通过双季稻种植系统中猪粪和减少无机肥施用的组合减少温室气体净排放:三年成果

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107799
Cong Wang , Xiaofang Ma , Jianlin Shen , Dan Chen , Liang Zheng , Tida Ge , Yong Li , Jinshui Wu
{"title":"通过双季稻种植系统中猪粪和减少无机肥施用的组合减少温室气体净排放:三年成果","authors":"Cong Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Ma ,&nbsp;Jianlin Shen ,&nbsp;Dan Chen ,&nbsp;Liang Zheng ,&nbsp;Tida Ge ,&nbsp;Yong Li ,&nbsp;Jinshui Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2021.107799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Manure amendment in croplands is common practice for soil carbon sequestration, and may also reduce </span>greenhouse gas emissions<span>. Few studies focus on the effects of manure application on the net greenhouse gas emissions (NGHGE, the global warming impacts of soil carbon sequestration and CH</span></span><sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub><span>O emissions) in double-rice cropping fields. Herein, a field experiment was conducted to analyze the effects of pig manure<span><span><span> application in combination with reduced chemical fertilizers on the NGHGE, </span>soil properties, and yields in a double-rice </span>paddy field<span> in 2012–2015. Four treatments were included: 0 N (no nitrogen fertilizer); 1/2 N (chemical nitrogen fertilizer reduced by 50%); N (100% chemical nitrogen fertilizer); and 1/2 N + PM (pig manure complemented with chemical fertilizer application). The average annual CH</span></span></span><sub>4</sub> emissions for 1/2 N + PM were 53%, 50%, and 32% higher than those for 0 N, 1/2 N, and N treatments, respectively (<em>p</em><span> &lt; 0.05). The soil organic carbon sequestration rates (SOCSR) for 1/2 N + PM were 224%, 208%, and 192% higher than those for 0 N, 1/2 N, and N treatments, respectively (</span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The average annual N<sub>2</sub><span><span>O emissions from 1/2 N + PM were 51% lower than those from the N treatment. Compared to 0 N, 1/2 N and N treatments, the average NGHGE for 1/2 N + PM decreased by 41%, 41%, and 52%, and the average greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI, the yield-scaled NGHGE) from 1/2 N + PM reduced by 67%, 52%, and 53%, respectively. The decreases in NGHGE and GHGI were predominantly due to increased SOCSR (contributions of 187–308% and 81–325%, respectively) in 1/2 N + PM. The average soil nitrate, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, soil organic carbon contents, and pH value for 1/2 N + PM treatment were higher than those for the 1/2 N and N treatments (p &lt; 0.05). Compared to 0 N and 1/2 N treatments, 1/2 N + PM treatment significantly increased the average rice yield. However, no significant difference in average yield was observed between the 1/2 N + PM and N treatments. Gross margin analysis showed that the economic profit for 1/2 N + PM was higher than that for the other three treatments. Thus, the combined application of reduced chemical fertilizers and pig manure is an effective and economic way to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions and increase </span>soil fertility in double-rice cropping systems.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 107799"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions through a combination of pig manure and reduced inorganic fertilizer application in a double-rice cropping system: Three-year results\",\"authors\":\"Cong Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Ma ,&nbsp;Jianlin Shen ,&nbsp;Dan Chen ,&nbsp;Liang Zheng ,&nbsp;Tida Ge ,&nbsp;Yong Li ,&nbsp;Jinshui Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2021.107799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Manure amendment in croplands is common practice for soil carbon sequestration, and may also reduce </span>greenhouse gas emissions<span>. Few studies focus on the effects of manure application on the net greenhouse gas emissions (NGHGE, the global warming impacts of soil carbon sequestration and CH</span></span><sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub><span>O emissions) in double-rice cropping fields. Herein, a field experiment was conducted to analyze the effects of pig manure<span><span><span> application in combination with reduced chemical fertilizers on the NGHGE, </span>soil properties, and yields in a double-rice </span>paddy field<span> in 2012–2015. Four treatments were included: 0 N (no nitrogen fertilizer); 1/2 N (chemical nitrogen fertilizer reduced by 50%); N (100% chemical nitrogen fertilizer); and 1/2 N + PM (pig manure complemented with chemical fertilizer application). The average annual CH</span></span></span><sub>4</sub> emissions for 1/2 N + PM were 53%, 50%, and 32% higher than those for 0 N, 1/2 N, and N treatments, respectively (<em>p</em><span> &lt; 0.05). The soil organic carbon sequestration rates (SOCSR) for 1/2 N + PM were 224%, 208%, and 192% higher than those for 0 N, 1/2 N, and N treatments, respectively (</span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The average annual N<sub>2</sub><span><span>O emissions from 1/2 N + PM were 51% lower than those from the N treatment. Compared to 0 N, 1/2 N and N treatments, the average NGHGE for 1/2 N + PM decreased by 41%, 41%, and 52%, and the average greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI, the yield-scaled NGHGE) from 1/2 N + PM reduced by 67%, 52%, and 53%, respectively. The decreases in NGHGE and GHGI were predominantly due to increased SOCSR (contributions of 187–308% and 81–325%, respectively) in 1/2 N + PM. The average soil nitrate, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, soil organic carbon contents, and pH value for 1/2 N + PM treatment were higher than those for the 1/2 N and N treatments (p &lt; 0.05). Compared to 0 N and 1/2 N treatments, 1/2 N + PM treatment significantly increased the average rice yield. However, no significant difference in average yield was observed between the 1/2 N + PM and N treatments. Gross margin analysis showed that the economic profit for 1/2 N + PM was higher than that for the other three treatments. Thus, the combined application of reduced chemical fertilizers and pig manure is an effective and economic way to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions and increase </span>soil fertility in double-rice cropping systems.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107799\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092100503X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092100503X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

农田肥料改良是土壤固碳的常用做法,也可能减少温室气体排放。很少有研究关注施肥对双季稻田温室气体净排放(NGHGE,即土壤固碳和CH4、N2O排放对全球变暖的影响)的影响。本研究通过2012-2015年双水田试验,分析了猪粪与减量化肥配施对稻田氮氧化物排放量、土壤性质和产量的影响。4个处理:0 N(不施氮肥);1/2 N(化学氮肥减少50%);N(100%化学氮肥);1/2 N + PM(猪粪配施化肥)。1/2 N + PM处理的年平均CH4排放量分别比0 N、1/2 N和N处理高53%、50%和32% (p <0.05)。1/2 N + PM处理的土壤有机碳固存率(SOCSR)分别比0 N、1/2 N和N处理高224%、208%和192% (p <0.05)。1/2 N + PM处理的年平均N2O排放量比N处理低51%。与0 N、1/2 N和N处理相比,1/2 N + PM处理的平均NGHGE分别降低了41%、41%和52%,平均温室气体强度(GHGI,产量比例NGHGE)分别降低了67%、52%和53%。NGHGE和GHGI的减少主要是由于1/2 N + PM中社会总温度的增加(贡献分别为187 ~ 308%和81 ~ 325%)。1/2 N + PM处理的土壤硝态氮、微生物生物量碳氮、土壤有机碳含量和pH值均高于1/2 N和N处理(p <0.05)。与0氮和1/2氮处理相比,1/2氮+ PM处理显著提高了水稻平均产量。1/ 2n + PM处理与N处理的平均产量无显著差异。毛利率分析表明,1/2 N + PM处理的经济利润高于其他3个处理。因此,减量化肥与猪粪配施是双季稻系统中和温室气体排放和提高土壤肥力的有效而经济的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions through a combination of pig manure and reduced inorganic fertilizer application in a double-rice cropping system: Three-year results

Manure amendment in croplands is common practice for soil carbon sequestration, and may also reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Few studies focus on the effects of manure application on the net greenhouse gas emissions (NGHGE, the global warming impacts of soil carbon sequestration and CH4 and N2O emissions) in double-rice cropping fields. Herein, a field experiment was conducted to analyze the effects of pig manure application in combination with reduced chemical fertilizers on the NGHGE, soil properties, and yields in a double-rice paddy field in 2012–2015. Four treatments were included: 0 N (no nitrogen fertilizer); 1/2 N (chemical nitrogen fertilizer reduced by 50%); N (100% chemical nitrogen fertilizer); and 1/2 N + PM (pig manure complemented with chemical fertilizer application). The average annual CH4 emissions for 1/2 N + PM were 53%, 50%, and 32% higher than those for 0 N, 1/2 N, and N treatments, respectively (p < 0.05). The soil organic carbon sequestration rates (SOCSR) for 1/2 N + PM were 224%, 208%, and 192% higher than those for 0 N, 1/2 N, and N treatments, respectively (p < 0.05). The average annual N2O emissions from 1/2 N + PM were 51% lower than those from the N treatment. Compared to 0 N, 1/2 N and N treatments, the average NGHGE for 1/2 N + PM decreased by 41%, 41%, and 52%, and the average greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI, the yield-scaled NGHGE) from 1/2 N + PM reduced by 67%, 52%, and 53%, respectively. The decreases in NGHGE and GHGI were predominantly due to increased SOCSR (contributions of 187–308% and 81–325%, respectively) in 1/2 N + PM. The average soil nitrate, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, soil organic carbon contents, and pH value for 1/2 N + PM treatment were higher than those for the 1/2 N and N treatments (p < 0.05). Compared to 0 N and 1/2 N treatments, 1/2 N + PM treatment significantly increased the average rice yield. However, no significant difference in average yield was observed between the 1/2 N + PM and N treatments. Gross margin analysis showed that the economic profit for 1/2 N + PM was higher than that for the other three treatments. Thus, the combined application of reduced chemical fertilizers and pig manure is an effective and economic way to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions and increase soil fertility in double-rice cropping systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural land use modulates responses of soil biota and multifunctionality to increased antibiotic pressures Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system Trade-offs and synergies of food-water-land benefits for crop rotation optimization in Northeast China Water and sediment regulation eluting and washland planting lead to nitrogen increase in the lower reaches of the Yellow River
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1