纤维瘤和子宫内膜异位症患者的主观疾病理论:相似性、差异性和影响因素

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders Pub Date : 2022-03-13 DOI:10.1177/22840265211073017
Friederike Münch, A. Ebert, S. Mechsner, R. Richter, M. David
{"title":"纤维瘤和子宫内膜异位症患者的主观疾病理论:相似性、差异性和影响因素","authors":"Friederike Münch, A. Ebert, S. Mechsner, R. Richter, M. David","doi":"10.1177/22840265211073017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the subjective theories of illness in patients with fibroids and patients with endometriosis, and to identify potential factors influencing them. Methodology: Participating patients were recruited via three specialized centers for fibroids and endometriosis. To assess their subjective theories concerning the cause of their illness, we used a questionnaire based on the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R). We also gathered and evaluated data relating to sociodemographic factors and psychological distress or possible anxieties using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7). Results: We were able to analyze data from 201 patients with fibroids and 212 patients with endometriosis. About 94.4% of the patients had one or more subjective theories concerning the cause of their illness. Both groups perceived “stress or worry” to be the most probable cause of their illness. Compared to endometriosis patients, patients with fibroids were more likely to assume “aging” and “heredity” as the cause of their illness. Endometriosis patients, on the other hand, were more likely to choose theories pertaining to the “environmental influences and immune system” category. The patients’ age, formal education, and conspicuous score values in the K10 or GAD-7 questionnaire proved to be important factors influencing their beliefs about the cause of illness. Conclusion: Patients perceive stress and psychological strain as possible causes for their illness. It might be beneficial to take this information into account in conversations between doctors and patients and when drawing up psychosomatic-gynecological treatment plans.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"14 1","pages":"71 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective theories of illness in fibroid and endometriosis patients: Similarities, differences, and influencing factors\",\"authors\":\"Friederike Münch, A. Ebert, S. Mechsner, R. Richter, M. David\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22840265211073017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the subjective theories of illness in patients with fibroids and patients with endometriosis, and to identify potential factors influencing them. Methodology: Participating patients were recruited via three specialized centers for fibroids and endometriosis. To assess their subjective theories concerning the cause of their illness, we used a questionnaire based on the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R). We also gathered and evaluated data relating to sociodemographic factors and psychological distress or possible anxieties using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7). Results: We were able to analyze data from 201 patients with fibroids and 212 patients with endometriosis. About 94.4% of the patients had one or more subjective theories concerning the cause of their illness. Both groups perceived “stress or worry” to be the most probable cause of their illness. Compared to endometriosis patients, patients with fibroids were more likely to assume “aging” and “heredity” as the cause of their illness. Endometriosis patients, on the other hand, were more likely to choose theories pertaining to the “environmental influences and immune system” category. The patients’ age, formal education, and conspicuous score values in the K10 or GAD-7 questionnaire proved to be important factors influencing their beliefs about the cause of illness. Conclusion: Patients perceive stress and psychological strain as possible causes for their illness. It might be beneficial to take this information into account in conversations between doctors and patients and when drawing up psychosomatic-gynecological treatment plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265211073017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265211073017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言:本研究的目的是比较子宫肌瘤患者和子宫内膜异位症患者的主观疾病理论,并确定影响它们的潜在因素。方法:参与的患者通过三个专门的子宫肌瘤和子宫内膜异位症中心招募。为了评估他们关于疾病原因的主观理论,我们使用了一份基于修订后的疾病感知问卷(IPQ-R)的问卷。我们还使用凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K10)和广泛焦虑症评估(GAD-7)收集和评估了与社会人口统计学因素和心理困扰或可能的焦虑有关的数据。结果:我们能够分析201例纤维瘤患者和212例子宫内膜异位症患者的数据。约94.4%的患者对其病因有一种或多种主观理论。两组人都认为“压力或担忧”是他们患病的最可能原因。与子宫内膜异位症患者相比,子宫肌瘤患者更有可能认为“衰老”和“遗传”是他们患病的原因。另一方面,子宫内膜异位症患者更有可能选择与“环境影响和免疫系统”类别相关的理论。患者的年龄、正规教育程度和K10或GAD-7问卷中的显著得分值被证明是影响他们对病因信念的重要因素。结论:患者认为压力和心理紧张可能是其患病的原因。在医生和患者之间的对话以及制定身心妇科治疗计划时,将这些信息考虑在内可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subjective theories of illness in fibroid and endometriosis patients: Similarities, differences, and influencing factors
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the subjective theories of illness in patients with fibroids and patients with endometriosis, and to identify potential factors influencing them. Methodology: Participating patients were recruited via three specialized centers for fibroids and endometriosis. To assess their subjective theories concerning the cause of their illness, we used a questionnaire based on the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R). We also gathered and evaluated data relating to sociodemographic factors and psychological distress or possible anxieties using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7). Results: We were able to analyze data from 201 patients with fibroids and 212 patients with endometriosis. About 94.4% of the patients had one or more subjective theories concerning the cause of their illness. Both groups perceived “stress or worry” to be the most probable cause of their illness. Compared to endometriosis patients, patients with fibroids were more likely to assume “aging” and “heredity” as the cause of their illness. Endometriosis patients, on the other hand, were more likely to choose theories pertaining to the “environmental influences and immune system” category. The patients’ age, formal education, and conspicuous score values in the K10 or GAD-7 questionnaire proved to be important factors influencing their beliefs about the cause of illness. Conclusion: Patients perceive stress and psychological strain as possible causes for their illness. It might be beneficial to take this information into account in conversations between doctors and patients and when drawing up psychosomatic-gynecological treatment plans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals When cystoscopy catches what laparoscopy misses: The role of cystoscopy in evaluation of bladder endometriosis Comprehensive management of umbilical endometriosis using a unique laparoscopic entry portal (Darwish point) and postoperative Dienogest Chronic pelvic pain: An underrecognised perioperative consideration The Holy Grail of endometriosis biomarkers in the diagnostic process – How much would it be worth and what does it look like?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1