威廉·史密斯,《赫里福德的使用:中世纪英国教区仪式的来源》。法纳姆:阿什盖特,2015年。xxxi+830页。150英镑为978 1 4724 1277 5英镑。

IF 0.5 1区 艺术学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Plainsong & Medieval Music Pub Date : 2017-03-20 DOI:10.1017/S0961137116000127
M. Salisbury
{"title":"威廉·史密斯,《赫里福德的使用:中世纪英国教区仪式的来源》。法纳姆:阿什盖特,2015年。xxxi+830页。150英镑为978 1 4724 1277 5英镑。","authors":"M. Salisbury","doi":"10.1017/S0961137116000127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"about Hildegard of Bingen. Arguably, this chapter encapsulates the volume’s most immediate implications for scholarship beyond the circumscribed study of Hildegard reception, since it crystallises succinctly the differences between the two revivals: while the French resurgence of interest in chant was instigated from a religious vantage point, German scholars were interested primarily in the musical aspects of chant. The monks at Solesmes took as their yardstick the medieval sources of Gregorian chant while Germans such as Franz Xaver Haberl were guided by humanist reworkings, most prominently the Medicean Graduale of 1614. Readers with a general interest in the politics of nineteenth-century chant revivals may be tempted to put down Bain’s book before they reach chapter 3; scholars with an interest in Hildegard, in turn, might be tempted to skip it. However, the chapter is worth close attention and is likely to encourage further, in-depth studies of the nineteenth-century reception of medieval music. Perhaps Bain would have been better served by placing this chapter earlier on in her study, for it undergirds much of her presentation of Hildegard-specific reception and it would be a pity for its insights to go unnoticed. This minor quibble aside, Bain’s study achieves its aim with admirable clarity: it demonstrates with flair that the revival of Hildegard and her music was not instigated in the twentieth century, but is rooted in the nineteenth century. Into the bargain, Bain offers readers rich insight into the cultural milieux in which such processes of reception and revival took place, encouraging further investigation.","PeriodicalId":41539,"journal":{"name":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137116000127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William Smith, The Use of Hereford: The Sources of a Medieval English Diocesan Rite. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. xxxi + 830pp. £150. ISBN 978 1 4724 1277 5.\",\"authors\":\"M. Salisbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0961137116000127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"about Hildegard of Bingen. Arguably, this chapter encapsulates the volume’s most immediate implications for scholarship beyond the circumscribed study of Hildegard reception, since it crystallises succinctly the differences between the two revivals: while the French resurgence of interest in chant was instigated from a religious vantage point, German scholars were interested primarily in the musical aspects of chant. The monks at Solesmes took as their yardstick the medieval sources of Gregorian chant while Germans such as Franz Xaver Haberl were guided by humanist reworkings, most prominently the Medicean Graduale of 1614. Readers with a general interest in the politics of nineteenth-century chant revivals may be tempted to put down Bain’s book before they reach chapter 3; scholars with an interest in Hildegard, in turn, might be tempted to skip it. However, the chapter is worth close attention and is likely to encourage further, in-depth studies of the nineteenth-century reception of medieval music. Perhaps Bain would have been better served by placing this chapter earlier on in her study, for it undergirds much of her presentation of Hildegard-specific reception and it would be a pity for its insights to go unnoticed. This minor quibble aside, Bain’s study achieves its aim with admirable clarity: it demonstrates with flair that the revival of Hildegard and her music was not instigated in the twentieth century, but is rooted in the nineteenth century. Into the bargain, Bain offers readers rich insight into the cultural milieux in which such processes of reception and revival took place, encouraging further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plainsong & Medieval Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137116000127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plainsong & Medieval Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137116000127\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137116000127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于宾根的希尔德加德。可以说,这一章概括了该卷对学术界最直接的影响,超越了对希尔德加德接受的限制性研究,因为它简洁地体现了两次复兴之间的差异:虽然法国人对圣歌兴趣的复兴是从宗教的角度出发的,但德国学者主要对圣歌的音乐方面感兴趣。Solesmes的僧侣们以中世纪格里高利圣歌的来源为标准,而Franz Xaver Haberl等德国人则以人文主义的重新创作为指导,最突出的是1614年的Medicean Graduale。对19世纪圣歌复兴的政治普遍感兴趣的读者可能会在读到第三章之前,忍不住放下贝恩的书;反过来,对希尔德加德感兴趣的学者可能会跳过这一章。然而,这一章值得密切关注,可能会鼓励对19世纪中世纪音乐的接受进行进一步深入的研究。也许贝恩在她的研究中早点放上这一章会更好,因为这一章在很大程度上支持了她对希尔德加德特定接待的介绍,如果它的见解被忽视,那将是一种遗憾。撇开这一次要的狡辩不谈,贝恩的研究以令人钦佩的清晰度达到了目的:它天才地表明,希尔德加德和她的音乐的复兴不是在20世纪发起的,而是植根于19世纪。在交易中,贝恩为读者提供了对这种接受和复兴过程发生的文化环境的丰富见解,鼓励进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
William Smith, The Use of Hereford: The Sources of a Medieval English Diocesan Rite. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. xxxi + 830pp. £150. ISBN 978 1 4724 1277 5.
about Hildegard of Bingen. Arguably, this chapter encapsulates the volume’s most immediate implications for scholarship beyond the circumscribed study of Hildegard reception, since it crystallises succinctly the differences between the two revivals: while the French resurgence of interest in chant was instigated from a religious vantage point, German scholars were interested primarily in the musical aspects of chant. The monks at Solesmes took as their yardstick the medieval sources of Gregorian chant while Germans such as Franz Xaver Haberl were guided by humanist reworkings, most prominently the Medicean Graduale of 1614. Readers with a general interest in the politics of nineteenth-century chant revivals may be tempted to put down Bain’s book before they reach chapter 3; scholars with an interest in Hildegard, in turn, might be tempted to skip it. However, the chapter is worth close attention and is likely to encourage further, in-depth studies of the nineteenth-century reception of medieval music. Perhaps Bain would have been better served by placing this chapter earlier on in her study, for it undergirds much of her presentation of Hildegard-specific reception and it would be a pity for its insights to go unnoticed. This minor quibble aside, Bain’s study achieves its aim with admirable clarity: it demonstrates with flair that the revival of Hildegard and her music was not instigated in the twentieth century, but is rooted in the nineteenth century. Into the bargain, Bain offers readers rich insight into the cultural milieux in which such processes of reception and revival took place, encouraging further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Plainsong & Medieval Music is published twice a year in association with the Plainsong and Medieval Music Society and Cantus Planus, study group of the International Musicological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of medieval music: Eastern and Western chant, secular lyric, music theory, palaeography, performance practice, and medieval polyphony, both sacred and secular, as well as the history of musical institutions. The chronological scope of the journal extends from late antiquity to the early Renaissance and to the present day in the case of chant. In addition to book reviews in each issue, a comprehensive bibliography of chant research and a discography of recent and re-issued plainchant recordings appear annually.
期刊最新文献
Ornamental melismas in Aquitanian introits PMM volume 32 issue 1 Cover and Back matter Preacher and prophet: intersecting voices of St John the Evangelist in late medieval ‘s-Hertogenbosch Commemorating the Virgin Mary at Barking Abbey: Cambridge, University Library, Dd.12.56 PMM volume 32 issue 1 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1