非缴费养老金对劳动力供给和私人收入转移的影响:来自新加坡的证据

IF 0.9 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR IZA Journal of Labor Policy Pub Date : 2017-11-20 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3072878
Yan-ying Chen, Yi Jin Tan
{"title":"非缴费养老金对劳动力供给和私人收入转移的影响:来自新加坡的证据","authors":"Yan-ying Chen, Yi Jin Tan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3072878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-contributory pensions are becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. As their effects are likely to be context-dependent, evaluating their effects in a wide range of settings is important for establishing the external validity of the non-contributory pension literature. We use a new monthly panel dataset and a difference-in-differences strategy to study the effect of a new non-contributory pension in Singapore (the Silver Support Scheme or SSS) on labour supply, work expectations, private cash transfers, and expenditure, 1 year after its implementation. We find no evidence that receiving SSS payouts led to a fall in labour supply, work expectations, or the receipt of private cash transfers in the first year after SSS implementation—our estimated effects for these outcomes are statistically insignificant and are either negative but close to zero or positive. Our point estimates of the effects of receiving SSS payouts on expenditure are positive but too imprecise to allow us to make any definitive conclusions. Lastly, we do not find evidence of anticipatory effects among younger individuals who are not age-eligible for payouts yet. These results, when coupled with our finding in a companion paper that the SSS improved recipients’ subjective well-being, suggest that the SSS was successful in improving recipients’ welfare without substantial crowding out of private transfers or changes in labour market behaviour of current and future SSS beneficiaries.","PeriodicalId":45367,"journal":{"name":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of non-contributory pensions on labour supply and private income transfers: evidence from Singapore\",\"authors\":\"Yan-ying Chen, Yi Jin Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3072878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-contributory pensions are becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. As their effects are likely to be context-dependent, evaluating their effects in a wide range of settings is important for establishing the external validity of the non-contributory pension literature. We use a new monthly panel dataset and a difference-in-differences strategy to study the effect of a new non-contributory pension in Singapore (the Silver Support Scheme or SSS) on labour supply, work expectations, private cash transfers, and expenditure, 1 year after its implementation. We find no evidence that receiving SSS payouts led to a fall in labour supply, work expectations, or the receipt of private cash transfers in the first year after SSS implementation—our estimated effects for these outcomes are statistically insignificant and are either negative but close to zero or positive. Our point estimates of the effects of receiving SSS payouts on expenditure are positive but too imprecise to allow us to make any definitive conclusions. Lastly, we do not find evidence of anticipatory effects among younger individuals who are not age-eligible for payouts yet. These results, when coupled with our finding in a companion paper that the SSS improved recipients’ subjective well-being, suggest that the SSS was successful in improving recipients’ welfare without substantial crowding out of private transfers or changes in labour market behaviour of current and future SSS beneficiaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IZA Journal of Labor Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IZA Journal of Labor Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

非缴费养老金在世界范围内越来越普遍。由于其影响可能取决于背景,在广泛的环境中评估其影响对于建立非缴费养老金文献的外部有效性很重要。我们使用一个新的月度面板数据集和差异化策略来研究新加坡新的非缴费养老金(白银支持计划或SSS)在实施一年后对劳动力供应、工作期望、私人现金转移和支出的影响。我们没有发现任何证据表明,在SSS实施后的第一年,接受SSS支付会导致劳动力供应、工作期望或私人现金转移的减少——我们对这些结果的估计影响在统计上是微不足道的,要么是负面的,要么接近零,要么是正面的。我们对接受SSS支出对支出影响的点估计是积极的,但过于不精确,无法得出任何明确的结论。最后,我们没有发现证据表明在年龄尚不符合支付条件的年轻人中存在预期效应。这些结果,再加上我们在一篇配套论文中的发现,即SSS改善了受助人的主观幸福感,表明SSS成功地改善了受助人的福利,而没有大量挤出私人转移或改变当前和未来SSS受益人的劳动力市场行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of non-contributory pensions on labour supply and private income transfers: evidence from Singapore
Non-contributory pensions are becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. As their effects are likely to be context-dependent, evaluating their effects in a wide range of settings is important for establishing the external validity of the non-contributory pension literature. We use a new monthly panel dataset and a difference-in-differences strategy to study the effect of a new non-contributory pension in Singapore (the Silver Support Scheme or SSS) on labour supply, work expectations, private cash transfers, and expenditure, 1 year after its implementation. We find no evidence that receiving SSS payouts led to a fall in labour supply, work expectations, or the receipt of private cash transfers in the first year after SSS implementation—our estimated effects for these outcomes are statistically insignificant and are either negative but close to zero or positive. Our point estimates of the effects of receiving SSS payouts on expenditure are positive but too imprecise to allow us to make any definitive conclusions. Lastly, we do not find evidence of anticipatory effects among younger individuals who are not age-eligible for payouts yet. These results, when coupled with our finding in a companion paper that the SSS improved recipients’ subjective well-being, suggest that the SSS was successful in improving recipients’ welfare without substantial crowding out of private transfers or changes in labour market behaviour of current and future SSS beneficiaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IZA Journal of Labor Policy
IZA Journal of Labor Policy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes scientific articles that are relevant for policy-making. This refers to papers addressing the impact of institutional settings and policy interventions on labor market outcomes, both from a theoretical as well as from an empirical point of view. In addition, the IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes literature reviews and meta-analyses that synthesize existing research on policy relevant issues.
期刊最新文献
The distributional effects of the pension system reform in Poland Minimum wage and collective bargaining shocks: a narrative database for advanced economies Job Protection — It is Good to be an Insider The effects of more intensive counseling for disadvantaged unemployed youth Explaining the Evolution of Job Tenure in Europe, 1995–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1