nutzern gestattet. Von unseren aktuellen Heften ist jeweils ein Artikel pro Heft vom Tage des Erscheinens an frei zugänglich.
期刊最新文献
Effizienz und soziale Ungleichheit in strikt leistungsdifferenzierenden Bildungssystemen. Eine kritische Betrachtung des Model of Ability Tracking (MoAbiT) Die Zukunft sozialer Rechte Multiple Differenzierung und Wandel. Der Beitrag der evolutionär-institutionalistischen Perspektive Distinct Boundaries? Preferences of Immigrants’ Descendants Regarding Partnerships with Recent Refugees from Syria and Afghanistan in Germany Assessing the Importance of Sample Choice and Selectivity for Sex Segregation in College Majors: A Replication of Ochsenfeld (2016)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1