下一个转移注意力的是关于一般智力衰退的传言

IF 3.5 2区生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ACS Chemical Biology Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1017/iop.2023.37

Jeffrey M. Cucina, Theodore L. Hayes

{"title":"下一个转移注意力的是关于一般智力衰退的传言","authors":"Jeffrey M. Cucina, Theodore L. Hayes","doi":"10.1017/iop.2023.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we focus on the lowered validity for general mental ability (GMA) tests by presenting: (a) a history of the range restriction correction controversy; (b) a review of validity evidence using various criteria; and (c) multiple paradoxes that arise with a lower GMA validity","PeriodicalId":11,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rumors of general mental ability’s demise are the next red herring\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Cucina, Theodore L. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2023.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we focus on the lowered validity for general mental ability (GMA) tests by presenting: (a) a history of the range restriction correction controversy; (b) a review of validity evidence using various criteria; and (c) multiple paradoxes that arise with a lower GMA validity\",\"PeriodicalId\":11,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Chemical Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Chemical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.37\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.37","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇论文中，我们通过以下内容来关注GMA测试的有效性降低：（a）范围限制校正争议的历史；（b）使用各种标准对有效性证据进行审查；以及（c）GMA有效性较低时出现的多重悖论

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Rumors of general mental ability’s demise are the next red herring

In this paper we focus on the lowered validity for general mental ability (GMA) tests by presenting: (a) a history of the range restriction correction controversy; (b) a review of validity evidence using various criteria; and (c) multiple paradoxes that arise with a lower GMA validity

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACS Chemical Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

5.00%

发文量

353

审稿时长

3.3 months

期刊介绍： ACS Chemical Biology provides an international forum for the rapid communication of research that broadly embraces the interface between chemistry and biology. The journal also serves as a forum to facilitate the communication between biologists and chemists that will translate into new research opportunities and discoveries. Results will be published in which molecular reasoning has been used to probe questions through in vitro investigations, cell biological methods, or organismic studies. We welcome mechanistic studies on proteins, nucleic acids, sugars, lipids, and nonbiological polymers. The journal serves a large scientific community, exploring cellular function from both chemical and biological perspectives. It is understood that submitted work is based upon original results and has not been published previously.