与钉鞋打滑相关的生物力学变量

IF 2.7 Q2 ERGONOMICS Footwear Science Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1080/19424280.2023.2199281
J. Wannop, D. Stefanyshyn
{"title":"与钉鞋打滑相关的生物力学变量","authors":"J. Wannop, D. Stefanyshyn","doi":"10.1080/19424280.2023.2199281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirty-four male participants performed a rapid change of direction cutting task at maximal effort wearing the same footwear conditions (Nike Vapour Edge Speed 360) on an infilled artificial turf surface (FieldTurf Inc.). The task consisted of the participant sprinting towards the force platform, performing a 180 turn and then sprinting away from the force platform as quickly as possible. The artificial turf surface was constructed with a low carpet fibre faceweight (reduced number of fibres) compared to a conventional surface, allowing for increased infill movement, and providing a surface that reduced traction and fostered footwear slippage. A motion capture system (240Hz) and force platform (2400Hz) were used to quantify the movement/orientation of the shoe and the forces generated during the change of direction movement. All trials were classified into one of three categories based on the horizontal displacement of the forefoot during the stance phase of the change in direction: (i) stick, which represented the lowest movement (25% of trials), (ii) standard, which represented the average movement (50% of trials), and (iii) slip, which represented the highest movement (25% of trials). Biomechanical data was then statistically compared to the Standard condition using a paired t-test (alpha 1⁄4 0.05).","PeriodicalId":45905,"journal":{"name":"Footwear Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical variables associated with cleated footwear slipping\",\"authors\":\"J. Wannop, D. Stefanyshyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19424280.2023.2199281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thirty-four male participants performed a rapid change of direction cutting task at maximal effort wearing the same footwear conditions (Nike Vapour Edge Speed 360) on an infilled artificial turf surface (FieldTurf Inc.). The task consisted of the participant sprinting towards the force platform, performing a 180 turn and then sprinting away from the force platform as quickly as possible. The artificial turf surface was constructed with a low carpet fibre faceweight (reduced number of fibres) compared to a conventional surface, allowing for increased infill movement, and providing a surface that reduced traction and fostered footwear slippage. A motion capture system (240Hz) and force platform (2400Hz) were used to quantify the movement/orientation of the shoe and the forces generated during the change of direction movement. All trials were classified into one of three categories based on the horizontal displacement of the forefoot during the stance phase of the change in direction: (i) stick, which represented the lowest movement (25% of trials), (ii) standard, which represented the average movement (50% of trials), and (iii) slip, which represented the highest movement (25% of trials). Biomechanical data was then statistically compared to the Standard condition using a paired t-test (alpha 1⁄4 0.05).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Footwear Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Footwear Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2023.2199281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Footwear Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2023.2199281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

34名男性参与者穿着相同的鞋子(Nike vapor Edge Speed 360),在填充的人造草坪表面(FieldTurf Inc.)上以最大的努力执行快速改变方向切割任务。这项任务包括参与者冲向作用力平台,进行180度大转弯,然后尽可能快地冲出作用力平台。与传统表面相比,人造草坪表面具有较低的地毯纤维面重(减少了纤维数量),允许增加填充运动,并提供减少牵引力和促进鞋类打滑的表面。运动捕捉系统(240Hz)和力平台(2400Hz)用于量化鞋的运动/方向以及方向运动变化过程中产生的力。根据前脚在方向改变的站位阶段的水平位移,将所有试验分为三类之一:(i)坚持,代表最低的运动(25%的试验);(ii)标准,代表平均的运动(50%的试验);(iii)滑,代表最高的运动(25%的试验)。采用配对t检验(alpha 1 / 4 0.05)将生物力学数据与标准条件进行统计学比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biomechanical variables associated with cleated footwear slipping
Thirty-four male participants performed a rapid change of direction cutting task at maximal effort wearing the same footwear conditions (Nike Vapour Edge Speed 360) on an infilled artificial turf surface (FieldTurf Inc.). The task consisted of the participant sprinting towards the force platform, performing a 180 turn and then sprinting away from the force platform as quickly as possible. The artificial turf surface was constructed with a low carpet fibre faceweight (reduced number of fibres) compared to a conventional surface, allowing for increased infill movement, and providing a surface that reduced traction and fostered footwear slippage. A motion capture system (240Hz) and force platform (2400Hz) were used to quantify the movement/orientation of the shoe and the forces generated during the change of direction movement. All trials were classified into one of three categories based on the horizontal displacement of the forefoot during the stance phase of the change in direction: (i) stick, which represented the lowest movement (25% of trials), (ii) standard, which represented the average movement (50% of trials), and (iii) slip, which represented the highest movement (25% of trials). Biomechanical data was then statistically compared to the Standard condition using a paired t-test (alpha 1⁄4 0.05).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Footwear Science
Footwear Science ERGONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The influence of longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and biomechanics in male and female runners How do runners select their shoes? An in-store experience Effect of increased shoe longitudinal bending stiffness on ankle and foot biomechanics in jump-cut movements of low and high degrees Advancing our ability to quantify an individual’s habitual motion path and deviation when running Injury and performance-related running biomechanics in advanced footwear technology compared to minimalist footwear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1