宗教政治化。象征主义的力量。前南斯拉夫及其继承国的情况

IF 1 Q1 Arts and Humanities Sudosteuropa Pub Date : 2017-01-28 DOI:10.1515/soeu-2017-0013
K. Boeckh
{"title":"宗教政治化。象征主义的力量。前南斯拉夫及其继承国的情况","authors":"K. Boeckh","doi":"10.1515/soeu-2017-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1990s aff ected the sense of belonging of migrants from the former Yugoslavia in Britain. It also has the merit of giving pride of place to the complexity of individual identities, challenging prefabricated labels imposed by institutional actors to classify migrants. This is timely and relevant given the current migration crisis. However, the book does have certain regrettable shortcomings. Methodologically, it does not explain whether and how interviews and surveys differ, nor what questions were asked and how they were analysed. Moreover, the fact that extracts from survey participants and interviews are not contextualised and that ethnic identity received so much of the author’s att ention makes the illustrated nuances less powerful in challenging and problematising essentialist visions of transnational ties and diasporas.","PeriodicalId":51954,"journal":{"name":"Sudosteuropa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/soeu-2017-0013","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politicization of Religion. The Power of Symbolism. The Case of Former Yugoslavia and its Successor States\",\"authors\":\"K. Boeckh\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/soeu-2017-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1990s aff ected the sense of belonging of migrants from the former Yugoslavia in Britain. It also has the merit of giving pride of place to the complexity of individual identities, challenging prefabricated labels imposed by institutional actors to classify migrants. This is timely and relevant given the current migration crisis. However, the book does have certain regrettable shortcomings. Methodologically, it does not explain whether and how interviews and surveys differ, nor what questions were asked and how they were analysed. Moreover, the fact that extracts from survey participants and interviews are not contextualised and that ethnic identity received so much of the author’s att ention makes the illustrated nuances less powerful in challenging and problematising essentialist visions of transnational ties and diasporas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudosteuropa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/soeu-2017-0013\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudosteuropa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2017-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudosteuropa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2017-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

20世纪90年代的动荡影响了前南斯拉夫移民在英国的归属感。它还有一个优点,那就是把个人身份的复杂性放在最重要的位置,挑战机构行为者为对移民进行分类而强加的预制标签。鉴于当前的移民危机,这是及时和相关的。然而,这本书确实有一些令人遗憾的缺点。在方法上,它没有解释访谈和调查是否不同以及如何不同,也没有解释问了什么问题以及如何分析这些问题。此外,调查参与者和访谈的摘录并没有被语境化,而种族认同受到了作者如此多的关注,这使得所阐述的细微差别在挑战和质疑跨国关系和散居者的本质主义观点时不那么有力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Politicization of Religion. The Power of Symbolism. The Case of Former Yugoslavia and its Successor States
1990s aff ected the sense of belonging of migrants from the former Yugoslavia in Britain. It also has the merit of giving pride of place to the complexity of individual identities, challenging prefabricated labels imposed by institutional actors to classify migrants. This is timely and relevant given the current migration crisis. However, the book does have certain regrettable shortcomings. Methodologically, it does not explain whether and how interviews and surveys differ, nor what questions were asked and how they were analysed. Moreover, the fact that extracts from survey participants and interviews are not contextualised and that ethnic identity received so much of the author’s att ention makes the illustrated nuances less powerful in challenging and problematising essentialist visions of transnational ties and diasporas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sudosteuropa
Sudosteuropa AREA STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Frontmatter Frontmatter Frontmatter Retracing Labor in Yugoslav Socialism . Reflections on Research and Archival Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1